Connect with us

Accounting

PCAOB sees audit deficiencies leveling off at largest firms, but problems remain

Published

on

The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board released inspection reports for all 2023 annually inspected firms Thursday, including the six U.S. Global Network Firms.

The timing came months before the reports have been released in recent years thanks to ongoing efforts to accelerate the release of reports.

The PCAOB inspection reports came accompanied by a new staff Spotlight publication, offering an overview of staff observations from the 2023 inspections. Staff observations include the fact that while overall deficiency rates continued to increase in the aggregate, with 46% of the engagements reviewed having at least one Part I.A deficiency, “we have begun to see the aggregate deficiency rate at the Big Four firms level off, as well as improvements in the deficiency rates at several of the other annually-inspected firms.” The Spotlight report also explores how outliers influence the overall average, among other observations.

For example, the report on BDO USA seems to stand out with an 86% Part I.A audit deficiency rate. Twenty-five of the 29 audits reviewed by the PCAOB in 2023 were included in Part I.A of the report due to the significance of the deficiencies identified. The identified deficiencies primarily related to the firm’s testing of controls over and/or substantive testing of revenue and related accounts, inventory, and business combinations.  

PCAOB logo - office - NEW 2022

Grant Thornton had a 54% Part I.A deficiency rate. Fifteen of the 28 audits reviewed by the PCAOB in 2023 were included in Part I.A of this report due to the significance of the deficiencies identified. The identified deficiencies primarily related to the firm’s testing of controls over and/or substantive testing of revenue and related accounts and inventory.   

Among the Big Four, for Deloitte & Touche LLP, 12 of the 56 audits reviewed by the PCAOB in 2023 were included in Part I.A of the report due to the significance of the deficiencies identified. The identified deficiencies primarily related to the firm’s testing of controls over and/or substantive testing of revenue, inventory, investment securities, insurance-related liabilities, and allowance for credit losses/allowance for loan losses. That translated into a 21% Part I.A audit deficiency rate.

At PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, the Part I.A deficiency rate was the lowest among the Big Four at 18%. Ten of the 57 audits reviewed by the PCAOB in 2023 were included in Part I.A of the report due to the significance of the deficiencies identified. The identified deficiencies primarily related to the firm’s testing of controls over and/or substantive testing of revenue and related accounts and goodwill and intangible assets.  

“When we look at the U.S. Big Four firms (this excludes their non-U.S. affiliates), which as of December 31, 2023 collectively audit approximately 80% of the market capitalization, aggregate Part I.A deficiencies held steady at 26% in 2023 after previously jumping from 12% in 2020 to 16% in 2021 and 26% in 2022,” said the report. “Similarly, the percentage of audits reviewed with multiple Part I.A deficiencies was nearly stagnant, at 21% in 2022 and 20% in 2023, after previously jumping from 9% in 2020 to 13% in 2021 to 21% in 2022. Aggregate Part II criticisms at the U.S. Big Four firms also fell for the first time in three years.”

At Ernst & Young LLP, 22 of the 59 audits reviewed by the PCAOB in 2023 were included in Part I.A of the report due to the significance of the deficiencies identified. The identified deficiencies mainly related to the firm’s testing of controls over and/or substantive testing of revenue and related accounts, business combinations, and inventory. That translated into a 37% Part I.A deficiency rate.

At KPMG LLP, 15 of the 58 audits reviewed in 2023 were included in Part I.A of this report due to the significance of the deficiencies identified. The identified deficiencies primarily related to the firm’s testing of controls over and/or substantive testing of investment securities and revenue and related accounts.  That translated into a 26% Part I.A audit deficiency rate.

The PCAOB also published new charts on its website illustrating much of the data in the U.S. GNF and U.S. annual Non-Affiliate Firms (NAF) inspection reports for the first time as part of its ongoing efforts to increase transparency in inspection data and make it easier for stakeholders to understand and compare inspection results both across firms and over time. The charts build on the May 2023 transparency improvements for inspection reports and the July 2023 release of new features allowing PCAOB website visitors to easily filter and compare thousands of audit firm inspection reports.

Some of the highest rates at these firms included B F Borgers CPA PC, which had a 100% Part I.A audit deficiency rate and has been suspended from public audits. Marcum LLP, which was recently acquired by publicly traded CBIZ, had an 81% Part I.A audit deficiency rate, in part due to its heavy reliance on the SPAC market for audits. Baker Tilly US had a 67% Part I.A audit deficiency rate. At Moss Adams LLP, there was a 42% Part I.A audit deficiency rate. WithumSmith+Brown, PC had a 40% Part I.A audit deficiency rate. On the low side, Cohen & Co., Ltd. had an 11% Part I.A audit deficiency rate, and Crowe US LLP had only a 7% Part I.A audit deficiency rate.

“These inspection results point to some small signs of movement in the right direction,” said PCAOB Chair Erica Williams in a statement. “Still, overall deficiency rates are unacceptable, and firms must do better. Now is the time to double down on efforts to improve and deliver the audit quality investors deserve.”

“Making inspection information accessible and actionable for PCAOB stakeholders is a top priority and a means to improve audit quality,” said Christine Gunia, director of the PCAOB’s Division of Registration and Inspections, in a statement. “We will continue to search for new ways to bring our insights to investors, audit committees, and others.”

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending