Connect with us

Accounting

Resorts World to ask NY to reconsider casino tax rates after bid

Published

on

Resorts World, one of three bidders for a casino license in the greater New York City area, will ask the state to reconsider the company’s tax proposal after offering to pay far more than two other possible projects, a person with knowledge of the matter said.

The company, part of Malaysia’s Genting Group, wants the state to lower its proposed tax rate or raise the levy that may be imposed on the other bidders, said the person, who asked not to be identified discussing nonpublic information.

Resorts World has proposed the highest tax at 56% on slot machines for its project in Queens. Hard Rock International, which is planning a resort nearby in partnership with Mets owner Steve Cohen, is offering 25%, the state minimum, while Bally’s Corp. has proposed a 30% levy for its Bronx project.

The New York City casino process “is a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity for the entire state to benefit from new revenue for mass transit and public education,” Resorts World said in a statement. “The tax rates we have presented, at 56% on slots and 30% on tables, reflect our sense of responsibility to our properties across New York State, the greater industry, and the public.”

A spokesperson for Bally’s declined to comment. Hard Rock didn’t respond to a request for one.

In weighing the bids, the state is looking for both economic growth and a fresh source of tax revenue. Governor Kathy Hochul is considering higher corporate taxes as part of an effort to close a potential budget gap and help fund some of Zohran Mamdani’s agenda as New York City mayor.

The companies want to make sure they retain enough of the gambling proceeds to make their investments pay off.

The license awards are part of a 12-year effort to expand gambling in New York. Members of the state’s Gaming Facility Location Board are touring the three proposed sites on Monday, ahead of a final decision that’s expected to come Dec. 1. The board could choose none, all three or any combination therein.

Bidders were required to propose their own license fees and tax rates, subject to certain minimums, a mechanism designed to maximize state revenue. That approach is unusual, according to James Kilsby, a casino analyst with Vixio Regulatory Intelligence. 

Resorts World’s property “would be one, if not the, most highly taxed commercial casino in the country,” Kilsby said. Casino taxes rates vary from 6.75% in Nevada to as much as 55% in Pennsylvania. 

Resorts World, which operates a slot machine-only facility next to the Aqueduct racetrack in Queens presently and is proposing a new $5.5 billion resort on the site, said it’s already the state’s largest taxpayer. 

Customers play at gambling machines at the Resorts World Casino, operated by Genting Group, in Queens, New York.

New York’s casino award process was also unusual in giving local committees the right to approve projects before they went to the state board. That step eliminated four of the eight initial bidders. After MGM Resorts International dropped out due to proposed changes in the duration of the licensing term, there were only three bidders left for three licenses. That reduced the need for the remaining contenders to suggest higher tax rates, Kilsby said.

Taxes are a significant cost to casinos. Lower levies allow operators to offer more perks to gamblers to entice them to come to their properties. 

In response to questions from bidders, the location board said state regulators will set the final tax rates, with the possibility that different operators pay different rates.

State Senator Joseph Addabbo, chairman of the racing, gaming and wagering committee, hopes there’s some harmonization in the tax rates. 

“We need sustainable businesses,” he said in an interview. “I don’t want a business to come back [and] say they need a reduction. I think the decision board has its work to do.”

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending