Connect with us

Accounting

Small accounting firms aren’t off the DEI hook

Published

on

Some smaller accounting firms are in denial that they have a major role to play in advancing diversity, equity and inclusion in the accounting profession.

One-third of micro and 13% of small firms say DEI is not a necessary part of their strategy, according to research by the Center for Accounting Transformation. Meanwhile, large firms think they are near the end of the DEI journey: About one-third say they are in the “refining” stage (measuring the impact and refining their programs/initiatives) or the “integrated” stage (DEI is interwoven into the operating fabric of their organization). Another 26% say they are in the “implementing” stage (implementing their initial programs/initiatives).

By and large, experts agree there is still much more work to be done on the DEI front. 

Donny Shimamoto, founder of CPA firm IntrapriseTechKnowlogies and the Center for Accounting Transformation, says that among small firms there is a sense of “this doesn’t really apply to us; this is for big organizations,” and “we can’t have representation; we’re too small.” 

So what can small firms do, with the limited resources they have, to advance DEI? 

Change, past future

Kimberly Ellison-Taylor, the former chair of the American Institute of CPAs’ National Commission on Diversity and Inclusion, says small firms should view their size as their strength: They have an advantage in that there’s less bureaucracy — they can make changes and implement policies in the office without getting caught up in red tape. 

She said firms should not underestimate the value of flexibility. Diversity encompasses race, ethnicity and gender, but it also includes parental status, neurodiversity, socioeconomic status, physical ability or disability, and more. Offering hybrid or remote schedules, or offering reduced hour requirements, can be a deciding factor for potential employees choosing between firms. 

“Play to your strengths and use that to get them to come and work with you,” Ellison-Taylor said. “It might not follow any conventional model that you’ve ever heard of, but why not start one?”

It’s important for DEI to be a tone set from the top.

“In order for staff to really have buy-in, they like to see that their leaders are actually bought into the various initiatives or the culture of the firm,” said Trevor Williams, audit partner and director of DEI at GRF CPAs in Bethesda, Maryland.

“There’s only so much growth that your firm can do if everybody looks like and thinks like the same cookie cutter,” Williams continued. “You can’t be successful in today’s environment with that type of belief.”

Diverse leadership brings different perspectives to the table. 

“If everybody has the same opinion, you’re not going to get the right answer,” said Lexy Kessler, vice chairman of the AICPA and mid-Atlantic managing partner of Top 100 Firm Aprio. “If you have people with different opinions and different backgrounds coming into conversation, then you get to the right answer.”

DEI can improve a firm’s bottom line. 

“We work in accounting. If we can start showing people that by continuing their efforts in inclusive initiatives in their firm — that the metrics will get better — I think that they will keep going with it,” said Sandra Wiley, president of Boomer Consulting. “But I think we’ve got to turn the attention to not just what some firm leaders would call fluff and talk about the numbers. Talk about profitability, talk about how many innovative ideas are coming up, talk about the collaboration between teams about engagement, and attracting and retaining good people.”

But it’s up to firms to make change happen. “You can’t wait and hope for the best,” said Anoop Mehta, past chair of the AICPA and current chair of the AICPA NCDI. “You have to put processes in place, and you have to be intentional about it.”

Experts say that now is not the time to pull back. Doing so risks alienating not only diverse talent but also the growing Gen Z workforce who highly value their companies’ stances on critical social issues. 

“Pulling back is only going to position your firm as being run by people that don’t care about this kind of stuff,” said Bonnie Buol Ruszczyk, president and manager of the Accounting MOVE Project. “They don’t care about their employees. They don’t care about reaching people outside of the majority of firm employees.”

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending