Connect with us

Accounting

Synapse crisis aftermath shows ledgers are key

Published

2 years ago

on

Synapse, a banking-as-a-service (BaaS) company, filed for bankruptcy in April of this year after a year of financial and operational challenges, including disputes with its banking partners, two rounds of layoffs, and an incident where many Synapse customers were unable to access their accounts.

The Chapter 11 trustee appointed to oversee Synapse’s bankruptcy has struggled to reconcile all funds, with potential shortfalls between $65 million and $96 million. Partner banks have made progress in distributing funds, but significant discrepancies in Synapse’s records complicate full reconciliation efforts. According to a recent status report filed by the trustee, full reconciliation may be impossible.

This development has shed light on a troubling phenomenon: many cutting-edge fintech companies, which bring much-needed disruption to a sector that has stagnated for decades, still lack the essential infrastructure to effectively reconcile transactions, track funds, and maintain visibility into their ledgers.

Synapse’s crisis underscores this pervasive issue in fintech and highlights the urgent need for investment in technology and automated processes.

A Prevalent Problem

The Chapter 11 trustee has encountered significant challenges in reconciling funds and ensuring accurate distribution to customers. These efforts have been hampered by missing data and uncooperative former employees.

Despite making some progress in distributing funds from demand deposit accounts (DDAs), the trustee faces substantial hurdles in reconciling more complex “for benefit of” (FBO) accounts, where discrepancies in Synapse’s records have complicated efforts. Partner banks have identified numerous discrepancies in Synapse Brokerage’s program ledgers, further complicating the reconciliation process.

These challenges are not unique to Synapse and underscore a broader issue within the fintech industry: the struggle to maintain robust financial infrastructure capable of reconciling transactions and safeguarding customer funds. 

Despite their commitment to tech-driven efficiency, many large fintechs face significant challenges when it comes to managing key tasks such as reconciling payments and maintaining accurate ledgers. As these problems persist, they draw greater scrutiny from regulators, potential banking partners step back, investors raise more questions and most importantly, fintechs lose the most critical thing for every company that handles money – consumer trust.

Reconciliation and Ledgering Challenges

Why exactly are these seemingly standard financial processes so difficult?

First, fintech companies – and most businesses in general – lack the necessary technology to handle reconciliation at scale. While fintechs are known for digitizing and automating their own services and products, most of them tend to rely on antiquated manual systems to manage internal processes such as reconciliation, using Excel held together by a patchwork of macros and SQL scripts. Many companies delay addressing this issue until it becomes unmanageable.

Second, these fintechs handle extremely high volumes of transactions and complex flows of funds —e.g., pay-ins and pay-outs and a growing number of data sources connected to each flow of funds (banks, PSPs, ERPs, billing systems, internal databases etc.) – which further complicates ledger management. The risk of error increases exponentially, and when something goes wrong, simply tracking a single transaction and identifying the break in the chain can be a Herculean task.

And third, even if an individual company has a strong handle on its internal ledgering, there’s still the risk that its partners’ or customers’ bookkeeping standards may not meet the same level of rigor, potentially leading to inconsistencies when multiple companies collaborate.

The Stakes of Inaccurate Ledgering

In Synapse’s case, these challenges converged to deliver the final blow. The trustee’s inability to reconcile accounts exacerbated internal financial issues and disputes with key partners, exposing gaps that have strained Synapse’s relationships with customers, partners, investors, and more.  Due to the high stakes, accurate reconciliation is crucial for fintech companies. Losing track of customers’ money diminishes trust and business viability. Without the ability to track funds, protecting customers’ financial security becomes impossible.

With Synapse’s recent shortcomings bringing these issues under the spotlight, regulators are beginning to impose even stricter oversight over fintechs and their partner banks. Companies that fail to effectively manage their ledgering and reconciliation processes risk severe consequences, including financial losses, reputational damage and harming their relationships with partner banks.

The Solution: Technology and Automation

Though the finance operations sector has long been neglected, a new generation of tools is available to help fintech companies manage reconciliation and ledgering more effectively. These advanced technologies can handle high transaction volumes and complex fund flows, providing real-time visibility, a high level of accuracy, and operational efficiency.

To avoid the pitfalls experienced by Synapse, fintech companies should, first and foremost, prioritize minimizing or eliminating the risk of losing track of customers’ funds. This requires  investing in advanced technology that seamlessly integrates into their operations, automates critical processes, and streamlines operations prone to inconsistencies and discrepancies. 

Automated reconciliation systems offer several benefits, beginning with real-time accuracy. These systems ensure that transactions are accurately matched and discrepancies promptly identified, reducing the risk of errors. Automated reconciliation also streamlines financial processes, minimizing the manual workload. This not only frees up employees to focus on more pressing tasks but also enables more efficient scaling of operations, while reducing the number of human errors.

The ability to maintain accurate and transparent financial records in real time will bolster customer trust and loyalty and ensure compliance with financial regulations by providing accurate and timely financial data.

Another advantage is resilience and adaptability. Automated systems can quickly adapt to changing financial environments and regulatory requirements, providing a stable foundation for growth.

Learning from Past Mistakes

Though difficult for those involved, the Synapse crisis ultimately offers hopeful lessons for the fintech industry. Investing in technology and automation is crucial to prevent similar crises and secure long-term success. These investments are essential for maintaining accurate financial records, building customer trust, ensuring regulatory compliance, and achieving operational efficiency. By learning from Synapse’s challenges and embracing advanced technology to mitigate them, fintech companies can safeguard their operations and position themselves for future success in an industry where competition continues to be fierce.

Related Topics:
Continue Reading

Accounting

AI-Driven Automation and Continuous Accounting Frameworks

Published

11 hours ago

on

August 15, 2026

By

The accounting profession is undergoing a fundamental structural transition as enterprise finance departments shift from periodic month-end closes toward automated continuous accounting models. By integrating specialized machine learning algorithms directly into enterprise resource planning (ERP) platforms, chief accounting officers are transforming financial reporting from a retrospective exercise into a real-time operational asset.

The Shift from Periodic Close to Continuous Financial Reporting
Traditional accounting workflows heavily relied on manual data reconciliation, spreadsheet calculations, and multi-week closing cycles at the end of each fiscal period. In contrast, continuous accounting frameworks utilize automated software agents to process, validate, and post transactional data in real time as business activities occur.

Automated bank reconciliation tools cross-reference incoming bank feeds, invoice records, and purchase orders automatically. By resolving transactional variances instantly throughout the month, corporate accounting teams eliminate the traditional workload spikes associated with quarterly and annual closes.

Machine Learning in Audit Trails and Anomaly Detection
Advanced natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning tools are redefining internal audit and financial control environments. Automated systems analyze 100% of general ledger entries, identifying anomalous transactions, duplicate payments, and unauthorized journal entries in real time.

Rather than relying on random statistical sampling, corporate internal auditors can focus their attention on high-risk flags automatically surfaced by algorithmic monitoring platforms. This continuous risk assessment strengthens internal controls over financial reporting (ICFR) and significantly reduces fraud risk.

Evolving Roles for Accounting Professionals
As routine data entry and manual reconciliation tasks become fully automated, the skill set required for accounting professionals is shifting toward data analysis, system design, and strategic business advisory.
– Systems Governance: Accountants are increasingly responsible for monitoring algorithmic accuracy and managing data integration pipelines.
– Business Partnership: Finance professionals leverage real-time financial dashboards to advise operational leaders on margin management and working capital allocation.
– Regulatory Compliance Management: Accounting teams utilize automated platforms to ensure compliance with dynamic tax codes and international accounting standards.

Core Implementation Recommendations
1. Deploy Automated Reconciliation Tools: Integrate continuous transaction processing modules into existing enterprise ERP architectures.
2. Establish Algorithmic Governance Controls: Implement strict internal testing protocols to ensure automated accounting rules comply with GAAP/IFRS standards.
3. Reskill Accounting Teams: Invest in training finance staff on data analytics, workflow automation, and predictive financial modeling.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Global ESG Reporting Standards and Double Materiality Compliance

Published

6 days ago

on

August 9, 2026

By

Corporate accounting departments face expanding reporting expectations as international sustainability disclosure standards achieve regulatory enforcement across major global jurisdictions. Chief Accounting Officers (CAOs) and corporate controllers are establishing rigorous internal accounting controls to treat Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) metrics with the same data precision, auditability, and governance as traditional financial statements.

Regulatory Harmonization Under Global Sustainability Frameworks
The implementation of standardized sustainability reporting frameworks—notably rules established by international sustainability accounting boards—has created unified expectations for public and large private enterprises. Corporations must report standardized metrics covering greenhouse gas emissions (Scope 1, 2, and material Scope 3), energy utilization, workforce demographics, and supply chain governance.

In Europe and other participating international jurisdictions, double materiality principles are mandatory. Under double materiality, organizations must report both how external sustainability risks impact corporate financial performance, and how internal corporate operations affect surrounding environmental and social structures.

Integrating Sustainability Metrics into Core ERP Systems
To provide auditable non-financial data, enterprise organizations are integrating specialized carbon accounting and ESG management platforms directly into core ERP systems. Automated data collectors capture energy utility invoices, logistics fuel consumption metrics, and vendor compliance records in real time.

Establishing automated, traceable data pipelines ensures that non-financial reporting is supported by clear audit trails. This structured approach allows external financial auditors to provide reasonable assurance on sustainability disclosures during annual corporate reporting cycles.

Financial Impacts and Capital Market Disclosure
Accurate ESG reporting directly influences corporate cost of capital and institutional credit ratings. Commercial lenders and institutional asset managers systematically incorporate sustainability metrics into risk pricing models. Companies that demonstrate transparent, verifiable progress in operational energy efficiency and climate risk mitigation benefit from expanded access to green bond markets and lower debt pricing.

Action Steps for Accounting Leadership
1. Implement Double Materiality Frameworks: Conduct comprehensive assessments to identify material financial and operational sustainability metrics.
2. Build Auditable Non-Financial Data Pipelines: Automate ESG data collection within core accounting software to ensure data integrity.
3. Align Sustainability with Annual Financial Filings: Prepare non-financial disclosures concurrently with financial statements to satisfy regulatory audit expectations.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Modernizing Internal Controls: Machine Learning and Continuous Monitoring in Auditing

Published

1 week ago

on

August 5, 2026

By

Internal audit departments and corporate risk managers are modernizing internal control frameworks by shifting from periodic sampling techniques to continuous monitoring and machine learning analytics. As operational data volumes increase across enterprise organizations, automated control testing ensures financial integrity, prevents corporate fraud, and streamlines annual audit engagements.

The Limitation of Periodic Audit Sampling
Historically, internal and external auditors evaluated internal controls by reviewing random samples of financial transactions—often analyzing less than five percent of total ledger entries. In complex enterprise environments, periodic sampling methods carry inherent risks of overlooking localized financial misstatements, unauthorized disbursements, or operational control breakdowns.

In 2026, progressive internal audit functions are utilizing automated continuous monitoring platforms that evaluate one hundred percent of financial transactions in real time. Continuous control auditing systems continuously monitor general ledger entries, procurement approvals, and expense reimbursements across all operating subsidiaries.

AI-Powered Fraud Detection and Anomaly Identification
Machine learning models trained on historical corporate financial data excel at identifying subtle transactional anomalies that indicate potential fraud or operational error. Automated systems instantly flag duplicate invoice payments, unapproved vendor creation, unusual journal entry timing, and unauthorized override of authority thresholds.

When an anomaly is detected, the automated auditing platform generates an instant risk alert, allowing internal audit teams to investigate root causes immediately. Early detection prevents minor operational errors from escalating into material weaknesses in financial reporting.

Streamlining External Audit Preparation
Continuous internal control monitoring delivers significant benefits during annual external financial audits. External audit firms can review continuous audit logs and automated control testing documentation, reducing the time required for manual field testing.

This integrated approach lowers overall audit compliance fees, reduces administrative burdens on corporate accounting staff, and provides senior management and audit committees with real-time visibility into the organization’s overall risk profile.

Core Implementation Guidelines
1. Transition to 100% Data Testing: Replace legacy sampling methods with automated continuous audit monitoring systems.
2. Deploy Anomaly Detection Algorithms: Implement machine learning models to identify unauthorized transactions and operational control overrides.
3. Align Internal and External Audit Workflows: Coordinate continuous control testing protocols with external auditors to optimize annual compliance cycles.

Continue Reading

Trending