Connect with us

Accounting

Steps to take as bonus depreciation phases down

Published

on

As we enter the beginning of 2025, bonus depreciation continues to leverage down as more portions of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act expire. Bonus depreciation was one of the significant provisions in the TCJA, with 100% bonus depreciation by the end of 2022. Unfortunately, this was a temporary provision, and the amount of bonus depreciation started leveraging down by 20% per year in 2023; going into 2025, the bonus depreciation rate will be 40%.

To understand how to make decisions, it is essential to understand how bonus depreciation works. Bonus depreciation is an acceleration of depreciation adjustments into the first year. Eligible property includes assets with a life of 20 years or less. This can include personal property, land improvements and qualified improvement property. Critical to the availability of bonus depreciation for many taxpayers is that the TCJA extended bonus depreciation to used and new property. This means a taxpayer purchasing an existing warehouse can use bonus depreciation to accelerate the land improvements, such as the parking lot and any personal property acquired along with the property.

Unfortunately, with bonus leveraging down, the value of this accelerated depreciation deduction is lessened. Going into 2025, the bonus depreciation rate is only 40%; this means that a taxpayer who purchases a parking lot for $100,000 would get a $40,000 bonus depreciation expense, and the remaining $60,000 would be depreciated over 15 years at a 150% declining balance method.  

One of the main goals of the incoming administration is to bring back the TCJA policies; this will likely include reinstatement of 100% bonus depreciation moving forward. It is important to note that this will likely only impact assets acquired after the law is enacted. If we look at past extensions of bonus depreciation, they have been prospective only. For example, when the TCJA came out in 2017, property acquired after Sept. 27, 2017 was eligible for 100% bonus depreciation. However, assets acquired before that date were subject to the old rules. What does this mean for businesses in 2025? 

Unfortunately, businesses acquiring assets before the anticipated announcement of the new regulations will most likely be subject to the current bonus depreciation amounts. Even if a taxpayer delays placing an asset in service, they will most likely be subject to the current rules, as the new law will look at when the taxpayer was under contract or started construction.

For taxpayers completing projects in early 2025 or even 2024, what are some options to expand the value of expensing? One option for many taxpayers is to look closely at 179 expensing. Section 179 allows taxpayers to deduct the cost of qualifying improvements immediately, including personal property and some real property, including qualified improvement property, roof replacements and HVAC replacements, when installed on nonresidential real property. However, like all good things, 179 has restrictions. Section 179 is limited to $1,000,000 indexed for inflation; for 2024, this inflation increase means up to $1,220,000 in eligible assets qualify.

One of the biggest issues is that not all investments are eligible for 179; first, Section 179 of the code limits the use if a business acquires more than $2,500,000, indexed for inflation, of eligible assets. The bigger restriction for many investors is that 179 is limited to assets used to create income “from a trade or business.” This traditionally means that assets held simply for an investment will not qualify for this deduction. Under Publication 946, the IRS states that “investment property, rental property (if renting property is not your trade or business), and property that produces royalties” do not qualify.

So, what are taxpayers to do in 2025? The first thing is that taxpayers who qualify for 179 must consider 179 when completing their taxes. Making sure to maximize 179 over bonus depreciation can make a massive difference in the tax liability for individuals. The other thing taxpayers should do is look to maximize their eligible property through cost segregation or other depreciation analyses to make sure they are getting every dollar of deduction to come their way.

What should taxpayers not do in 2025? Right now, the biggest mistake taxpayers can make is to wait for Congress to act on a new tax bill before moving forward. As mentioned above, the likelihood is that any tax bill will change these items only in a prospective manner. Waiting for a tax law change for most taxpayers will have little effect on assets they are already under contract to acquire. While a tax bill could affect future investments, it will most likely not affect 2024 tax planning or investments in early 2025.

While tax policy could change dramatically in 2025 under the new administration, understanding the interaction of 179 and bonus depreciation can drastically affect outcomes in 2024 and 2025 tax returns. While planning for changes in the Tax Code can be beneficial, taxpayers must also look at how to maximize savings based on the current law.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending