Connect with us

Accounting

Tax Fraud Blotter: Hairy situations

Published

on

Find the subcontractor; thinkVandelay Industries’; seen the light; and other highlights of recent tax cases.

Orlando, Florida: Eduardo Anibal Escobar, Carlos Alberto Rodriguez and Adelmy Tejada, all of Orlando, were sentenced for conspiracy to commit wire fraud and conspiracy to commit tax fraud.

Escobar was sentenced to four years and nine months in prison, Rodriguez to 40 months and Tejada to 18 months in prison plus six months of home detention. Each pleaded guilty on April 3. The court ordered the defendants to pay $36,957,616 in restitution to the IRS for unpaid payroll taxes and a total of $397,895 in restitution to two insurance companies for workers’ comp claims they paid out.

Escobar and Rodriguez are legal permanent residents from El Salvador. Tejada is a naturalized U.S. citizen from El Salvador.

From around January 2015 through August 2024, the defendants conspired to facilitate the payment of construction workers off the books to avoid payroll taxes and workers’ comp premiums. The scheme also facilitated the employment of undocumented workers who were not legally authorized to work in the country.

The defendants, through their companies T. Escobar Construction and C. Escobar Construction, entered into agreements with hundreds of construction subcontractors to enable the latter to obtain contracts with contractors. For some 7% of the subcontractors’ payroll, the defendants caused certificates of insurance in the name of the defendants’ companies to be sent to construction contractors from which the subcontractors wished to obtain work, representing that the subcontractors worked for their companies and were covered by the companies’ workers’ comp.

In fact, the companies’ insurance policies were based on applications representing that the policies would cover a handful of employees and a minimal payroll. As a result of the defendants’ using their certificate of insurance to represent that the subcontractors worked for their companies, the insurers unwittingly covered hundreds of workers.

A total of $146,077,535 in payroll checks were deposited into the accounts of the defendants’ companies, from which they withdrew cash for the subcontractors’ workers, after subtracting their fee, without withholding, or paying over, payroll taxes to the IRS. The U.S. Treasury lost $36,957,616.

The defendants’ scheme allowed the construction contractors and subcontractors to disclaim responsibility for paying payroll taxes to the IRS, for ensuring that adequate workers’ compensation insurance was obtained and for verifying that the workers were legally authorized to work in the U.S.

Marietta, Georgia: Carl Delano Torjagbo, a.k.a. Karl Lucius Delano, has been convicted of bank fraud, wire fraud and money laundering after obtaining a fraudulent $9.6 million Paycheck Protection Program loan and filing fraudulent returns that generated a $3.4 million federal refund.

On Feb. 13, 2021, Torjagbo submitted two individual returns to the IRS. Each return was submitted using a different Social Security number and date of birth. The returns falsely alleged that Torjagbo had millions in losses that offset earnings from his purported African gold mining operations, Kremkov Industries. The false representations resulted in a U.S. Treasury check to Torjagbo for $3,366,240.76.

On Feb. 16, 2021, Torjagbo signed a PPP loan application requesting a $9,554,425 PPP loan for Kremkov Industries. He falsely certified that Kremkov Industries was in operation on Feb. 15, 2020, which was required for a company to be eligible for a loan; that he had 493 employees whose principal places of residence were in the U.S.; and that the company had an average monthly payroll of nearly $4 million. Torjagbo falsely certified that all loan proceeds would be used only for business-related purposes and submitted fraudulent documents to the bank, including false returns and fake payroll reports that listed nearly a dozen celebrities and fictional characters as purported employees of Kremkov Industries.

On March 29, 2021, Torjagbo received some $9.6 million in PPP money. He commingled it with the fraudulently obtained $3.4 million refund and paid personal debts and expenses, including on his home, luxury vehicles, a yacht, and real estate and equipment for a new business.

He faces a maximum of 170 years in prison, followed by five years of supervised release. Sentencing is Nov. 3.

Hands-in-jail-Blotter

Jacksonville, Florida: Survalarie Harris has pleaded guilty to aiding and assisting in the filing of a false return. 

Harris worked as a tax return preparer in Jacksonville. While preparing returns for others, she reported false information including false claims of having a business to decrease clients’ federal taxes and inflate refunds. IRS agents determined that Harris falsified returns in a similar manner multiple times by creating business expenses. Despite a lack of documentation from taxpayers, Harris included these fictitious expenses on the returns, indicating a net loss for a non-existent business, thus lowering taxpayers’ adjusted gross income and fascinating application for an Earned Income Tax Credit. 

In March 2022, Harris prepared a 2021 return for an undercover IRS agent who posed as a customer. Harris told the agent that she would owe money on her return and asked if the agent did any work on the side, to which the agent said she sometimes braided hair. Harris told the agent that she could help her receive a refund for an additional fee. Moments later, Harris told the undercover agent that she was receiving a refund of $2,950, minus the fee. However, Harris did not ask for, nor did the agent provide, documentation or information associated with business losses or income. 

Agents learned that Harris had been preparing falsified returns for taxpayers since at least 2018, estimating that she’d prepared more than 900 falsified returns between 2020 and 2022 tax year. Harris has agreed that the federal tax loss is at least $1,824,279.

Harris faces a maximum of three years. Sentencing is Dec. 10.

Estes Park, Colorado: Timothy McPhee has pleaded guilty to conspiring to defraud the United States and to tax evasion related to promotion and use of an illegal tax shelter. He also pleaded guilty to wire fraud related to his operation of a fraudulent investment scheme.

From 2018 through 2023, McPhee promoted a shelter to taxpayers across the country. The shelter was made up of a private family foundation and three trusts: a business trust, family trust, and charitable trust. McPhee taught clients who purchased the tax shelter how to use the trusts and foundation to evade paying federal income taxes on nearly all income.

Among other directions, McPhee instructed clients to assign nearly all their business income to the trusts and to falsify returns to make it seem as if that income belonged to the trusts, not the client. He told clients to spend the money in the trust bank accounts on their personal expenses and to fraudulently claim those expenses as deductions on the trust tax returns. As a result, clients who used the shelter paid taxes on only about 2% of their income. But because the clients funded the trusts, controlled the money and benefited from the trust funds, the income funneled to the trusts was taxable to the clients themselves.

McPhee acknowledged that he gave directions to clients that he knew directly contradicted IRS guidance and deliberately ignored warnings from accountants and attorneys that the shelter was illegal. In total, use of the tax shelter caused a loss to the U.S. of about $45 million in unpaid federal income taxes.

McPhee also personally used the shelter to conceal from the IRS more than $5 million in income he earned from 2016 through 2021. In so doing, McPhee did not pay some $1.8 million in federal income taxes he owed in those years.

From January 2023 through May 2024, McPhee also operated and promoted the “ROI Cash Flow Fund” as an opportunity for investors to earn a 3% monthly payout on a principal. He falsely told investors that the ROI Fund would generate monthly returns by sending the investors’ funds to a third-party borrower who would engage in foreign exchange currency trading. In total, based on McPhee’s false representations, investors sent more than $8 million to accounts he controlled and used investor funds to make monthly 3% payouts to investors. He also spent investor funds on his own expenses and investments.

Sentencing is Oct. 23. McPhee faces up to five years in prison for conspiring to defraud the U.S., a maximum of five years for tax evasion and up to 20 years for wire fraud. 

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Accounting

SEC’s Semiannual Reporting Proposal Faces Investor Pushback: What CFOs Need to Know

Published

on

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)

A proposal from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to potentially shift some public companies away from quarterly financial reporting toward a semiannual model is drawing significant pushback from investors, even as it continues moving through the regulatory process. The debate has direct implications for corporate finance teams, auditors, and the broader transparency of U.S. capital markets.

What the SEC Proposed

According to a summary published by accounting advisory firm Cohen & Co., the SEC issued a proposed rule on May 19, 2026, aimed at simplifying financial reporting requirements for many U.S. public companies. The proposal would potentially reduce the frequency of certain mandatory disclosures from quarterly to semiannual, a structural change that has not been made to core U.S. reporting requirements in decades.

The proposal follows an extended debate within U.S. policy circles, with proponents arguing that reduced reporting frequency could lower compliance costs and free up management time for longer-term strategic planning rather than quarter-to-quarter results management.

Why Investors Are Pushing Back

Comment letters submitted in response to the proposal have been extensive, and according to Cohen & Co.’s review of the public record, investors “appear to be largely opposed” to the shift, viewing frequent interim reporting as a core benefit of U.S. capital markets relative to other jurisdictions.

Accounting and law firms have taken a more measured position, generally urging any changes to remain aligned with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), whose existing disclosure requirements and guidance are built around a quarterly reporting cadence. A shift to semiannual reporting without corresponding changes to FASB guidance could create friction between SEC filing requirements and GAAP-based disclosure expectations.

Lessons From the U.K. Experience

The debate is not without precedent. The United Kingdom moved away from mandatory quarterly reporting for listed companies in 2014, returning to a semiannual disclosure requirement. According to Cohen & Co.’s analysis, that experience offers a cautionary data point: there was no measurable increase in capital expenditure or R&D investment following the change, while analyst coverage of affected companies declined as reliable interim information became less available — a particular risk for smaller and newly public companies that rely on analyst coverage to maintain investor visibility.

Practical Implications for Finance Teams

Beyond the debate over disclosure philosophy, the proposal carries practical complications. Many companies have debt covenants and credit agreements structured around quarterly financial delivery; a shift to semiannual reporting could require renegotiating those terms. Reduced reporting frequency would also extend the “window of market silence” between disclosures, a factor that governance and investor-relations teams would need to manage carefully to avoid information asymmetry.

Separately, and unrelated to the reporting-frequency debate, the SEC and FASB have continued finalizing more routine updates this year. New Accounting Standards Updates are taking effect for December 31, 2026, fiscal year-ends covering income tax disclosures, credit loss measurement, induced debt conversions, and stock compensation, according to Eide Bailly’s review of 2026 ASU activity. Additional guidance on paid-in-kind dividends and environmental credits is also on the near-term horizon.

What to Watch Next

The semiannual reporting proposal remains in the comment and review phase, and no final rule has been adopted as of this writing. Finance leaders should monitor the SEC’s regulatory agenda for further movement, while treating the current quarterly reporting requirement as the operative standard until any final rule is issued and an effective date is set.

Given the extent of investor opposition documented in the comment file, a full shift to mandatory semiannual reporting appears more likely to result in either a scaled-back compromise or continued study rather than swift adoption — though the SEC’s ultimate direction remains uncertain.

 

Continue Reading

Accounting

AI-Driven Automation and Continuous Accounting Frameworks

Published

on

The accounting profession is undergoing a fundamental structural transition as enterprise finance departments shift from periodic month-end closes toward automated continuous accounting models. By integrating specialized machine learning algorithms directly into enterprise resource planning (ERP) platforms, chief accounting officers are transforming financial reporting from a retrospective exercise into a real-time operational asset.

The Shift from Periodic Close to Continuous Financial Reporting
Traditional accounting workflows heavily relied on manual data reconciliation, spreadsheet calculations, and multi-week closing cycles at the end of each fiscal period. In contrast, continuous accounting frameworks utilize automated software agents to process, validate, and post transactional data in real time as business activities occur.

Automated bank reconciliation tools cross-reference incoming bank feeds, invoice records, and purchase orders automatically. By resolving transactional variances instantly throughout the month, corporate accounting teams eliminate the traditional workload spikes associated with quarterly and annual closes.

Machine Learning in Audit Trails and Anomaly Detection
Advanced natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning tools are redefining internal audit and financial control environments. Automated systems analyze 100% of general ledger entries, identifying anomalous transactions, duplicate payments, and unauthorized journal entries in real time.

Rather than relying on random statistical sampling, corporate internal auditors can focus their attention on high-risk flags automatically surfaced by algorithmic monitoring platforms. This continuous risk assessment strengthens internal controls over financial reporting (ICFR) and significantly reduces fraud risk.

Evolving Roles for Accounting Professionals
As routine data entry and manual reconciliation tasks become fully automated, the skill set required for accounting professionals is shifting toward data analysis, system design, and strategic business advisory.
– Systems Governance: Accountants are increasingly responsible for monitoring algorithmic accuracy and managing data integration pipelines.
– Business Partnership: Finance professionals leverage real-time financial dashboards to advise operational leaders on margin management and working capital allocation.
– Regulatory Compliance Management: Accounting teams utilize automated platforms to ensure compliance with dynamic tax codes and international accounting standards.

Core Implementation Recommendations
1. Deploy Automated Reconciliation Tools: Integrate continuous transaction processing modules into existing enterprise ERP architectures.
2. Establish Algorithmic Governance Controls: Implement strict internal testing protocols to ensure automated accounting rules comply with GAAP/IFRS standards.
3. Reskill Accounting Teams: Invest in training finance staff on data analytics, workflow automation, and predictive financial modeling.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Global ESG Reporting Standards and Double Materiality Compliance

Published

on

Corporate accounting departments face expanding reporting expectations as international sustainability disclosure standards achieve regulatory enforcement across major global jurisdictions. Chief Accounting Officers (CAOs) and corporate controllers are establishing rigorous internal accounting controls to treat Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) metrics with the same data precision, auditability, and governance as traditional financial statements.

Regulatory Harmonization Under Global Sustainability Frameworks
The implementation of standardized sustainability reporting frameworks—notably rules established by international sustainability accounting boards—has created unified expectations for public and large private enterprises. Corporations must report standardized metrics covering greenhouse gas emissions (Scope 1, 2, and material Scope 3), energy utilization, workforce demographics, and supply chain governance.

In Europe and other participating international jurisdictions, double materiality principles are mandatory. Under double materiality, organizations must report both how external sustainability risks impact corporate financial performance, and how internal corporate operations affect surrounding environmental and social structures.

Integrating Sustainability Metrics into Core ERP Systems
To provide auditable non-financial data, enterprise organizations are integrating specialized carbon accounting and ESG management platforms directly into core ERP systems. Automated data collectors capture energy utility invoices, logistics fuel consumption metrics, and vendor compliance records in real time.

Establishing automated, traceable data pipelines ensures that non-financial reporting is supported by clear audit trails. This structured approach allows external financial auditors to provide reasonable assurance on sustainability disclosures during annual corporate reporting cycles.

Financial Impacts and Capital Market Disclosure
Accurate ESG reporting directly influences corporate cost of capital and institutional credit ratings. Commercial lenders and institutional asset managers systematically incorporate sustainability metrics into risk pricing models. Companies that demonstrate transparent, verifiable progress in operational energy efficiency and climate risk mitigation benefit from expanded access to green bond markets and lower debt pricing.

Action Steps for Accounting Leadership
1. Implement Double Materiality Frameworks: Conduct comprehensive assessments to identify material financial and operational sustainability metrics.
2. Build Auditable Non-Financial Data Pipelines: Automate ESG data collection within core accounting software to ensure data integrity.
3. Align Sustainability with Annual Financial Filings: Prepare non-financial disclosures concurrently with financial statements to satisfy regulatory audit expectations.

Continue Reading

Trending