Connect with us

Accounting

Private equity in accounting: The end of the beginning

Published

on

The first wave of private equity investments in the accounting space are coming to the end of their terms, and it’s time to see what direction they will take.

Private equity has enabled rapid rates of profitability and growth in the profession, and for firms with aging partners looking for liquidity, it offers multiples that are double, triple or even quadruple what they could take home on their own, and the ability to take cash off the table much earlier than expected.

The trend kicked off in August 2021 when Top 25 Firm EisnerAmper took a PE investment from TowerBrook Capital Partners. Later that year in October, Citrin Cooperman, another Top 25 Firm, took an investment from New Mountain Capital. 

Then, in January of this year, Citrin Cooperman announced it would receive an investment from Blackstone, which would acquire a majority stake in the firm from New Mountain. The deal was the first instance of an accounting firm transferring private equity ownership from one group to another in the U.S. Experts expect EisnerAmper to follow suit with an exit in late 2025 or early 2026.

“They’ll go down in the history books as grand-slam home runs. What they thought would take five to seven years got accomplished in three to four,” said Allan Koltin, CEO of Koltin Consulting Group, who has advised many of these large PE deals. “What they underestimated — everyone did, me included — was how fast this industry would take off.”

“I’ve watched, now, over 16 of these transactions go on. Every one of them is hitting or exceeding their numbers,” he continued. “I’m not seeing the kind of stereotypical heavyhandedness or micromanaging that we always talk about when we talk about private equity.”

(Read more:Staying independent in the age of private equity.“)

While the wave of PE is unprecedented in the accounting profession, investments in the broader professional and financial services are not. Just look at insurance firms, brokerage advisory firms, consulting firms, appraisal firms, valuation firms, forensic firms, outsourcing firms and recruiting firms.

“Many of those firms are already on their second, third, fourth, fifth flip, so there’s a whole industry already with professional financial services,” Koltin said. “They’re all people businesses, so people seem surprised sometimes at how fast this has moved and question whether they’ll actually be flipped. I don’t think we have to look too far to see that this has actually been going on for multiple decades already, and it’s working.”

Crossroads sign with blank arrows

Jongkyu – stock.adobe.com

David Wurtzbacher, CEO of Ascend, echoed the sentiment: “There are deep capital markets for great companies and great industries.”

Ascend is a platform firm launched in January 2023 by Alpine Investors. It ranked No. 29 on Accounting Today‘s 2025 Top 100 Firms list, with $314 million in revenue and over 1,400 employees.

“I have found that the profession questions who would want to own a big accounting firm, and that is a pretty uninformed view,” Wurtzbacher said. “Having come from finance and investing, what I can tell you is that investors exist in all shapes and sizes, and some of them are very, very large investors that can own very, very large companies. From a starting point, there’s going to be a market because this is a great profession. It’s an essential service. It’s very steady revenue; investors call that high revenue quality. It’s quite profitable; a significant portion of the profit is actual cash flow, which is not true in every business. And it’s an industry that’s growing. So for all those reasons, there will always be demand in general for businesses in this space, no matter their scale.”

Meet the players

There are two main camps of firms with private equity money: the “motherships” and the “roll-ups.” Motherships are when large firms, like Top 10 Firm Grant Thornton or Top 25 Firm Aprio (or EisnerAmper and Citrin Cooperman, for that matter), sell a majority stake to PE, and then use the capital that comes with the deal to acquire smaller firms. Roll-ups are when platforms, often PE-owned, acquire smaller regional players, who may often retain more autonomy than in a traditional acquisition — think Ascend and Springline Advisory. 

Experts say private-equity backed firms have four main exit routes: Sell to a strategic investor (like Marcum selling to CBIZ), sell to a larger PE firm (like Citrin selling to Blackstone), trade into a continuation fund, or go public through an initial public offering. 

CBIZ is currently the only publicly traded accounting firm. But in 2023, Ernst & Young proposed and then abandoned a plan to split its audit and consulting divisions, and take the consulting business public. In April of this year, Reuters reported that Andersen Group confidentially filed for an IPO in the U.S.

(Read more: Picking the right PE partner.”)

“The Big Four, ultimately, in the next two to three years — I think they’re too big for private equity, [so] I think they’ll all go the way of IPOs.” Koltin said.

He also sees third-party buyers entering the space, like large family offices, sovereign wealth funds, pension funds and international buyers from Canada and Europe. 

“One thing I do not think we will see is the exits of the PE firms in the roll-ups,” Koltin said. “I do not see them going to what we’ll call the ‘mothership’ CPA firm. I see them, rather, just going to the next PE firm that comes into the deal. The reason is, there’s a level of autonomy that those firms wanted, and if they wanted to go into one of these big mothership firms, they would have done it the first time.”

Myths, fears and truths

There are two sides to every story. While there is much conversation about the upsides of PE, there is also discussion of its downsides. The business model of private equity relies on return on investment, so some experts worry that the hyperfocus on scale and profitability may mean compromising firm culture, talent and values. Others worry that private equity does not have accounting firms’ interests in mind, and, in the extreme, will load their books with debt and leave them high and dry.

“I think the myth or the fallacy is that the PE firms are running these accounting firms,” Koltin said. “When I talk to the firms that have gone the way of PE, what they say to me is they’re an independent firm with a financial sponsor. For many of these firms, they’re still running their firms. The PE partner — which could be a minority partner, it could be a majority partner — what they’ve done is select firms that have really good leadership, and as the story goes, they’ve said, ‘Listen, we have day jobs, too. The last thing we want to do is micromanage your business, so we’re going to find the best in class, and you go run it. If you have a major capital or strategic issue, get us involved.'” 

Firms have warmed up to the presence of PE in the accounting space. 

In the beginning, “I don’t even think people were really that open to having discussions,” said Tim Brackney, CEO of Springline Advisory, a Top 100 Firm with $89 million in revenue and 365 employees. Springline is a platform firm formed in January 2024 by Trinity Hunt Partners. 

(Listen:The new deal: The evolving landscape of M&A and PE)

“It was more of a struggle to even try to have a discussion because the perception of private equity — some of it earned, some of it out of the zeitgeist — was, ‘Hey, you’ve got barbarians at the gate. They’re going to come in, and they’re going to destroy your culture.’ So a lot of that first phase was helping people understand that PE is not a monolith,” Brackney said. “We spent a fair amount of time educating people about the different models within PE so that they would be at least open to having a discussion if the word ‘PE’ was in the sentence.”

To be sure, there are potentially negative side effects to firms’ long-term relationships with PE, particularly to firm culture.

“There are some firms who are going to take PE money and who will lose some of their identity and have some degradation to their culture,” Brackney said. “The soul of any company is the culture, which is the fabric of the operating norms of the people there. That has to be a lens through which you’re making decisions. If you’re not, you will lose that.”

Private equity is also changing the market landscape as we know it. As large PE-backed firms eat up smaller and midsized firms, the middle hollows out.

“I think that there are national firms right now who ostensibly are focused on the middle market, or taking in PE money, and that PE money is going to drive them upstream to hunt bigger game,” Brackney explained. The issue there is that when PE-backed firms begin to scale, they try to take on the big firms and miss out on the client opportunity they’re leaving behind. 

Additionally, as more private equity firms chomp at the bit to get their piece of the accounting pie, firm valuations soar and PE firms overpay, Brackney said. Then, at the turn, they are stretched too thin. “Their time frame and their methods for extracting value are going to be under pressure,” he said.

At the end of the day, the pros and cons come down to the unique partnership of the two parties involved. 

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending