Connect with us

Accounting

Tax Fraud Blotter: Class dismissed

Published

on

Family plot; past and present; fat chance; and other highlights of recent tax cases.

Princeton Junction, New Jersey: Former accounting professor Gordian A. Ndubizu has been sentenced to two years in prison for evading federal income taxes and filing false returns.

He was convicted in August of all eight counts of an indictment charging him with four counts of tax evasion and four counts of filing false returns in tax years 2014 through 2017. During those years, Ndubizu was a professor of accounting at a university in Pennsylvania as well as the co-owner of Healthcare Pharmacy in Trenton, New Jersey.

Healthcare Pharmacy was organized as an S corp, the income of which flowed through to Ndubizu and his wife and was to be reported on their personal income tax returns. Ndubizu prepared fraudulent books and records for Healthcare inflating the pharmacy’s costs of goods sold to reduce and underreport the pharmacy’s profits flowing through to Ndubizu and his wife.

Among other falsehoods, Ndubizu identified wire transfers as payments to purchase goods sold by the pharmacy when those transfers were in fact to personal bank accounts under Ndubizu’s control and to bank accounts in Nigeria associated with an automotive company under Ndubizu’s control.

Each of Ndubizu’s returns for 2014 through 2017 underreported his income and falsely reported that he had no financial interest in or signature authority over any foreign bank accounts.

He failed to report some $3.28 million in income from the pharmacy, resulting in the evasion of some $1.25 million in tax.

West Palm Beach, Florida: Lobbyist Eston Eurel Melton III has pleaded guilty to tax evasion.

Melton failed to pay some $1.2 million in taxes for tax years 2005 through 2014. By July 2019, his tax debt, including penalties and interest, was some $1.7 million.

He evaded IRS efforts to collect the taxes in multiple ways. To dissuade the agency from seizing his residence, for example, he represented that he was attempting to sell the residence but then undermined his realtor’s efforts to make the sale. 

Melton also signed some $67,000 in checks to himself from his lobbying business, Global Projects, and the checks were negotiated for cash. A family member then deposited the same or similar sums in cash into her account; that family member then opened a lobbying business, Gryphon Partners, apparently competing with Global Projects. Gryphon’s revenue rose while Global’s fell, and many of Global Projects’ clients transferred to Gryphon.

Global and Gryphon paid him almost nothing after 2019, instead making all distributions to his relative. The latter bought a new area home and lived there with Melton, telling the closing agent that Melton should not be on the deed because the family member was buying the home with her own money. In fact, approximately two-thirds of the cash to close was proceeds of Melton’s lobbying work. Melton also transferred four life insurance policies and the title of two cars to his family member.

Sentencing is May 16.

jail2-fotolia.jpg

Arlington, Georgia: Reginald Knight, who has a prior federal conviction for tax fraud in Florida, has been found guilty of another tax scheme.

He filed a federal return in March 2018 that falsely claimed $3,211,907 in wages, $2,586,551 in withholdings, $1,848,000 in Schedule C losses and a refund of $2,165,154. Knight fabricated W-2s and Schedule Cs for two business entities, but neither business generated the income, paid the withholdings or suffered the losses Knight claimed. 

The IRS did not issue a refund and began investigating Knight in 2021, discovering that he’d filed returns with similarly exorbitant financials for the non-operating business for tax years 2014, 2015 and 2016; the IRS did not issue a refund for tax years 2014 and 2015.

The IRS did issue a $745,953 refund to Knight for tax year 2016, which he used to pay for the construction of a new home, made transfers to his investment account, purchased a vehicle and paid for personal living expenses totaling $442,667.30. The IRS recovered $315,466.97.

Knight faces up to three years in prison, to be followed by three years of supervised release and a $100,000 fine. He has a federal tax conviction in the Southern District of Florida from 2005 and was sentenced to serve five months in prison per charge, to be served concurrently.

Las Vegas: Resident Candies Goode-McCoy has pleaded guilty to conspiring to defraud the United States by making claims for refunds of false COVID-19-related credits.

McCoy conspired to file returns seeking fraudulent refunds based on the Employee Retention Credit and paid sick and family leave credit. From around June 2022 through September 2023, she filed 1,227 false returns for her businesses and others claiming these credits.

In total, these claims sought refunds of more than $98 million, of which the IRS paid some $33 million. McCoy personally received more than $1.3 million in fraudulent refunds and was paid about $800,000 from those on whose behalf she’d filed fraudulent returns. She spent the money in part on luxury cars, gambling, vacations and luxury items.

Sentencing is Feb. 23. She faces a maximum of 10 years in prison, as well as a period of supervised release, restitution and monetary penalties. 

Upper Marlboro, Maryland: Charles Anthony Keemer, 64, has pleaded guilty to aiding and assisting the preparation and filing of a false and fraudulent return.

Keemer prepared 1040s for clients in exchange for fees even though he was not registered as a tax preparer with any federal, state or local regulator, had neither education nor work experience in tax prep, and didn’t report income from the tax prep work on his income tax returns.

During tax years 2013 through 2016, he prepared and submitted hundreds of federal income tax returns for clients, e-filing the returns through online software. Keemer met clients at various locations in Maryland to receive payment for the returns.

He added materially false items to the returns to inflate the federal refunds, including fictitious Schedule C businesses and false expenses.

The tax loss caused to the IRS was some $128,691.

He faces up to three years in prison.

Mansfield, Texas: Tax preparer Festus Adenisimi, 65, has been sentenced to 57 months in prison and ordered to pay more than $10 million restitution for the false preparation of returns.

Adenisimi owned FA Tax, where he and other preparers prepared fraudulent returns for clients, often causing the IRS to issue refunds. He admitted to falsely preparing his own returns as well, and admitted that he fraudulently obtained two Paycheck Protection Program loans totaling $760,415 under COVID-19 relief.

Adenisimi, who pleaded guilty in September, was also ordered to pay $10,283,737.65 in restitution.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Global ESG Reporting Standards and Double Materiality Compliance

Published

on

Corporate accounting departments face expanding reporting expectations as international sustainability disclosure standards achieve regulatory enforcement across major global jurisdictions. Chief Accounting Officers (CAOs) and corporate controllers are establishing rigorous internal accounting controls to treat Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) metrics with the same data precision, auditability, and governance as traditional financial statements.

Regulatory Harmonization Under Global Sustainability Frameworks
The implementation of standardized sustainability reporting frameworks—notably rules established by international sustainability accounting boards—has created unified expectations for public and large private enterprises. Corporations must report standardized metrics covering greenhouse gas emissions (Scope 1, 2, and material Scope 3), energy utilization, workforce demographics, and supply chain governance.

In Europe and other participating international jurisdictions, double materiality principles are mandatory. Under double materiality, organizations must report both how external sustainability risks impact corporate financial performance, and how internal corporate operations affect surrounding environmental and social structures.

Integrating Sustainability Metrics into Core ERP Systems
To provide auditable non-financial data, enterprise organizations are integrating specialized carbon accounting and ESG management platforms directly into core ERP systems. Automated data collectors capture energy utility invoices, logistics fuel consumption metrics, and vendor compliance records in real time.

Establishing automated, traceable data pipelines ensures that non-financial reporting is supported by clear audit trails. This structured approach allows external financial auditors to provide reasonable assurance on sustainability disclosures during annual corporate reporting cycles.

Financial Impacts and Capital Market Disclosure
Accurate ESG reporting directly influences corporate cost of capital and institutional credit ratings. Commercial lenders and institutional asset managers systematically incorporate sustainability metrics into risk pricing models. Companies that demonstrate transparent, verifiable progress in operational energy efficiency and climate risk mitigation benefit from expanded access to green bond markets and lower debt pricing.

Action Steps for Accounting Leadership
1. Implement Double Materiality Frameworks: Conduct comprehensive assessments to identify material financial and operational sustainability metrics.
2. Build Auditable Non-Financial Data Pipelines: Automate ESG data collection within core accounting software to ensure data integrity.
3. Align Sustainability with Annual Financial Filings: Prepare non-financial disclosures concurrently with financial statements to satisfy regulatory audit expectations.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Modernizing Internal Controls: Machine Learning and Continuous Monitoring in Auditing

Published

on

Internal audit departments and corporate risk managers are modernizing internal control frameworks by shifting from periodic sampling techniques to continuous monitoring and machine learning analytics. As operational data volumes increase across enterprise organizations, automated control testing ensures financial integrity, prevents corporate fraud, and streamlines annual audit engagements.

The Limitation of Periodic Audit Sampling
Historically, internal and external auditors evaluated internal controls by reviewing random samples of financial transactions—often analyzing less than five percent of total ledger entries. In complex enterprise environments, periodic sampling methods carry inherent risks of overlooking localized financial misstatements, unauthorized disbursements, or operational control breakdowns.

In 2026, progressive internal audit functions are utilizing automated continuous monitoring platforms that evaluate one hundred percent of financial transactions in real time. Continuous control auditing systems continuously monitor general ledger entries, procurement approvals, and expense reimbursements across all operating subsidiaries.

AI-Powered Fraud Detection and Anomaly Identification
Machine learning models trained on historical corporate financial data excel at identifying subtle transactional anomalies that indicate potential fraud or operational error. Automated systems instantly flag duplicate invoice payments, unapproved vendor creation, unusual journal entry timing, and unauthorized override of authority thresholds.

When an anomaly is detected, the automated auditing platform generates an instant risk alert, allowing internal audit teams to investigate root causes immediately. Early detection prevents minor operational errors from escalating into material weaknesses in financial reporting.

Streamlining External Audit Preparation
Continuous internal control monitoring delivers significant benefits during annual external financial audits. External audit firms can review continuous audit logs and automated control testing documentation, reducing the time required for manual field testing.

This integrated approach lowers overall audit compliance fees, reduces administrative burdens on corporate accounting staff, and provides senior management and audit committees with real-time visibility into the organization’s overall risk profile.

Core Implementation Guidelines
1. Transition to 100% Data Testing: Replace legacy sampling methods with automated continuous audit monitoring systems.
2. Deploy Anomaly Detection Algorithms: Implement machine learning models to identify unauthorized transactions and operational control overrides.
3. Align Internal and External Audit Workflows: Coordinate continuous control testing protocols with external auditors to optimize annual compliance cycles.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Tax Compliance and Global Regulatory Harmonization in 2026

Published

on

Corporate tax accounting departments are navigating an era of unprecedented regulatory complexity as global tax harmonization frameworks take full effect alongside real-time digital tax reporting mandates. Tax directors and accounting teams are adopting cloud-based tax compliance automation tools to manage multi-jurisdictional tax liabilities and satisfy stringent reporting rules across international jurisdictions.

Implementation of Global Minimum Tax Provisions
The implementation of international tax reform agreements—notably the Pillar Two global minimum tax framework—has reshaped multinational corporate tax planning. Multinational enterprises with consolidated revenues exceeding established thresholds must ensure an effective tax rate of at least 15% across every jurisdiction in which they operate.

Accounting teams are implementing specialized tax calculation modules integrated directly into enterprise resource planning (ERP) platforms. These automated tools calculate effective tax rates per country, identify top-up tax liabilities, and generate standardized compliance documentation required by national tax authorities.

Real-Time Digital Invoicing and E-Reporting Mandates
Tax authorities across Europe, Latin America, and Asia-Pacific have enacted mandatory electronic invoicing (e-invoicing) and continuous transaction controls (CTC). Under these systems, corporate transaction data must be submitted electronically to government portals in real time at the point of sale or invoice issuance.

This shift toward continuous digital tax reporting eliminates traditional annual tax audits in favor of ongoing automated compliance monitoring. Accounting departments are upgrading invoicing software to ensure seamless XML data formatting, digital signature authentication, and real-time validation against tax authority databases.

Automation and Data Analytics in Corporate Tax Strategy
To keep pace with dynamic tax legislation, tax departments are transitioning from reactive compliance teams to proactive strategic advisors. Machine learning algorithms analyze corporate transactional data to identify tax credits, research and development (R&D) incentives, and cross-border transfer pricing adjustments.

By automating routine tax return filings and calculations, corporate tax directors can focus on long-term capital structuring, evaluating the tax implications of corporate mergers, and optimizing international supply chain networks.

Strategic Priorities for Tax Executives
1. ERP System Upgrades: Ensure enterprise software is capable of generating real-time, granular tax data required for global minimum tax compliance.
2. E-Invoicing Integration: Implement scalable e-invoicing platforms to satisfy regional continuous transaction control regulations.
3. Strategic Tax Analytics: Utilize predictive tax modeling tools to evaluate structural changes in corporate operations and cross-border trade.

Continue Reading

Trending