Connect with us

Accounting

Resolution to reconciliation: What’s ahead in tax legislation

Published

on

Congress has been extremely busy, with both bodies passing budget resolutions. However, they have passed very different budget resolutions, according to Marc Gerson, former chief tax counsel to the House Ways and Means Committee and a member at law firm Miller & Chevalier. 

“They have to agree to a concurrent budget resolution to unlock the budget reconciliation process,” he said. “This month has been taken up by dealing with funding the government to avoid a shutdown, with a recess scheduled for this week. They  have to await the results of the Florida special election, which will give Republicans more breathing room in the House. The House has outlined what a tax package would be, of $4.5 trillion using a standard current law baseline including extensions of the [Tax Cuts and Jobs Act] and expiring provisions.”

That, he noted, may not be sufficient to cover the permanency of the TCJA and other expiring provisions, and the promises made by President Trump during the campaign, such as no tax on tips, Social Security, and overtime pay. 

Attendees hold signs as Donald Trump speaks during a campaign event

“If they ultimately agree to the House approach, they have to either add revenue raisers, or additional spending cuts or abandon permanency and agree to shorter-term extensions,” he explained. “That would create room to add other things, or to use the current policy baseline. Then they would not have to pay for the extension of current law, and it would provide more flexibility, but it’s unclear whether it would pass muster with the Senate parliamentarian.”

A key priority for lawmakers is the extension of the “Big Three” business extenders, according to Gerson: R&D expensing, EBITDA-based interest expense deductions, and 100% bonus depreciation. They are also debating the retroactive effective date, with Trump proposing Jan. 20, 2025, which may complicate efforts to secure earlier relief. 

“R&D, Section 163(j) EBITDA, and 100% bonus depreciation will definitely be included, but there is uncertainty as to whether they will be applied retroactively,” he said. 

“These three provisions were enacted as part of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 but were sunset due to revenue limits,” he explained. 

Fully deductible R&D expenditures expired at the end of 2021, along with the ability to use EBITDA for the 163(j) interest expense deduction limitation, and 100% bonus depreciation. Since then, taxpayers have had to capitalize and amortize these expenditures over five years. Also, since 2022 taxpayers have been required to use the less favorable earnings before interest and taxes for the Code Section 163(j) limitation on the deduction for business interest expense. And 100% bonus depreciation began decreasing at the end of 2022, and is currently at a 40% rate for 2025. 

Each of the “Big Three” would have been extended by the Tax Relief for American Families and Workers Act of 2024, which provided for retroactive extension through 2025. The bill passed the House on a bipartisan vote in January 2024, but was bogged down in the Senate.  

The fact that President Trump indicated his support for 100% bonus depreciation by referring to his inauguration date of Jan. 20, 2025, in his recent joint address to Congress is an indication that the provisions will be drafted to apply retroactively, but is at odds with the general practice of tax bills applying to tax years “beginning after December 31,” or “beginning before January 1.”

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending