Today’s market for professional liability insurance is similar to markets in other industries in that it reflects the changes that the profession is undergoing. As the profession evolves, so does the market.
“As the CPA profession evolves and new services are offered, it makes for different risks,” explained Candace Coach, small firms sales manager at Aon, the manager for the AICPA Professional Liability Insurance program.
Among the factors to consider when shopping for a policy, she advises the prospective purchaser to consider whether the insurance carrier has the financial stability to take on the risk.
thodonal – stock.adobe.com
“For some carriers, the risk is too large, leading them to exit the market,” she said. “For example, we haven’t seen any claims yet for the beneficial ownership filing requirements, but it could result in large claims down the road. We are one of the only carriers that offer coverage for this; however some CPA firms will go ahead and offer these services and assume they are covered.”
Coach anticipates that claims will be coming in as a result of firms offering services for BOI filing.
“We don’t know what the claims will look like, but there are specific guidelines that have to be followed, which could result in exorbitant fines assessed against the filer. Clients will be looking to the CPA to pick up the fee or the fine. As far as the market is concerned, some carriers will feel as though it is best for them to non-renew certain policies, and exit the market altogether and downsize to less risky professional services.”
Prospective buyers should look for “premium modifiers” that can lower the cost of a policy. These include claims-free history, continuing education, and various types of “best practices.”
The liability market is softening up a little, according to Stephen Vono, senior vice president at McGowanPro.
“It’s still somewhat of a hard market in large metropolitan areas,” he said. “A hard market is when there is a lot of claim activity and premiums go up. In a soft market there is less claim activity and premiums go down. It depends on the kind of services that are offered. Cyber is a little on the hard side, but it is beginning to see some softening because insurers have become better at underwriting guidelines in the last few years.”
“You should look for a carrier with an AM Best rating of ‘A’ or better,” said John Raspante, CPA, senior risk manager at McGowanPro. “It’s also best to get a carrier that has been in the space for at least five years. If they’re in it for five years or more, they’re familiar with the types of claims, policy limits, and other factors that might affect the decision.”
“In pricing a policy, they look at a number of factors,” he explained. “These include total revenue, loss history, number of staff, and areas of practice. Always look at ‘outside the policy’ options. If you have a million-dollar policy, legal expenses can exceed that very quickly, so it might be a good idea to get an extra million just for legal and defense costs. A traditional policy is inside the limit. If you have a $1 million policy, $250,000 in legal fees will reduce the limit to $750,000. So I recommend an outside-the-limit policy to cover legal and defense expenses, to preserve the underlying $1 million. It does cost more, but I recommend a buyer to go for the outside-the-limit addition if the difference in premium is not significant.”
Although it may not be particularly entertaining, it is important to actually read the policy, Raspante urged.
“You need to read the policy, especially the endorsements,” he said. “They either weaken or toughen the policy. If it says that in addition to the underlying coverage it will also apply to employment practice, that increases the insurer’s exposure. It may throw in a sublimit for nonprofessional liability exposure that doesn’t cover the full limit — that’s why you need to read the whole policy. When you get close to the end it looks like a lot of legalese, but you have to read the entire document. For example, on the last page there might be a service exclusion for international work, which means that anything outside the U.S. is not covered.”
The panel of experts put together by McGowanPro’s Vono, which includes underwriter Gary Sutherland, Anthony Carolei, the risk manager for Hanover Insurance, and CPA defense attorney Ralph Picardi, recommends the following factors to consider when assessing liability policies:
Make sure the professional services definition is as broad as possible.
Does the broker or insurance company understand what you do?
Consider if your limits are sufficient, as legal defense costs are going up.
Is your deductible appropriate? If you have a large deductible, will you struggle to pay that deductible in the event of a claim?
Does the broker or insurance company provide supportive risk management services and education?
Do not rely on your professional liability insurance policy to be the coverage for all your exposure. There are exposures that are better covered on a separate standalone insurance policy. Separate directors & officers liability insurance and separate cyber liability, employment practices liability, commercial crime, and fiduciary liability policies should be considered to cover all exposures for your firm.
As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.
Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.
The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.
However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.
WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.
The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.
Untested Legal Mechanism
To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.
White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.
Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.
“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.
USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs
Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).
However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:
Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
Potash and critical minerals
Fish and seafood
Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)
Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.
Canadian Response and Market Reaction
Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.
Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.
Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.
With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.
The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.
The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.
Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.
However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.