Connect with us

Accounting

PE alternative Franklin Alliance acquires first accounting firm

Published

on

Franklin Alliance is offering small and midsized firms the opportunity to scale without turning to private equity dollars.

Franklin Alliance partners with accounting firms with less than $10 million in revenue, providing resources to address issues like succession planning, recruiting and technology adoption. It announced Tuesday the acquisition of Bement & Company., a family-owned CPA firm based in the Salt Lake City area, and said it has several other firms under contract.

Firms of all sizes are wrestling with the ongoing talent shortage, rapidly developing technology and a generation of retirement-ready partners in need of succession planning. As private equity comes into play as a solution to these issues, smaller firms are often overlooked.

“Small to midsized business owners, investors and individuals are often underserved, caught between tax preparation shops that provide little strategic value and large corporate CPA firms that lack personal attention,” Brent Bement, owner of Bement & Company and cofounder of Franklin Alliance, said in a statement. “While exploring potential CPA platform partnerships, I found many did not share my vision: to add real value to clients and employees while having sustainable growth without sacrificing the personal touch. That vision is what drew me to Franklin Alliance and why I’m proud to be a co-founder, strategic advisory board member and investor alongside exceptional partners.” 

But Franklin Alliance is not private equity. Its cofounder Steve Shein explained that, as an operating company, the typical pressures of a private equity relationship are removed. There is more flexibility, longer timelines and more opportunities for liquidity by way of being funded by venture capital. 

“Venture capital and private equity are similar, but they have a lot of differences,” Shein told Accounting Today. “I think one of those is more focused on growth. The other one is more focused on cost optimization. But we are focused on growth.”

Even as a VC-backed company, Franklin Alliance doesn’t necessarily need more funding unlike many other startups. Shein explained: “We are in a different situation because these businesses that we partner with are all profitable. We don’t burn cash. We raise capital from investors to partner and acquire pieces of all these firms. So we’re creating an engine that is cash flow positive, and we can reinvest that capital in more firms.”

Franklin Alliance
Brent Bement, Tuyee Yeboah, Ben Holloway and Steve Shein, cofounders of Franklin Alliance

Franklin Alliance

Franklin Alliance maintains a “small business ethos,” helping scale and offering operational support while preserving the local firm’s identity and culture. 

“The Franklin Alliance model is uniquely positioned to add value to firms in this segment,” Allan Koltin, CEO of Koltin Consulting Group, said in a statement. “Franklin’s structure as a VC-backed operating company allows it to avoid the constructs and potential constraints of traditional private equity funds. I view Franklin’s model as especially beneficial for accounting firms in the smaller segment of the market, where firm cultures are normally less institutionalized.”

How it works

The Franklin Alliance acquires a controlling stake in the firm. (Shein believes it’s important for partners to maintain equity to keep skin in the game.) The company then deploys its resources, such as an advisory board of accounting experts, to help the firm achieve its unique operational goals, whether it be recruiting new talent, adding capital or adopting technology.

“I find this unique platform approach, specifically targeting smaller firms often overlooked by larger firms and private equity in their roll-up strategies, to be particularly intriguing,” Rick Dreher, former head of Wipfli and a strategic advisor to Franklin Alliance, said in a statement.

Franklin Alliance has a broad geographic focus encompassing the Midwest, Mountain Region and South, but Shein said they it’s not limited to these regions. He also said Franklin Alliance does not aim to consolidate firms: “We are intentional about not viewing these firms as add-ons that should be combined into one, larger firm.”

“As someone who was building a thesis on the technology side, I did start to really build conviction that these technologies will make accountants’ lives easier,” Shein said. “And what’s the ultimate way to invest behind that trend? Well, you can invest in the technology providers themselves, which is what a venture capitalist would do, or you can build a platform to buy into these small firms that will ultimately be the beneficiaries of this technology and the way it evolves.”

Continue Reading

Accounting

Global ESG Reporting Standards and Double Materiality Compliance

Published

on

Corporate accounting departments face expanding reporting expectations as international sustainability disclosure standards achieve regulatory enforcement across major global jurisdictions. Chief Accounting Officers (CAOs) and corporate controllers are establishing rigorous internal accounting controls to treat Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) metrics with the same data precision, auditability, and governance as traditional financial statements.

Regulatory Harmonization Under Global Sustainability Frameworks
The implementation of standardized sustainability reporting frameworks—notably rules established by international sustainability accounting boards—has created unified expectations for public and large private enterprises. Corporations must report standardized metrics covering greenhouse gas emissions (Scope 1, 2, and material Scope 3), energy utilization, workforce demographics, and supply chain governance.

In Europe and other participating international jurisdictions, double materiality principles are mandatory. Under double materiality, organizations must report both how external sustainability risks impact corporate financial performance, and how internal corporate operations affect surrounding environmental and social structures.

Integrating Sustainability Metrics into Core ERP Systems
To provide auditable non-financial data, enterprise organizations are integrating specialized carbon accounting and ESG management platforms directly into core ERP systems. Automated data collectors capture energy utility invoices, logistics fuel consumption metrics, and vendor compliance records in real time.

Establishing automated, traceable data pipelines ensures that non-financial reporting is supported by clear audit trails. This structured approach allows external financial auditors to provide reasonable assurance on sustainability disclosures during annual corporate reporting cycles.

Financial Impacts and Capital Market Disclosure
Accurate ESG reporting directly influences corporate cost of capital and institutional credit ratings. Commercial lenders and institutional asset managers systematically incorporate sustainability metrics into risk pricing models. Companies that demonstrate transparent, verifiable progress in operational energy efficiency and climate risk mitigation benefit from expanded access to green bond markets and lower debt pricing.

Action Steps for Accounting Leadership
1. Implement Double Materiality Frameworks: Conduct comprehensive assessments to identify material financial and operational sustainability metrics.
2. Build Auditable Non-Financial Data Pipelines: Automate ESG data collection within core accounting software to ensure data integrity.
3. Align Sustainability with Annual Financial Filings: Prepare non-financial disclosures concurrently with financial statements to satisfy regulatory audit expectations.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Modernizing Internal Controls: Machine Learning and Continuous Monitoring in Auditing

Published

on

Internal audit departments and corporate risk managers are modernizing internal control frameworks by shifting from periodic sampling techniques to continuous monitoring and machine learning analytics. As operational data volumes increase across enterprise organizations, automated control testing ensures financial integrity, prevents corporate fraud, and streamlines annual audit engagements.

The Limitation of Periodic Audit Sampling
Historically, internal and external auditors evaluated internal controls by reviewing random samples of financial transactions—often analyzing less than five percent of total ledger entries. In complex enterprise environments, periodic sampling methods carry inherent risks of overlooking localized financial misstatements, unauthorized disbursements, or operational control breakdowns.

In 2026, progressive internal audit functions are utilizing automated continuous monitoring platforms that evaluate one hundred percent of financial transactions in real time. Continuous control auditing systems continuously monitor general ledger entries, procurement approvals, and expense reimbursements across all operating subsidiaries.

AI-Powered Fraud Detection and Anomaly Identification
Machine learning models trained on historical corporate financial data excel at identifying subtle transactional anomalies that indicate potential fraud or operational error. Automated systems instantly flag duplicate invoice payments, unapproved vendor creation, unusual journal entry timing, and unauthorized override of authority thresholds.

When an anomaly is detected, the automated auditing platform generates an instant risk alert, allowing internal audit teams to investigate root causes immediately. Early detection prevents minor operational errors from escalating into material weaknesses in financial reporting.

Streamlining External Audit Preparation
Continuous internal control monitoring delivers significant benefits during annual external financial audits. External audit firms can review continuous audit logs and automated control testing documentation, reducing the time required for manual field testing.

This integrated approach lowers overall audit compliance fees, reduces administrative burdens on corporate accounting staff, and provides senior management and audit committees with real-time visibility into the organization’s overall risk profile.

Core Implementation Guidelines
1. Transition to 100% Data Testing: Replace legacy sampling methods with automated continuous audit monitoring systems.
2. Deploy Anomaly Detection Algorithms: Implement machine learning models to identify unauthorized transactions and operational control overrides.
3. Align Internal and External Audit Workflows: Coordinate continuous control testing protocols with external auditors to optimize annual compliance cycles.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Tax Compliance and Global Regulatory Harmonization in 2026

Published

on

Corporate tax accounting departments are navigating an era of unprecedented regulatory complexity as global tax harmonization frameworks take full effect alongside real-time digital tax reporting mandates. Tax directors and accounting teams are adopting cloud-based tax compliance automation tools to manage multi-jurisdictional tax liabilities and satisfy stringent reporting rules across international jurisdictions.

Implementation of Global Minimum Tax Provisions
The implementation of international tax reform agreements—notably the Pillar Two global minimum tax framework—has reshaped multinational corporate tax planning. Multinational enterprises with consolidated revenues exceeding established thresholds must ensure an effective tax rate of at least 15% across every jurisdiction in which they operate.

Accounting teams are implementing specialized tax calculation modules integrated directly into enterprise resource planning (ERP) platforms. These automated tools calculate effective tax rates per country, identify top-up tax liabilities, and generate standardized compliance documentation required by national tax authorities.

Real-Time Digital Invoicing and E-Reporting Mandates
Tax authorities across Europe, Latin America, and Asia-Pacific have enacted mandatory electronic invoicing (e-invoicing) and continuous transaction controls (CTC). Under these systems, corporate transaction data must be submitted electronically to government portals in real time at the point of sale or invoice issuance.

This shift toward continuous digital tax reporting eliminates traditional annual tax audits in favor of ongoing automated compliance monitoring. Accounting departments are upgrading invoicing software to ensure seamless XML data formatting, digital signature authentication, and real-time validation against tax authority databases.

Automation and Data Analytics in Corporate Tax Strategy
To keep pace with dynamic tax legislation, tax departments are transitioning from reactive compliance teams to proactive strategic advisors. Machine learning algorithms analyze corporate transactional data to identify tax credits, research and development (R&D) incentives, and cross-border transfer pricing adjustments.

By automating routine tax return filings and calculations, corporate tax directors can focus on long-term capital structuring, evaluating the tax implications of corporate mergers, and optimizing international supply chain networks.

Strategic Priorities for Tax Executives
1. ERP System Upgrades: Ensure enterprise software is capable of generating real-time, granular tax data required for global minimum tax compliance.
2. E-Invoicing Integration: Implement scalable e-invoicing platforms to satisfy regional continuous transaction control regulations.
3. Strategic Tax Analytics: Utilize predictive tax modeling tools to evaluate structural changes in corporate operations and cross-border trade.

Continue Reading

Trending