Firms are seeking to make major technology investments this year, especially when it comes to automating tax return workflows, which was cited as a major priority by accounting leaders.
A recent survey from Wolters Kluwer found that tax return automation tools were the No. 1 solution firms planned to invest in this coming year, with 19% of respondents announcing their intention to do so. This aligns with other data in the survey, which found that 41% of firms cited “automatically populating tax returns, reporting and financial statements” as a benefit they expect from their technology purchases. It also speaks to the 27% of firms who named “increase automation to improve workflows and processes” as a strategy they intend to pursue in order to meet their goals for this year.
Automation tools, though, are not the only tax-related item firms are eyeing in 2025. The survey also found 15% are planning to buy tax compliance solutions, and another 15% are planning to buy tax law monitoring and research solutions.
Wolters Kluwer HQ
Firms are also eager to buy client portal solutions (17%), client data ingestion tools (16%), document scanning and extraction solutions (16%), AI search and/or productivity solutions (14%), client accounting solutions such as write-up and bookkeeping (14%), and data analytics/visualization tools (14%). The survey also found 18% are seeking beneficial ownership information reporting solutions for the Corporate Transparency Act, the status of which will be determined soon by the Supreme Court.
Not that they’ve necessarily been sleeping on tech upgrades this past year. The survey found that firms made extensive technology investments over the past year, especially compared to 2023. A full 44% of firms surveyed said they implemented a client accounting solution last year, compared to 25% the previous year. Similarly, 39% of firms invested in client portal solutions (up from 28% the previous year), 35% implemented AI search and productivity tools (up from 1%), 28% invested in document scanning and extraction solutions (up from 3%), 27% implemented bank reconciliation and validation solutions (up from 9%), 27% implemented financial report prep software last year (up from 11%), 25% implemented document management solutions (up from 17%), 19% implemented fixed asset solutions (up from 12%), 14% implemented audit methodology solutions (up from 4%), 14% invested in project management solutions (up from 6%) and 11% bought workpaper management and trial balance solutions (up from 10%).
Despite these investments, though, firms want more from their tech stacks. Chiefly, 48% of firms are looking for solutions that enable anytime, anywhere access; 41% want both automation as well as tools that facilitate requesting and collecting documents from clients; 37% want solutions that assist with data input and ingestion; 27% want software that reduces or eliminates manual repetitive tasks; 26% want support efficiencies by implementing advanced technologies such as RPA or AI; 25% are especially concerned with protecting sensitive information and data; and 24% want electronic delivery and payment of invoices.
Cloud and integration
The survey also found that years of investment in cloud infrastructure and software integrations are also paying dividends.
In terms of cloud computing, the survey found that 25% of firms have tech stacks that are fully in the cloud, and 42% of those not entirely in the cloud plan to move at least partially to the cloud in the next one to three years, while 19% of them plan to be fully cloud-based in that time frame. In contrast, only 17% of firms keep their tech stacks full on premise, and only 14% plan to remain that way.
These tech stacks are increasingly integrated as well. More than a quarter of respondents, 26%, said their tech stack was between three quarters fully integrated, and 31% said their tech stack was between half to three quarters integrated. Meanwhile, 34% had less than half their tech stack integrated (19% had zero to a quarter integrated).
The Wolters Kluwer survey found, in both cases, that cloud infrastructure and tech stack integration correlated with higher firm revenues. Cloud-based firms were more likely than traditional firms to report increased revenue (76% to 79%), increased profit (71% to 80%) and client engagements (67% to 76%). Meanwhile, among firms using fully integrated solutions, 55% reported revenue increases of 10% or more. On the flip side, of those firms that were less than 49% integrated, only about a quarter reported a similar revenue increase.
The survey did not assert a direct causal relationship between these things, so it might be that more profitable firms have more resources to invest in cloud infrastructure and tech stack integration, but regardless the survey still found a relationship.
Accountants as innovators
This prioritization of technology speaks to changes in how the accounting profession perceives itself, as the proportion of firms identifying as innovators is the highest it’s been in three years.
The Wolters Kluwer survey found that 44% of firms self-identify as either innovators or early adopters, the highest level in three years. In this survey, an innovator is defined as someone who actively seeks and adopts the newest available technology and works with software partners to develop and test it, while an early adopter is someone who adopts technology, once it’s proven, generally ahead of peers. Notably, the number of firms that identify specifically as innovators jumped by 14 points year over year, from 5% to 19%. Wolters Kluwer believes this speaks to a changing self-perception within the accounting profession as being increasingly tech-driven.
“There’s a noticeable shift in the industry as accountants and auditors increasingly embrace technology as a key driver of success,” said the report. “Whether enhancing client service and engagement or digitizing client document collection, software is proving to be a valuable ally.”
As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.
Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.
The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.
However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.
WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.
The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.
Untested Legal Mechanism
To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.
White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.
Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.
“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.
USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs
Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).
However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:
Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
Potash and critical minerals
Fish and seafood
Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)
Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.
Canadian Response and Market Reaction
Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.
Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.
Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.
With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.
The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.
The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.
Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.
However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.