Connect with us

Accounting

PCAOB local forums coming to 5 cities

Published

on

The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board plans to host a series of five in-person forums this year, with different members of the board visiting cities including Chicago, Los Angeles, Denver, Miami and Jersey City.

The forums will focus on auditing in the small business environment and on auditing broker-dealers. The initial forum will feature PCAOB chair Erica Williams in Chicago on May 22. Another board member, George Botic, will be hosting a forum in Los Angeles this summer, followed by forums this fall hosted by board members Kara Stein (Denver), Christina Ho (Miami) and Anthony Thompson (Jersey City). The exact dates and locations for those four forums will be announced as those events get closer.

The PCAOB plans to livestream the forums in Chicago and Jersey City over the internet and recordings of all five forums will be made available on the PCAOB’s website for those won’t be able to attend in person. 

“Smaller firms play an important role in our work to protect investors,” said Williams in a statement Wednesday. “These forums allow the PCAOB to share valuable resources and information with small firms to help them improve audit quality, while giving us a chance to hear from them directly about their unique needs and challenges.”

Some firms are likely to be giving the PCAOB board members an earful about some of its recent proposals. Last week, the PCAOB proposed two far-reaching standards on firm and engagement metrics and firm reporting, which together would impose new requirements for reporting on information such as audit resources, fees, governance structure, engagement metrics, workload, experience of audit personnel, financial information, any lawsuits and regulatory actions they’re facing, leadership, network membership and more. The PCAOB is already facing pushback from audit firms over its so-called NOCLAR proposal, which would toughen the requirements for auditors to be on the lookout for signs of fraud and noncompliance with laws and regulations at their clients, effectively putting them in the role of whistleblowers. The Center for Audit Quality organized a letter-writing campaign last year to spur comments opposing the proposal and a number of state CPA societies, CPA firms and business groups like the U.S. Chamber of Commerce registered their opposition to the proposals. The PCAOB pushed back the deadline for receiving comments and heard concerns and feedback for and against the NOCLAR proposal during a roundtable discussion webcast last month. 

PCAOB logo - office - NEW 2022

The Pennsylvania Institute of CPAs is among the groups expressing their opposition to the NOCLAR proposal. “This is one of the most important proposals that I’ve seen come out from standard-setters in my career,” said Allison Henry Allison Henry, PICPA’s vice president of professional and technical standards. “I think it highlights a significant issue that we have in terms of the expectation gap and the differences of perspective from what investors think that we provide in terms of assurance and what we actually are capable of providing.”

PICPA and other accounting organizations are concerned about the scope and the pervasiveness of what is actually being asked for by the PCAOB with the NOCLAR proposal. “When we work, for example, with attorneys, and in many cases, the legal profession, people expect that they are going to use conditional language, and they’re not going to give definitive answers in terms of what’s going to happen in the future,” said Henry. “But then they turn to the auditors, and it’s almost like they want absolute certainty, and absolute assurance, relative to what the opinion is driving at without any limitations whatsoever. And I get the sense from what is being proposed that they want that absolute assurance. They’re looking at what the investors want, and what is being proposed is impossible in terms of the scope.”

She explained her views in a recent article.

The PCAOB is likely to be hearing from auditors at those forums about such proposals. The forums are tailored to PCAOB-registered firms that audit smaller public companies or broker-dealers, giving firms the chance to interact directly with representatives from the PCAOB as well as other regulators in an educational setting. The PCAOB has held similar forms since 2004, and Thompson hosted them virtually in 2022 and 2023. This year marks the first time the forums will be held in person since 2019, as many such events went virtual due to the pandemic.

Participants at this year’s forums will receive a refresher on various auditing requirements as well as learn about new requirements that will become applicable in the near future. In addition to remarks from PCAOB board members, the agenda includes the following:

  • Presentations by PCAOB staff from the Office of the Chief Auditor, the Division of Registration and Inspections, and the Division of Enforcement and Investigations;
  • Illustrative examples related to revenue, critical audit matters, and fraud/journal entries, among other topics; and
  • Presentations by staff of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority and the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Registration is required for the May 22 forum in Chicago. There’s no fee to attend it either in-person or virtually, but advance registration needs to be done here. CPE credits will be available only for in-person attendees.

Forum attendees can submit questions in advance via email and attendees will also be able to submit questions during the forum. Registration info, event location and other details for the rest of the in-person forums this year will be announced closer to the date of each event.

Continue Reading

Accounting

In the blogs: Higher questions

Published

on

Valuations this year; handling interviewees; AI and accounting ed.; and other highlights from our favorite tax bloggers.

Higher questions

Haunting of the Hill House

  • Eide Bailly (https://www.eidebailly.com/taxblog): The House Ways and Means Committee planned to begin to publicly debate and amend tax legislation on May 13, with the ultimate goal to produce the “one big, beautiful” bill to extend the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act: “This is the stage where seemingly dead and buried ideas mysteriously come back to life to haunt the proceedings.” 
  • Wiss (https://wiss.com/insights/read/): Key highlights of the proposed beauty.
  • Current Federal Tax Developments (https://www.currentfederaltaxdevelopments.com/): And a bulleted summary.
  • Tax Vox (https://www.taxpolicycenter.org/taxvox): If Congress expands the Child Tax Credit with TCJA extension, who might benefit and what might it cost?
  • Tax Foundation (www.taxfoundation.org/blog): Policymakers will also decide the fate of the SALT cap. Debate rages about making the cap more generous, along with possible limits on pass-through workarounds and SALT deductions  by corporations. While capping business SALT could raise additional revenue, it would risk slowing economic growth.

Soft skills

Rational decisions

Tidying up

  • Boyum & Barenscheer (https://www.myboyum.com/blog/): Should you vacuum the meeting room? How many times should you talk with a candidate? Keys — some often overlooked — to effective interviewing.
  • The National Association of Tax Professionals (https://blog.natptax.com/): A WISP is the written information security plan that verifies how your firm protects taxpayer information. You can’t ignore them anymore, and here’s how to build a compliant one.
  • Taxing Subjects (https://www.drakesoftware.com/blog): An outstanding guide to SEO for accounting firms. 
  • AICPA & CIMA Insights (https://www.aicpa-cima.com/blog): Where does AI fit into accounting education? Everywhere.

Continue Reading

Accounting

House committee marks up tax reconciliation bill

Published

on

The House Ways and Means Committee held a hearing Tuesday to mark up the so-called “one, big beautiful bill” extending the expiring provisions of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act while adding other tax breaks for tip income, overtime pay and Social Security income and eliminating tax credits from the Inflation Reduction Act for renewable energy as well as the Direct File and Free File programs.

“Today, this Committee will move forward on President Trump’s promise of delivering historic tax relief to working families, farmers and small businesses,” said committee chair Jason Smith, R-Missouri, in his opening statement. “The One Big Beautiful Bill is the key to making America great again. This moment has been years in the making. While Democrats were defending IRS audits on the middle class and tax carveouts for the wealthy, Republicans on this Committee got on the road, to hear from real Americans about how the 2017 tax cuts benefited them. This bill wasn’t drafted by special interests or K Street lobbyists. It was drafted by the American people in communities across the country.”

Democrats blasted the bill. “In 2017, Republicans passed a tax law that was supposed to pay for itself, raise wages, and help working families,” said ranking member Richard Neal, D-Massachusetts. “None of that happened. Instead, it exploded the deficit, worsened inequality, and left everyday Americans behind. Now they want to double down on the same failed playbook. One that rigs the system for billionaires and big corporations while everyone else pays the price.”

Among the provisions, the bill would make the expiring rate and bracket changes of the TCJA permanent and increase the inflation adjustment for all brackets excluding the 37% threshold, according to a summary from the Tax Foundation. The bill would also make the expiring standard deduction levels permanent and temporarily increase the standard deduction by $2,000 for joint filers, $1,500 for head of household filers and $1,000 for all other filers from 2025 through the end of 2028. It would also make the personal exemption elimination permanent, and make the $750,000 limitation and the exclusion of interest on home equity loans for the home mortgage interest deduction permanent. It would also make the state and local tax deduction cap, also known as the SALT cap, permanent at a higher threshold of $30,000, phasing down to $10,000 at a rate of 20% starting at modified adjusted gross income of $200,000 for single filers and $400,000 for joint filers.

Other changes and limitations to itemized deductions would be made permanent, including the limitation on personal casualty losses and wagering losses and termination of miscellaneous itemized deductions, Pease limitation on itemized deductions, and certain moving expenses.

The bill is likely to go through some changes when it goes to the Senate. “Politically, we’ve been talking about the process for the last couple months,” said Mark Baran, managing director at CBIZ’s national tax office. “Congress is finally able to pass a concurrent resolution to unlock the budget reconciliation process.”

“The House and the Senate have completely different instructions on what they’re going to cut and how they’re going to score,” he added. “Some of that’s very controversial, and that needs to be worked out. But now we’re getting into the actual crafting of provisions and legislation.”

According to a summary on the CBIZ site, the bill would make permanent and increase the Section 199A pass-through entity deduction from 20% to 23%, also known as the qualified business income, or QBI, deduction. The bill includes provisions that open the door for pass-through entity owners in specified service industries to use the deduction. It would also extend current deductions for research and experimental expenses through Dec. 31, 2029, and extend 100% bonus depreciation through that same date.

The bill would also allow businesses to include amortization and depreciation when figuring the business interest limitation through Dec. 31, 2029, while making permanent the excess business loss limitation.

In addition, the bill would retroactively terminate the Employee Retention Tax Credit for taxpayers who filed refund claims after Jan. 31, 2024. 

In keeping with Trump campaign promises, the bill would eliminate taxes on tips for employees in certain defined industries where tipping has been a traditional form of compensation. There would be a new $4,000 deduction for seniors that phases out starting at $75,000 of income. The bill would also eliminate taxes on overtime pay.

The bill would give individuals an above-the-line deduction for interest on loans used to purchase American-made cars, but that would be capped at $10,000 with income phaseouts starting at $100,000 (single) and $200,000 (married filing jointly).

The bill would also increase taxes on certain private college investment income up to a maximum of 21% on universities with a student-adjusted endowment above $2 million.

It would also roll back some of the renewable energy provisions from the Inflation Reduction, including a phaseout and restrictions on clean energy facilities starting in 2029, while also limiting or eliminating clean housing energy and vehicle credits. The bill would sunset major IRA clean electricity tax credits, including the clean electricity production tax credit (45Y), clean electricity investment tax credit (48E), and nuclear electricity production tax credit (45U) begin phasing out after 2028 and finish phasing out by the end of 2031; repeal hydrogen production credit (45V) for facilities beginning construction after 2025, according to the Tax Foundation. It would also phase out advanced manufacturing production credit (45X) for wind energy components after 2027, for all other eligible components after 2031. Across several IRA clean energy credits, the bill would repeal transferability after the end of 2027 and further limit credits based on involvement of foreign entities of concern. On the other hand, it would expand the clean fuel production credit (45K), and tighten rules on the 126(m) limitation for executive compensation.

The bill would terminate the current Direct File program at the Internal Revenue Service and establish a public-private partnership between the IRS and private sector tax preparation services to offer free tax filing, replacing both the existing Direct File and Free File programs.  

Continue Reading

Accounting

FASAB mulls accounting impact of federal reorganization

Published

on

The Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board is asking for input on emerging accounting issues and questions related to reporting entity reorganizations and abolishments as the federal government endures wide-ranging layoffs and reductions in force, including the elimination of entire agencies by the Elon Musk-led Department of Government Efficiency.

“Federal agencies and their functions, from time to time, have been reorganized and abolished,” said FASAB in its request for information and comment

Reorganization refers to a transfer, consolidation, coordination, authorization or abolition of one (or more) agency or agencies or a part of their functions. Abolition is a type of reorganization and refers to the whole or part of an agency that does not have, upon the effective date of the reorganization, any functions.

The Trump administration has recently moved to all but eliminate parts of the federal government such as the U.S. Agency for International Development and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, and earlier this month, Republicans on the House Financial Services Committee passed a bill that would transfer the responsibilities of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board to the Securities and Exchange Commission. 

FASAB issues federal financial accounting standards and provides timely guidance. Practitioner responses to the request for information will support its efforts to identify, research and respond to emerging accounting and reporting issues related to reorganization and abolishment activities, such as transfers of assets and liabilities among federal reporting entities. The input will be used to help inform any potential staff recommendations and alternatives for FASAB to consider regarding short- and long-term actions and updates to federal accounting standards and guidance in this area.

The questions include:

  1. Have any recent or ongoing reorganization activities or events affected the scope of functions, assets, liabilities, net position, revenues, and expenses assigned to your reporting entity (or, for auditors, your auditees)? If so, please describe.
  2. What accounting issues have you (or your auditees) encountered (or do you anticipate) in connection with recent or potential reorganization activities and events?
  3. Please describe the sources of standards and guidance that you (or your auditees) are applying to recent, ongoing, or pending reorganization activities and events.
  4. Have you experienced any difficulties or identified gaps in the accounting and disclosure standards for reorganization activities and events? What potential improvements would you recommend, if any?

FASAB is asking for responses by July 15, 2025, but acknowledged that late or follow-up submissions may be necessary given the provisional nature of the request. Responses should be emailed to [email protected] with “RERA RFI response” on the subject line.

Continue Reading

Trending