Connect with us

Accounting

State child tax credits held down kids poverty rates, study shows

Published

on

The dozen U.S. states that implemented a refundable child tax credit program in the wake of the pandemic held down child poverty rates relative to states that didn’t act, according to an analysis by Columbia University’s Center on Poverty and Social Policy.

The research evaluated how many children were projected to be lifted out of poverty because of the state initiatives, and how that compared with the impact from a one-year Covid-era federal program that expired at the end of 2021.

Many of the state-level credits were set in place or expanded as it became clear Congress wouldn’t quickly come to a consensus on continuing with the enlarged federal benefit. The state credits are much smaller in size, have stricter income limits than the federal credits and often exclude older children.

Still, the analysis suggests they helped mitigate the loss of expanded federal aid for many families. In a comparable year, Minnesota’s credit of as much as $1,750 per child up to age 17 would move 13,000 children out of poverty – nearly half of the estimated 31,000 if the federal credit had remained in place. Minnesota provides an added tax break for older children.

Vermont’s program also had a notable impact, while California and Illinois would move a fraction of kids out of poverty compared with the federal credit, according to the data, which was compiled for Bloomberg News.

“This is going to have a smaller effect than you might expect for the federal policy, but there are families that are still benefiting under this,” said Ryan Vinh, a research analyst at the Columbia CPSP. “Like families with young children that are in deep poverty, you might see them lifted out of deep poverty, which we would define as being below half of the poverty line.”

The study offers some hindsight into various initiatives now that Republicans have included a federal child tax credit of as much as $2,200 in their recently enacted fiscal package — saying the expansion will do more to help working families. The new credit isn’t fully refundable, meaning low-income families who owe little or nothing in taxes to the government generally wouldn’t get the higher value, according to an analysis from the Yale Budget Lab.

Back in 2021, the fully refundable credit of up to $3,600 provided in the “American rescue plan” helped bring child poverty rates to a record low of 5.2%. However, the scope of the credit made it costly for the federal government.

Poverty surge

After it expired, 12 states created or expanded their own versions of a refundable credit. Five other states have implemented nonrefundable credits.

National child poverty surged back up after the federal program ended. The rate stood at 13.7% in 2023, according to the latest data available from the Census Bureau, which uses varying income thresholds depending on family size and composition for its definition. Last year, one measure of the poverty level for a household with two adults and two children was roughly $39,000. 

Columbia University’s CPSP has compiled a more timely gauge, using a different method. Their tracker showed some 22.5% of children were living in poverty as of December, up from 14.7% during the same month four years ago.

The CPSP data showed that Colorado’s program was projected to move the most children out of poverty compared to the “American Rescue Plan” credit — 36,000 versus the 41,000 lifted by the federal program if it had remained in place. But that was partially due to the fact that the state offers an additional tax break for families on top of the child tax credit in years when the state has a surplus of revenue.

‘Lifesaver’ aid

Other states like Massachusetts, which offers a much smaller credit up to $440 per child who is younger than 13, had some impact, but were projected to have moved fewer children out of poverty.

Huong Vu, a 40-year old Massachusetts resident, said the monthly payments from the 2021 expanded credit were a “lifesaver” for her family, which includes her husband and daughters now aged 12 and 13. It allowed her family to cover more than just basic needs when Vu’s job was made part-time during the pandemic.

Since then, the Massachusetts credit implemented in 2023 has helped Vu’s family amid higher prices for everyday expenses, including groceries and gas. It’s also enabled sending her children to summer and sports programs they otherwise wouldn’t be able to join.

President Donald Trump’s “One Big Beautiful Bill” boosted the federal credit for tax filers to up to $2,200 per eligible child, which will be adjusted annually for inflation starting in 2026. That’s up from the $2,000 maximum temporarily enacted in the 2017 tax law that would have been halved at the end of 2025.

Of the total, $1,700 will be refundable for the 2025 tax year, which is the amount that can be received if the credit exceeds the amount of taxes owed.

Earlier this year, Senator Josh Hawley of Missouri proposed increasing the credit to up to $5,000 per child while allowing parents to receive the credit in monthly checks, similar to the pandemic-era version. His plan also would have applied the credit to payroll taxes, which could have increased the benefit for some low-income households. 

Hawley said while the new expansion is “better than nothing” and praised it for being indexed to inflation, Republicans will need to do more for working families, including another child tax credit expansion in a future bill.

“It’s one of the best ways to get tax relief to working people,” Hawley said.

Julie Cai, an economist at the Center for Economic and Policy Research, a progressive think tank, said a more substantial expansion of the child tax credit could benefit the hardest-hit families.

“Within a year, a lot of people might lose jobs or have a relatively small spell of unemployment,” Cai said. “How we can provide measures to buffer the type of negative consequences from their unemployment spell will be crucial.”

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending