Connect with us

Accounting

PCAOB sanctions five firms for violating reporting requirements

Published

on

The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board announced Tuesday it settled disciplinary orders sanctioning five audit firms for failing to comply with PCAOB reporting requirements, the latest in increased enforcement efforts.

The firms are Bush & Associates CPA, Barton CPA, Crowe Hussain Chaudhury & Co., B S R & Co. (“KPMG India”) and RSM Brasil Auditores Independentes Sociedade Simples. 

“Failures to make required disclosures undercut the PCAOB’s ability to protect investors, and firms must not take these obligations lightly,” PCAOB chair Erica Williams said in a statement.

PCAOB logo - office - NEW 2022

Three of the firms violated PCAOB Rule 3211, Auditor Reporting of Certain Audit Participants, which requires a firm to file a Form AP within a specified time after an audit report issued by the firms is included in a document filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Barton failed to file multiple required Form APs within the specified time, and Bush and Crowe failed entirely to file the Form APs until they were notified of their delinquency by PCAOB staff.

KPMG India and RSM Brazil violated PCAOB Rule 2203, Special Report, which requires a firm to file a Form 3 disclosing certain reportable events — such as criminal, regulatory, administrative or disciplinary proceedings against a firm or its personnel — within 30 days of their occurrence. KPMG India and RSM Brazil both failed to timely report multiple disciplinary proceedings against the firms, and, in the case of KPMG India, its personnel, by local regulators.

KPMG India and RSM Brazil’s violations were identified through regular monitoring of registered firms’ compliance with Form 3 reporting requirements. Bush, Barton and Crowe’s violations were identified through a sweep.

“Sweeps are a critical aspect of the PCAOB enforcement program,” Robert Rice, director of the PCAOB’s Division of Enforcement and Investigations, said in a statement. “We will continue to use sweeps — and ongoing monitoring — to identify firms that fail to comply with PCAOB reporting requirements.”

Tuesday’s sanctions are the latest in a long line of increased enforcement efforts by the PCAOB, most recently including banning the firm Yusufali & Associates and barring its partner for multiple violations. In September, it settled sanctions against four firms for failing to make required communications with audit committees, as well as one firm for violating reporting requirements. The board previously sanctioned Baker Tilly, Grant Thornton Bharat, Mazars and SW Audit in February, as well as three firms in November 2023 and five firms in July 2023.

Without admitting or denying the findings, all the firms consented to their respective orders, which censure the firms and impose $50,000 civil money penalties on Bush and $25,000 each on Barton, Crowe, KPMG India and RSM Brazil. The orders also require each firm to undertake remedial measures to improve their policies and procedures concerning PCAOB reporting compliance.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Adopt, Test, Monitor: simplifying AI for CPAs

Published

on

When it comes to AI, where do we start? What’s relevant? How do we determine what’s worth our time and investment? Consider the AI Adopt, Test, Monitor (ATM) Framework.

Continue Reading

Accounting

IRS warns deadlines coming for taxpayers hit by disasters

Published

on

Taxpayers in disaster areas who received extensions to file their 2023 returns must, depending on location, file their returns by Feb. 3 or May 1, 2025.

Taxpayers in the entire states of Louisiana and Vermont, all of Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands and parts of Arizona, Connecticut, Illinois, Kentucky, MinnesotaMissouriMontanaNew YorkPennsylvaniaSouth DakotaTexas and Washington state have until Feb. 3 to file.

Those in all of AlabamaFloridaGeorgiaNorth Carolina and South Carolina and parts of AlaskaNew Mexico, Tennessee, Virginia and West Virginia  have until May 1 to file. For these taxpayers, May 1 will also be the deadline for filing their 2024 returns and paying any tax due.

Hurricane Milton damage in Florida
Destroyed homes after Hurricane Milton in St. Pete Beach, Florida, on Oct. 10.

Tristan Wheelock/Bloomberg

Taxpayers who live or have a business in Israel, Gaza or the West Bank and certain other taxpayers affected by the terrorist attacks in the State of Israel also have until Sept. 30 this year to file and pay. This includes all 2023 and 2024 returns.

Eligible taxpayers are individuals and businesses affected by various disasters that occurred during the late spring through the end of 2024. For extension filers, payments on the 2023 tax year returns are not eligible for the additional time because they were originally due last spring before any of these disasters occurred.

The IRS normally provides relief, including postponing various tax filing and payment deadlines, for any area designated by the Federal Emergency Management Agency. The current list of eligible localities is on the disaster relief page on IRS.gov.

The agency will work with any taxpayer who lives outside the disaster area but who has records necessary to meet a deadline occurring during the postponement period in the affected area. Taxpayers qualifying for relief who live outside the disaster area should contact the IRS at (866) 562-5227. This also includes workers who assisted with relief who are affiliated with a recognized government or philanthropic organization.

Continue Reading

Accounting

10 states with the most and least competitive property taxes in 2025

Published

on

Complimentary Access Pill

Enjoy complimentary access to top ideas and insights — selected by our editors.

The Tax Foundation recently ranked the states with most and least competitive property tax regimes in 2025. 

Delaware has the most competitive property taxes, and has held the top spot almost every year since 2020, with the exception of 2023. Connecticut, with its high property tax rates, is the least competitive.

Competitiveness isn’t simply a matter of how high or low an individual state’s property tax rate is; it also reflects the overall complexity of their tax regime, which can be influenced by other factors, like any estate, inheritance, gift, and other discretionary wealth taxes the state may levy. States were scored on a scale of 1 to 10, where 10 was the most competitive, and 1 the least.

Read more about the states with the most and least competitive property taxes in 2025 below.

In 2020-2024, the rank of Washington, D.C., does not affect the rank of states featured.

States with the most competitive property taxes

2025
rank
State

2025

score

2024

rank

2023

rank

2022

rank

2021

rank

2020

rank

10 South Dakota

5.93

14

14

21

30

11

9 Pennsylvania

5.97

8

8

7

7

8

8 Wisconsin

6.00

13

13

15

16

19

7 Nevada

6.04

7

7

6

6

7

6 Ohio

6.26

5

3

4

3

4

5 Indiana

6.32

4

4

3

4

3

4 North Dakota

6.34

6

6

8

9

5

3 Idaho

6.36

3

5

5

5

6

2 New Mexico

6.45

2

1

2

2

2

1 Delaware

6.58

1

2

1

1

1

States with the least competitive property taxes

2025
rank
State

2025

score

2024

rank

2023

rank

2022

rank

2021

rank

2020

rank

50 Connecticut

2.76

50

50

50

50

50

49 Vermont

2.92

49

49

49

49

49

48 District of Columbia

3.20

50

50

49

43

46

47 Maine

3.16

47

48

46

43

45

46 New York

3.30

48

47

48

48

47

45 Massachusetts

3.93

46

45

45

44

42

44 Nebraska

3.93

45

46

43

45

43

43 Wyoming

4.09

35

37

37

41

46

42 Illinois

4.14

44

39

42

42

41

41 New Jersey

4.16

43

41

40

40

40

Continue Reading

Trending