Connect with us

Accounting

Senate GOP nears finish line on Trump’s big, beautiful bill

Published

on

Senate Republicans appear to be making progress in resolving differences over the so-called One Big Beautiful Bill Act with House Republicans, especially when it comes to the state and local tax deduction.

House Republicans had wanted to raise the so-called SALT cap from $10,000 to $40,000 with a phase-out for taxpayers earning over $500,000, but Senate Republicans opted to keep it at $10,000, although they have proposed alternatives such as raising it for five years. On Friday, they reportedly reached a deal to raise it to $40,000 for a five-year period.

“I think the bigger impact for our clients will depend on where the pass-through entity tax limitations land at the end of the day,” said Pamela Huelsman, a partner at Armanino Advisory, a Top 25 Firm based in San Ramon, California. “To me, that has more of an impact than the straight $40,000 or $10,000 limit.” 

The American Institute of CPAs has been pressing Congress to change the pass-through entity tax provision, arguing it could harm accountants, lawyers and other professional service providers.

“Basically, the current Senate version takes the cap from the original $10,000 up to $40,000 for business owners, and then the greater of $40,000 or 50% of the pass-through entity tax, plus the remainder of the $10,000 base to expand it for all businesses without affecting lawyers, accountants and dentists like the original bill,” said Steve Kralik, managing director of the tax national office at Armanino. 

Lobbying by the AICPA and other professional groups appears to have helped sway the Senate.

“Something must have worked, because the Senate version is very different than the House version,” said Simcha David, partner-in-charge of EisnerAmper’s financial services tax practice. “Under the House version, they tied who can use the pass-through entity tax to what’s called a specified services trade or business and you will not get a deduction, so to speak, for the pass-through. Everybody was up in arms saying it’s discriminatory, it’s not fair. What are they doing differently? Services businesses should have the same right to take advantage of the pass-through entity tax workaround that anybody else did. That was the House version. They raised the cap to $40,000 instead of $10,000 and then they put this out. The Senate version started by keeping the cap at $10,000, but for the pass-through entity tax, they created a new rule, and they said you’re entitled to the greater of $40,000 or 50% of the pass-through entity tax paid.”

He has also been keeping an eye on the changing rules under Section 461(l) for limitations on claiming excess business losses by noncorporate taxpayers.

“Basically what it said was you can only offset investment income by $500,000 of business losses,” said David. “Now the question is, what do I do with the extra losses? So if I had a million dollars in losses and a million dollars of investment income in a particular year, I would offset $500,000 of that investment income with $500,000 of business losses, and then I pay tax on $500,000 of investment income, and the extra $500,000 of business loss gets pushed to next year. The rule was that $500,000 which you push to next year now becomes what’s called an NOL, a net operating loss. What they’ve done now to 461(l) is they basically said, if you have excess losses in year one, they get pushed to year two. And again, you’re limited to $500,000 in year two. It doesn’t turn into an NOL.”

Now under 461(l), taxpayers  are limited to $500,000 to offset business loss against investment income on an annual basis. “It’s like a one-year deferral,” said David. “That’s how it was originally. Now it’s every year you’re limited to $500,000.”

On the international side, the Treasury announced Thursday that it would be dropping the so-called revenge tax on other countries that levy taxes on U.S. goods through mechanisms such as Pillar Two of the Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development’s base erosion and profit shifting action plan after negotiations with G7 countries. 

“It’s trying to convince countries to either repeal these so-called unfair foreign taxes, or at a minimum not apply them to U.S. companies and, importantly, also the foreign subsidiaries of U.S. companies,” said Jose Murillo, EY Americas international tax and transaction services leader. “That scope is consistent with what the White House has said, and congressional Republicans have said that they object to Pillar Two taxes applying to U.S. groups. Their position is U.S. groups and their foreign subs should be exempt entirely from Pillar Two.”

Not only the OECD rules are being targeted by the administration, but also digital services taxes. On Friday, President Trump announced that he was calling off trade discussions with Canada because its DST is scheduled to take effect on Monday.

Many other parts of the TCJA related to international taxes have been preserved in the bill.

“I think the positive things in this bill, on the international side, are it confirms that the basic structure, like the architecture of the international tax system as it was created by the TCJA, is here to stay,” said Murillo. “GILTI is here to stay. FDII is here to stay. The foreign tax credit regime is very, very complicated, but it’s here to stay, which provides certainty to a lot of companies.”

Other changes are being made in response to decisions by Senate Parliamentarian Elizabeth McDonough. On Friday, Senate Democrats announced additional provisions related to tax policy in the Senate Republican reconciliation bill violate the Senate’s Byrd Rule and would be subject to a 60-vote point of order threshold if included in the bill on the floor. These include additional requirements for taxpayers who claim the Earned Income Tax Credit to prove their child is eligible before parents could claim the credit; a new tax credit for contributions to “scholarship granting organizations” to establish a federal school voucher program; and a section exempting a small number of religious schools from an income tax on college endowments. 

Senate Finance Committee ranking member Ron Wyden, D-Oregon, noted Republicans may drop additional provisions, including a proposal to scrap the IRS Direct File program, in the face of parliamentary challenges by Senate Democrats. Other issues have yet to be decided, including Republicans’ use of a “current policy baseline” to minimize the cost of the legislation. 

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending