Connect with us

Accounting

Tax Fraud Blotter: Just set the pool anywhere

Published

on

By any other name; a different kind of clearing house; dodgy digital; and other highlights of recent tax cases.

New York: David Motovich has been sentenced in federal court in Brooklyn to 15 years in prison for operating an illegal money transmitting business, failure to file currency transaction reports, bank fraud, conspiracy to commit bank fraud, money laundering, aggravated ID theft and conspiracy to defraud the U.S.

Motovich, convicted by jury in July 2024, used his family-run business in Brooklyn as a front for an illegal, unlicensed check-cashing operation. He offered his services primarily to owners and operators of construction companies, cashing millions of dollars in checks to fund off-the-books payrolls for those businesses. He cashed checks for his customers in exchange for a fee or a percentage of the face amount of the checks, typically 4% to 15%. Motovich’s customers paid a higher fee with the understanding that Motovich would not file Suspicious Activity Reports or Currency Transaction Reports for cash transactions in amounts greater than $10,000. Motovich supplied his customers with fraudulent documents to disguise the transactions.

He also created shell companies to facilitate his illegal business and allow himself and his associates to evade taxes. Motovich instructed his customers to issue checks drawn against their business accounts and to make the checks payable to one of the companies, then deposited the checks into bank accounts that he created at several financial institutions, which he’d opened in the names of others. In one instance, he stole the ID of a low-level worker and then bribed a banker to open accounts in the victim’s name and funnel millions of dollars through the accounts.

In total, between 2012 and 2019 Motovich deposited more than $55 million into these accounts and used the money to buy real estate; pay personal and corporate credit card accounts; purchase such luxury items as millions of dollars of diamonds, watches, jewelry and clothing; make lease and purchase payments for Porsche and Lexus vehicles; pay premiums on multimillion-dollar life insurance policies for himself, his wife and others; renovate his penthouse apartment in Manhattan to include a swimming pool; and to fund other business ventures.

Motovich was also to forfeit some $38 million, including his interests in a Manhattan penthouse apartment featuring a private indoor swimming pool, commercial real estate buildings in Brooklyn, and luxury jewelry and handbags. Co-defendants Marina Kuyan, Kemal Sarkinovic and Joshua Markovics previously pleaded guilty and await sentencing.

Pensacola, Florida: Tax preparer Khristine N. Harper has pleaded guilty to 20 counts of aiding and assisting the preparation of false returns and one count of ID theft.

Between 2018 and 2024, Harper routinely prepared and filed fraudulent income tax returns for her clients by listing false amounts for various deductions, credits, and other items that were never provided to her by those clients. After Harper became aware in July 2023 that the IRS was investigating her, she changed the name of her prep business from Kings Tax Service to Echelon Tax.

She also obtained a PTIN in another person’s name without permission and filed her clients’ 2023 returns using that fraudulently obtained PTIN. For just the twenty specific returns listed in the indictment that were the basis of the counts to which Harper pled guilty, she caused more than $103,000 in federal tax loss.

Sentencing is Dec 17.

Hands-in-jail-Blotter

Savannah, Missouri: Tax preparer and school official Anthony S. Moon, 44, has been sentenced for theft concerning programs receiving federal funds, wire fraud, and embezzlement from an employee benefit plan.

Moon worked as the district accountant for the Savannah R-III School District and was also owner and president of Parker and Associates, a tax prep and bookkeeping company.

Beginning about January 2023 and continuing through about November 2023, Moon embezzled from the district. He used his position to write unauthorized checks to himself and his business from the district checking account; he also used the district’s checking account to make Automated Clearing House payments to his and his wife’s personal credit card accounts.

Moon also devised a scheme as president of his accounting business to embezzle funds from his employees’ retirement savings plan. For his employees, Moon sponsored an employee pension plan subject to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, the Simple IRA Plan. For nearly two years, he caused tens of thousands of dollars to be withheld from salaries of his employees but failed to transfer those funds to the plan. Moon failed to deposit funds in employer matching contributions to the plan.

He used those embezzled funds to pay for his and his wife’s personal expenses, including, among other things, Kansas City Chiefs tickets, food, travel, gas and entertainment.

He was sentenced to a total of a year and a day in prison and ordered to pay $92,746.99 in restitution to the District and $29,695.77 to his two employee-victims. The court also entered a final order of money judgment forfeiture of $122,442.76.

Sewell, New Jersey: Businessman Jose Camilo Perez, Jr., 54, has been sentenced to a year in prison for evading more than $3.4 million in taxes.

Perez controlled a company that digitized medical records for hospitals and other healthcare entities. From 2016 through 2023, the business received more than $8 million for the services it performed. Perez attempted to evade assessment of federal income taxes by cashing checks payable to the business at a check cashing business rather than depositing those checks into the business’s bank account or his personal bank account, and then he used the cash for personal expenses and to pay payroll.

During those years, Perez reported none of the income he received from the business to the IRS.

Perez was also sentenced to three years of supervised release and ordered to pay $3,434,066 in restitution.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Global ESG Reporting Standards and Double Materiality Compliance

Published

on

Corporate accounting departments face expanding reporting expectations as international sustainability disclosure standards achieve regulatory enforcement across major global jurisdictions. Chief Accounting Officers (CAOs) and corporate controllers are establishing rigorous internal accounting controls to treat Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) metrics with the same data precision, auditability, and governance as traditional financial statements.

Regulatory Harmonization Under Global Sustainability Frameworks
The implementation of standardized sustainability reporting frameworks—notably rules established by international sustainability accounting boards—has created unified expectations for public and large private enterprises. Corporations must report standardized metrics covering greenhouse gas emissions (Scope 1, 2, and material Scope 3), energy utilization, workforce demographics, and supply chain governance.

In Europe and other participating international jurisdictions, double materiality principles are mandatory. Under double materiality, organizations must report both how external sustainability risks impact corporate financial performance, and how internal corporate operations affect surrounding environmental and social structures.

Integrating Sustainability Metrics into Core ERP Systems
To provide auditable non-financial data, enterprise organizations are integrating specialized carbon accounting and ESG management platforms directly into core ERP systems. Automated data collectors capture energy utility invoices, logistics fuel consumption metrics, and vendor compliance records in real time.

Establishing automated, traceable data pipelines ensures that non-financial reporting is supported by clear audit trails. This structured approach allows external financial auditors to provide reasonable assurance on sustainability disclosures during annual corporate reporting cycles.

Financial Impacts and Capital Market Disclosure
Accurate ESG reporting directly influences corporate cost of capital and institutional credit ratings. Commercial lenders and institutional asset managers systematically incorporate sustainability metrics into risk pricing models. Companies that demonstrate transparent, verifiable progress in operational energy efficiency and climate risk mitigation benefit from expanded access to green bond markets and lower debt pricing.

Action Steps for Accounting Leadership
1. Implement Double Materiality Frameworks: Conduct comprehensive assessments to identify material financial and operational sustainability metrics.
2. Build Auditable Non-Financial Data Pipelines: Automate ESG data collection within core accounting software to ensure data integrity.
3. Align Sustainability with Annual Financial Filings: Prepare non-financial disclosures concurrently with financial statements to satisfy regulatory audit expectations.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Modernizing Internal Controls: Machine Learning and Continuous Monitoring in Auditing

Published

on

Internal audit departments and corporate risk managers are modernizing internal control frameworks by shifting from periodic sampling techniques to continuous monitoring and machine learning analytics. As operational data volumes increase across enterprise organizations, automated control testing ensures financial integrity, prevents corporate fraud, and streamlines annual audit engagements.

The Limitation of Periodic Audit Sampling
Historically, internal and external auditors evaluated internal controls by reviewing random samples of financial transactions—often analyzing less than five percent of total ledger entries. In complex enterprise environments, periodic sampling methods carry inherent risks of overlooking localized financial misstatements, unauthorized disbursements, or operational control breakdowns.

In 2026, progressive internal audit functions are utilizing automated continuous monitoring platforms that evaluate one hundred percent of financial transactions in real time. Continuous control auditing systems continuously monitor general ledger entries, procurement approvals, and expense reimbursements across all operating subsidiaries.

AI-Powered Fraud Detection and Anomaly Identification
Machine learning models trained on historical corporate financial data excel at identifying subtle transactional anomalies that indicate potential fraud or operational error. Automated systems instantly flag duplicate invoice payments, unapproved vendor creation, unusual journal entry timing, and unauthorized override of authority thresholds.

When an anomaly is detected, the automated auditing platform generates an instant risk alert, allowing internal audit teams to investigate root causes immediately. Early detection prevents minor operational errors from escalating into material weaknesses in financial reporting.

Streamlining External Audit Preparation
Continuous internal control monitoring delivers significant benefits during annual external financial audits. External audit firms can review continuous audit logs and automated control testing documentation, reducing the time required for manual field testing.

This integrated approach lowers overall audit compliance fees, reduces administrative burdens on corporate accounting staff, and provides senior management and audit committees with real-time visibility into the organization’s overall risk profile.

Core Implementation Guidelines
1. Transition to 100% Data Testing: Replace legacy sampling methods with automated continuous audit monitoring systems.
2. Deploy Anomaly Detection Algorithms: Implement machine learning models to identify unauthorized transactions and operational control overrides.
3. Align Internal and External Audit Workflows: Coordinate continuous control testing protocols with external auditors to optimize annual compliance cycles.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Tax Compliance and Global Regulatory Harmonization in 2026

Published

on

Corporate tax accounting departments are navigating an era of unprecedented regulatory complexity as global tax harmonization frameworks take full effect alongside real-time digital tax reporting mandates. Tax directors and accounting teams are adopting cloud-based tax compliance automation tools to manage multi-jurisdictional tax liabilities and satisfy stringent reporting rules across international jurisdictions.

Implementation of Global Minimum Tax Provisions
The implementation of international tax reform agreements—notably the Pillar Two global minimum tax framework—has reshaped multinational corporate tax planning. Multinational enterprises with consolidated revenues exceeding established thresholds must ensure an effective tax rate of at least 15% across every jurisdiction in which they operate.

Accounting teams are implementing specialized tax calculation modules integrated directly into enterprise resource planning (ERP) platforms. These automated tools calculate effective tax rates per country, identify top-up tax liabilities, and generate standardized compliance documentation required by national tax authorities.

Real-Time Digital Invoicing and E-Reporting Mandates
Tax authorities across Europe, Latin America, and Asia-Pacific have enacted mandatory electronic invoicing (e-invoicing) and continuous transaction controls (CTC). Under these systems, corporate transaction data must be submitted electronically to government portals in real time at the point of sale or invoice issuance.

This shift toward continuous digital tax reporting eliminates traditional annual tax audits in favor of ongoing automated compliance monitoring. Accounting departments are upgrading invoicing software to ensure seamless XML data formatting, digital signature authentication, and real-time validation against tax authority databases.

Automation and Data Analytics in Corporate Tax Strategy
To keep pace with dynamic tax legislation, tax departments are transitioning from reactive compliance teams to proactive strategic advisors. Machine learning algorithms analyze corporate transactional data to identify tax credits, research and development (R&D) incentives, and cross-border transfer pricing adjustments.

By automating routine tax return filings and calculations, corporate tax directors can focus on long-term capital structuring, evaluating the tax implications of corporate mergers, and optimizing international supply chain networks.

Strategic Priorities for Tax Executives
1. ERP System Upgrades: Ensure enterprise software is capable of generating real-time, granular tax data required for global minimum tax compliance.
2. E-Invoicing Integration: Implement scalable e-invoicing platforms to satisfy regional continuous transaction control regulations.
3. Strategic Tax Analytics: Utilize predictive tax modeling tools to evaluate structural changes in corporate operations and cross-border trade.

Continue Reading

Trending