Connect with us

Accounting

Steps to take as bonus depreciation phases down

Published

on

As we enter the beginning of 2025, bonus depreciation continues to leverage down as more portions of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act expire. Bonus depreciation was one of the significant provisions in the TCJA, with 100% bonus depreciation by the end of 2022. Unfortunately, this was a temporary provision, and the amount of bonus depreciation started leveraging down by 20% per year in 2023; going into 2025, the bonus depreciation rate will be 40%.

To understand how to make decisions, it is essential to understand how bonus depreciation works. Bonus depreciation is an acceleration of depreciation adjustments into the first year. Eligible property includes assets with a life of 20 years or less. This can include personal property, land improvements and qualified improvement property. Critical to the availability of bonus depreciation for many taxpayers is that the TCJA extended bonus depreciation to used and new property. This means a taxpayer purchasing an existing warehouse can use bonus depreciation to accelerate the land improvements, such as the parking lot and any personal property acquired along with the property.

Unfortunately, with bonus leveraging down, the value of this accelerated depreciation deduction is lessened. Going into 2025, the bonus depreciation rate is only 40%; this means that a taxpayer who purchases a parking lot for $100,000 would get a $40,000 bonus depreciation expense, and the remaining $60,000 would be depreciated over 15 years at a 150% declining balance method.  

One of the main goals of the incoming administration is to bring back the TCJA policies; this will likely include reinstatement of 100% bonus depreciation moving forward. It is important to note that this will likely only impact assets acquired after the law is enacted. If we look at past extensions of bonus depreciation, they have been prospective only. For example, when the TCJA came out in 2017, property acquired after Sept. 27, 2017 was eligible for 100% bonus depreciation. However, assets acquired before that date were subject to the old rules. What does this mean for businesses in 2025? 

Unfortunately, businesses acquiring assets before the anticipated announcement of the new regulations will most likely be subject to the current bonus depreciation amounts. Even if a taxpayer delays placing an asset in service, they will most likely be subject to the current rules, as the new law will look at when the taxpayer was under contract or started construction.

For taxpayers completing projects in early 2025 or even 2024, what are some options to expand the value of expensing? One option for many taxpayers is to look closely at 179 expensing. Section 179 allows taxpayers to deduct the cost of qualifying improvements immediately, including personal property and some real property, including qualified improvement property, roof replacements and HVAC replacements, when installed on nonresidential real property. However, like all good things, 179 has restrictions. Section 179 is limited to $1,000,000 indexed for inflation; for 2024, this inflation increase means up to $1,220,000 in eligible assets qualify.

One of the biggest issues is that not all investments are eligible for 179; first, Section 179 of the code limits the use if a business acquires more than $2,500,000, indexed for inflation, of eligible assets. The bigger restriction for many investors is that 179 is limited to assets used to create income “from a trade or business.” This traditionally means that assets held simply for an investment will not qualify for this deduction. Under Publication 946, the IRS states that “investment property, rental property (if renting property is not your trade or business), and property that produces royalties” do not qualify.

So, what are taxpayers to do in 2025? The first thing is that taxpayers who qualify for 179 must consider 179 when completing their taxes. Making sure to maximize 179 over bonus depreciation can make a massive difference in the tax liability for individuals. The other thing taxpayers should do is look to maximize their eligible property through cost segregation or other depreciation analyses to make sure they are getting every dollar of deduction to come their way.

What should taxpayers not do in 2025? Right now, the biggest mistake taxpayers can make is to wait for Congress to act on a new tax bill before moving forward. As mentioned above, the likelihood is that any tax bill will change these items only in a prospective manner. Waiting for a tax law change for most taxpayers will have little effect on assets they are already under contract to acquire. While a tax bill could affect future investments, it will most likely not affect 2024 tax planning or investments in early 2025.

While tax policy could change dramatically in 2025 under the new administration, understanding the interaction of 179 and bonus depreciation can drastically affect outcomes in 2024 and 2025 tax returns. While planning for changes in the Tax Code can be beneficial, taxpayers must also look at how to maximize savings based on the current law.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Global ESG Reporting Standards and Double Materiality Compliance

Published

on

Corporate accounting departments face expanding reporting expectations as international sustainability disclosure standards achieve regulatory enforcement across major global jurisdictions. Chief Accounting Officers (CAOs) and corporate controllers are establishing rigorous internal accounting controls to treat Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) metrics with the same data precision, auditability, and governance as traditional financial statements.

Regulatory Harmonization Under Global Sustainability Frameworks
The implementation of standardized sustainability reporting frameworks—notably rules established by international sustainability accounting boards—has created unified expectations for public and large private enterprises. Corporations must report standardized metrics covering greenhouse gas emissions (Scope 1, 2, and material Scope 3), energy utilization, workforce demographics, and supply chain governance.

In Europe and other participating international jurisdictions, double materiality principles are mandatory. Under double materiality, organizations must report both how external sustainability risks impact corporate financial performance, and how internal corporate operations affect surrounding environmental and social structures.

Integrating Sustainability Metrics into Core ERP Systems
To provide auditable non-financial data, enterprise organizations are integrating specialized carbon accounting and ESG management platforms directly into core ERP systems. Automated data collectors capture energy utility invoices, logistics fuel consumption metrics, and vendor compliance records in real time.

Establishing automated, traceable data pipelines ensures that non-financial reporting is supported by clear audit trails. This structured approach allows external financial auditors to provide reasonable assurance on sustainability disclosures during annual corporate reporting cycles.

Financial Impacts and Capital Market Disclosure
Accurate ESG reporting directly influences corporate cost of capital and institutional credit ratings. Commercial lenders and institutional asset managers systematically incorporate sustainability metrics into risk pricing models. Companies that demonstrate transparent, verifiable progress in operational energy efficiency and climate risk mitigation benefit from expanded access to green bond markets and lower debt pricing.

Action Steps for Accounting Leadership
1. Implement Double Materiality Frameworks: Conduct comprehensive assessments to identify material financial and operational sustainability metrics.
2. Build Auditable Non-Financial Data Pipelines: Automate ESG data collection within core accounting software to ensure data integrity.
3. Align Sustainability with Annual Financial Filings: Prepare non-financial disclosures concurrently with financial statements to satisfy regulatory audit expectations.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Modernizing Internal Controls: Machine Learning and Continuous Monitoring in Auditing

Published

on

Internal audit departments and corporate risk managers are modernizing internal control frameworks by shifting from periodic sampling techniques to continuous monitoring and machine learning analytics. As operational data volumes increase across enterprise organizations, automated control testing ensures financial integrity, prevents corporate fraud, and streamlines annual audit engagements.

The Limitation of Periodic Audit Sampling
Historically, internal and external auditors evaluated internal controls by reviewing random samples of financial transactions—often analyzing less than five percent of total ledger entries. In complex enterprise environments, periodic sampling methods carry inherent risks of overlooking localized financial misstatements, unauthorized disbursements, or operational control breakdowns.

In 2026, progressive internal audit functions are utilizing automated continuous monitoring platforms that evaluate one hundred percent of financial transactions in real time. Continuous control auditing systems continuously monitor general ledger entries, procurement approvals, and expense reimbursements across all operating subsidiaries.

AI-Powered Fraud Detection and Anomaly Identification
Machine learning models trained on historical corporate financial data excel at identifying subtle transactional anomalies that indicate potential fraud or operational error. Automated systems instantly flag duplicate invoice payments, unapproved vendor creation, unusual journal entry timing, and unauthorized override of authority thresholds.

When an anomaly is detected, the automated auditing platform generates an instant risk alert, allowing internal audit teams to investigate root causes immediately. Early detection prevents minor operational errors from escalating into material weaknesses in financial reporting.

Streamlining External Audit Preparation
Continuous internal control monitoring delivers significant benefits during annual external financial audits. External audit firms can review continuous audit logs and automated control testing documentation, reducing the time required for manual field testing.

This integrated approach lowers overall audit compliance fees, reduces administrative burdens on corporate accounting staff, and provides senior management and audit committees with real-time visibility into the organization’s overall risk profile.

Core Implementation Guidelines
1. Transition to 100% Data Testing: Replace legacy sampling methods with automated continuous audit monitoring systems.
2. Deploy Anomaly Detection Algorithms: Implement machine learning models to identify unauthorized transactions and operational control overrides.
3. Align Internal and External Audit Workflows: Coordinate continuous control testing protocols with external auditors to optimize annual compliance cycles.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Tax Compliance and Global Regulatory Harmonization in 2026

Published

on

Corporate tax accounting departments are navigating an era of unprecedented regulatory complexity as global tax harmonization frameworks take full effect alongside real-time digital tax reporting mandates. Tax directors and accounting teams are adopting cloud-based tax compliance automation tools to manage multi-jurisdictional tax liabilities and satisfy stringent reporting rules across international jurisdictions.

Implementation of Global Minimum Tax Provisions
The implementation of international tax reform agreements—notably the Pillar Two global minimum tax framework—has reshaped multinational corporate tax planning. Multinational enterprises with consolidated revenues exceeding established thresholds must ensure an effective tax rate of at least 15% across every jurisdiction in which they operate.

Accounting teams are implementing specialized tax calculation modules integrated directly into enterprise resource planning (ERP) platforms. These automated tools calculate effective tax rates per country, identify top-up tax liabilities, and generate standardized compliance documentation required by national tax authorities.

Real-Time Digital Invoicing and E-Reporting Mandates
Tax authorities across Europe, Latin America, and Asia-Pacific have enacted mandatory electronic invoicing (e-invoicing) and continuous transaction controls (CTC). Under these systems, corporate transaction data must be submitted electronically to government portals in real time at the point of sale or invoice issuance.

This shift toward continuous digital tax reporting eliminates traditional annual tax audits in favor of ongoing automated compliance monitoring. Accounting departments are upgrading invoicing software to ensure seamless XML data formatting, digital signature authentication, and real-time validation against tax authority databases.

Automation and Data Analytics in Corporate Tax Strategy
To keep pace with dynamic tax legislation, tax departments are transitioning from reactive compliance teams to proactive strategic advisors. Machine learning algorithms analyze corporate transactional data to identify tax credits, research and development (R&D) incentives, and cross-border transfer pricing adjustments.

By automating routine tax return filings and calculations, corporate tax directors can focus on long-term capital structuring, evaluating the tax implications of corporate mergers, and optimizing international supply chain networks.

Strategic Priorities for Tax Executives
1. ERP System Upgrades: Ensure enterprise software is capable of generating real-time, granular tax data required for global minimum tax compliance.
2. E-Invoicing Integration: Implement scalable e-invoicing platforms to satisfy regional continuous transaction control regulations.
3. Strategic Tax Analytics: Utilize predictive tax modeling tools to evaluate structural changes in corporate operations and cross-border trade.

Continue Reading

Trending