Connect with us

Accounting

SEC approves PCAOB rule amendment on deregistering audit firms

Published

on

The Securities and Exchange Commission has approved a rule amendment from the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board that allows the PCAOB to address situations in which a registered firm has ceased to exist, is nonoperational, or no longer wishes to remain registered.

That can occur when an auditing firm fails to file annual reports with the PCAOB on Form 2 and pay annual fees for at least two consecutive reporting years. The PCAOB adopted the rule amendment in November.

“We thank our SEC colleagues for their review and approval of this PCAOB rule amendment,” said PCAOB chair Erica Williams in a statement Thursday. “The amendment approved today will not only make PCAOB registration information more useful for investors, audit committees, and other stakeholders, it will also help our organization use its staff time and resources more efficiently and effectively. We also thank the commenters who provided us with valuable perspectives on this amendment. We look forward to monitoring its impact.”

The rule amendment includes a 60-day waiting period before finalizing a firm’s withdrawal, giving firms an opportunity to send notice of their intention to remain registered.

One of the sticking points among commenters involved audits of so-called emerging growth companies, and the SEC agreed with the PCAOB’s position on the need to audit the EGCs. The PCAOB said the EGCs are likely to be newer companies, with audit committees that have more limited experience in managing the process for finding and selecting a PCAOB-registered public accounting firm. 

“Removal of consecutively delinquent firms, that are likely to be non-existent, non-operational, or no longer wish to be registered, could help reduce the search costs associated with making this decision,” said the SEC. “Further, the PCAOB indicated that it had no reason to believe that registered firms providing services to EGCs will incur costs that are greater than those incurred by firms providing services to non-EGCs, which are, in either case, likely to be incremental for operating firms that wish to remain registered. The PCAOB also noted that commenters agreed that the proposals generally should apply to audits of EGCs and that excluding the application of the proposals from audits of EGCs would be inconsistent with protecting the public interest.”

The SEC found the rule amendment would establish an efficient procedural mechanism for the PCAOB to remove from registration firms that have ceased to exist, are non-operational, or no longer wish to remain registered. 

“We agree that, as the PCAOB explains, the presence of continuously delinquent firms on the PCAOB’s list of registered firms hinders several regulatory objectives, including its ability to maintain an accurate public record of registered public accounting firms in operation and that wish to remain registered; to ensure that the information required on annual reports is being reported to the public and the PCAOB; to collect mandatory annual fees; and to efficiently use PCAOB staff time and resources,” said the SEC. “The Amendment will provide the PCAOB with an efficient mechanism to achieve these regulatory goals, while, through various procedural safeguards, balancing the need for reasonable and fair notice to firms that do indeed wish to maintain their registration.”

The rule change could be withdrawn by the incoming Trump administration, which has warned against any last-minute regulatory changes by the outgoing Biden administration. PCAOB member Christina Ho cited that as one reason why she opposed the rule amendment.

Outgoing SEC chair Gary Gensler voted in favor of the rule amendment and plans to step down on Jan. 20, Inauguration Day. “I’m pleased to support this rule because it helps the PCAOB maintain an accurate public record of registered firms,” he said in a statement Thursday. “The new rule states that if a firm currently registered with the PCAOB fails to both file their required annual reports and pay their annual fees for two years in a row, a formal process to withdraw their registration would begin. If a firm isn’t filing statutory annual reports or paying their dues, it’s logical to presume the firm is inactive. Thus, it’s appropriate not to let such firms market themselves to the public as being registered with the PCAOB.

“I’m glad to see, though, that the new standard includes a 60-day waiting period before finalizing a firm’s withdrawal,” Gensler added. “During this time, firms will have an opportunity to send notice of their intention to remain registered.”

He pointed out that there are 1,544 public accounting firms currently registered with the PCAOB. Of these firms, though, 80 did not file annual reports on Form 2 and did not pay annual fees for 2022 and 2023. None of the 80 firms have issued an audit report for any public company issuer between Jan. 1, 2021, and Aug. 31, 2024.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending