Connect with us

Accounting

RMD relief for IRAs offers tax planning opportunities

Published

on

Financial advisors, tax professionals and their clients who inherited individual retirement accounts in this year or the previous three received 12 more months of flexibility from the IRS.

In an April 16 notice, the agency and the Treasury Department tacked on at least one more year without required minimum distributions for IRA and annuity beneficiaries who must transfer the full amount into their income for federal tax purposes within a decade under the terms of the 2019 Secure Act, rather than using the previously available lifetime “stretch” strategy. The “welcome news” for heirs provides more time “for additional growth and compounding without the burden of taxes,” Allen Laufer, the director of financial planning for New York-based registered investment advisory firm Silvercrest Asset Management Group, noted in an email.

READ MORE: With Congress slow to act, financial advisors plan ahead on estate taxes

For planners and clients seeking to reduce potential estate taxes and RMD headaches down the line, that extra year of relief also creates an opportunity to consider trust strategies that could address both issues at once, according to Laufer and Theresa de Leon, the national director of sales for Arden Trust, a Kestra Holdings company. 

The notice represents “the final regulations” that “will apply for purposes of determining RMDs for calendar years beginning on or after Jan. 1, 2025,” the IRS said in the notice itself. In the meantime, heirs and their tax professionals can think through the potential timing and bracket impact of inheriting the assets amid the potential sunsetting of the lower individual rates of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act in 2026, Laufer said. 

“If they’re currently in a low tax bracket but anticipate moving to a higher one later, it might make sense to capture taxable income in the lower bracket year,” he said. “Let’s not forget that the IRA must distribute all its assets within the 10-year period. By deferring distributions, subsequent year distributions may be larger and push individuals into a higher tax bracket.”

Since “retirement accounts are always an important part of planning” for an estate transfer, placing the IRA in a trust could be “the easiest and simplest way” for an owner to lessen the taxes and RMDs for heirs in the future, de Leon noted in an interview.

“You never want to go to a client with the answer before you ask all of the questions — that’s kind of the mantra that I live by. You have to take the step back and understand your client and what your client’s objectives are,” she said. “You can really get some of the trusts out of the estate, so that you don’t have that first bite of the apple of the estate tax.”

READ MORE: How a life insurance strategy could save some wealthy estates millions

Estate taxes, the sunset date of many Tax Cuts and Jobs Act provisions and RMDs under the Secure Act have emerged as three complicated prongs of related planning questions that could occupy planners and their clients for several years. Just as it did the last time the IRS pushed back the beginning of RMDs this past summer, the question remains whether the agency will do so again next year. 

The wording in the IRS notice that the Secure Act rules “will apply” on or after the beginning of 2025 displays a notable difference with the ones bringing that relief in prior years by stating that the RMDs would have to begin “no earlier than the subsequent” year, certified public accountant Ed Zollars wrote on Kaplan Financial Education’s “Current Federal Tax Developments” blog.

“Such omissions have historically left the applicability of penalties in the following year ambiguous, with the IRS not specifying its expectations regarding the enforcement of these rules for distributions in that year,” Zollars wrote. “And, in fact, such penalties have not applied in those subsequent years. Instead, the current notice indicates that the final regulations are projected to be applicable for determining required minimum distributions for calendar years starting from January 1, 2025. Consequently, it is prudent for taxpayers to operate under the assumption that distributions are likely to be mandated for the tax year 2025 and beyond.”

In light of the eventual implementation of the 10-year distribution rules, IRA owners and their tax professionals could set up a charitable remainder trust (CRT) to be the beneficiary, Laufer said. That strategy comes with its own guidelines, such as restricting the annual payouts to heirs to between 5% and 50% of the trust’s value and other specific qualifications, he noted. 

“A CRT is a tax-exempt entity that can distribute an annuity based on a percentage of the annual fair-market value of the trust assets,” Laufer said. “The beneficiary of the CRT would retain the right to receive an annuity expressed as a percentage of the annual fair-market value of the trust’s assets. This annual annuity can be paid to individual beneficiaries for life or for a term up to 20 years. At the end of the CRT term any remaining trust property will pass to the designated qualified charitable beneficiaries.”

READ MORE: 26 tips on expiring Tax Cuts and Jobs Act provisions to review before 2026

The many family dynamics involved with estate planning often bring other factors into the mix around a decision about placing the assets in a trust, de Leon noted. Those may include the relative financial sophistication and well-being of one heir as compared to another, protecting assets in the event of a divorce or even concerns about substance abuse problems, she said.

“It’s really those kinds of issues — those emotional issues — that tend to lead people to trusts,” she said. “Those tend to be more the rationale for people these days. More of my conversations are about that than the tax consequences, frankly.”

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending