Connect with us

Accounting

RIP, AI skepticism — hello, AI paralysis

Published

on

In Plato’s “Allegory of the Cave,” prisoners mistake shadows for reality — until one escapes and realizes the truth lies beyond the cave wall. At first, this awareness is destabilizing. But it is also liberating.

Since ChatGPT burst into the mainstream a few years ago, many responded to AI advancements in accounting like that cave: partners and firm leaders squinted at generative AI and dismissed it as hype. The skepticism was strong. “Is this thing going to stick around? Should I even care? Do I really need to do anything?” was a common refrain.

But the good news? The tide is changing, and the predominant sentiment is shifting as a profession, from one of skepticism to acknowledgement. Today, I see increasingly more leaders acknowledging that AI will significantly shape the future of the profession.

This is a moment to celebrate because the hardest place to create change is when people don’t believe change is needed. If they’re content with shadows, there’s no conversation to be had.

 And yet, that awakening has brought a new problem: paralysis.

“I want to do something, but I don’t know where to start.”

“There are so many vendors that have AI, I don’t want to choose wrong.”

“I can’t justify the cost until I know the ROI.”

This kind of stalling is everywhere. Here’s the silver lining: paralysis is an easier problem to solve than denial. If someone wants to move but feels stuck, that’s a solvable problem. So I am encouraged at our ability to collectively move forward on harnessing the full power of AI. 

Here are three forms of paralysis I see regularly, and how we can address them. 

1. “We don’t know where to start.”

 
My team hears this flavor of paralysis consistently in our work with CPA firms. Firms know AI is important. They feel the urgency. But the path forward seems fuzzy. 

A journey of a thousand miles begins with the first one. The key is to take a first step that is small, concrete, pragmatic and safe. For example, a very common starting place for my team is onboarding Microsoft 365 Copilot for CPA firms.

But here’s the catch — throwing an AI tool into the firm without context or support is a recipe for failure. That’s why it’s important to build the scaffolding for success. That means hands-on, experiential training and a foundational learning curriculum, even for tasks as seemingly simple as redrafting an email. It’s about enabling your team to learn in low-risk, high-impact ways and gain familiarity, confidence and a visceral understanding of how AI works (and where it falls completely flat…anyone that has argued with M365 Copilot on how that client meeting does exist knows what I’m talking about.)

 This then serves as a basis for taking the second step, third step and so on.

2. “There are too many vendors — what if we pick the wrong one and get stuck?”

This paralysis is driven by fear of making the wrong choice. This is a very valid concern — just look at how the vendor landscape has exploded. And accountants are brilliant at what they do, but you are not engineers and product managers, nor are you expected to be. 

This is an area where some very strategic help has an outsized impact, and the great news is that there are more resources and support than ever to help you. Of course, there are your associations and alliances. I see this topic being very actively discussed within these trusted networks that you already belong to.

In addition, there are a growing number of excellent consultants entering the profession. Especially with the rise of private equity and reallocation of resources, there are an increasing number of leaders who are now serving our profession by sharing their battle-tested knowledge on setting up scalable technical systems and vetting vendors. I am part of a network of such fractional executives, including CIOs, called CPA Consultants Collective, where we are building collective knowledge on the fast-changing accounting technology vendor landscape to help our clients.

3. “The ROI is unclear and we don’t want to waste money.”

Ah, the classic accountant’s dilemma. If we can’t tie it to a P&L line, we hesitate to spend.

When it comes to ROI, I encourage firms to embrace a robust framework that segments hard ROI and soft ROI, and quantitative and qualitative ROI.

Hard ROI refers to when you take an action and immediately see direct cost savings or revenue increases. A common example in the profession is outsourcing. From a margin perspective, once you outsource, there’s a direct, immediate impact to your bottom line.

Soft ROI, in contrast, is where other actions need to happen to unlock the full value of the investment. AI is a great example. When it saves time, the time saved doesn’t automatically convert to better business outcomes unless you do something with that time. That might mean readjusting headcount or building a cross-selling motion to monetize newly unlocked capacity.

Quantitative ROI is what most firms are used to tracking — it includes clear metrics like hours saved, increased billings or reduced costs.

Qualitative ROI includes less tangible, but equally critical, benefits such as improved employee satisfaction, faster onboarding, better client experience or enhanced decision-making.

The firms that recognize these nuances are the ones best positioned to turn efficiency into impact and scale.

The path forward

Paralysis is frustrating, but it’s also a signal. It means firms want to move. That’s a gift. So what now? Stop waiting for perfect clarity. Start with what you can adopt today, even if it’s small. Use experimentation as a strategy. Redefine ROI to capture benefits that may fall outside of narrower definitions.

It’s time to get moving.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending