Connect with us

Accounting

Tax Fraud Blotter: Needing relief

Published

1 year ago

on

Nothing but the tooth; an offer she can’t refuse; patterns of filing; and other highlights of recent tax cases.

Fort Collins, Colorado: Dr. Ryan Ulibarri, a dentist, has pleaded guilty to six counts of tax evasion related to his use of an illegal tax shelter.

Since 2014 Ulibarri owned and operated Ulibarri Family Dentistry. In 2016, he purchased an abusive-trust tax shelter for $50,000. The shelter concealed income and created phony deductions through a so-called business trust, family trust, charitable trust and a private family foundation, all of which Ulibarri created and controlled. From 2017 through 2022, he used this shelter to conceal from the IRS more than $3.5 million in income from his dental practice.

As the purported trustee, Ulibarri signed trust instruments purporting to create the three trusts and the foundation, and opened bank accounts in the name of each. He recruited friends to falsely sign his trust instruments as the purported creators. Ulibarri transferred majority ownership of his practice to the business trust despite having been warned by attorneys and CPAs that in Colorado a trust could not own a dental practice.

He then transferred more than $3 million from his practice to create the illusion that the funds belonged to those entities. Ulibarri retained complete control over the funds and used them to pay for personal expenses including his home mortgage, credit card bills, boats and professional baseball season tickets.

He filed false returns for himself, his dental practice and the trusts and foundation that falsely reported the income he earned from his practice as income of the trusts. Ulibarri also claimed fraudulent deductions for his personal living expenses, which he disguised as trust expenses and charitable donations.

Ulibarri is alleged to have caused a total tax loss to the IRS exceeding $1 million.

Sentencing is June 17. He faces up to five years in prison for each count of tax evasion, as well as a period of supervised release, restitution and monetary penalties. 

Kingsport, Tennessee: Resident Aylissa Glidewell has pleaded guilty to conspiring to commit wire and mail fraud after making claims for refunds of false pandemic tax credits.

She conspired to file false returns seeking fraudulent refunds based on the Employee Retention Credit and paid sick and family leave credit by creating phony businesses. She filed numerous false returns for those businesses and directed the refunds to addresses that she and conspirators controlled.

In total, the refunds claimed exceeded $3.4 million, of which the IRS paid some $1.8 million.

Sentencing is July 9. She faces a maximum of 20 years in prison.

Irvine, California: Iris Ramaya Au, former girlfriend of cryptocurrency fraudster Adam Iza, who dubbed himself “The Godfather,” has agreed to plead guilty to a federal tax charge for failing to report more than $2.6 million she’d obtained via her then-boyfriend’s criminal activity.

From 2020 to 2024, Iza obtained millions of dollars of unreported income from a series of crimes, including fraudulently obtaining access to advertising accounts and lines of credit provided by Facebook and Meta Platforms and selling access to those accounts. He also engaged active Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department deputies to provide private security for him and caused the deputies, among other things, to obtain court-authorized search warrants and confidential law enforcement information targeting people with whom he had financial and personal disputes.

On Jan. 30, Iza pleaded guilty; his sentencing is June 16, when he will face up to 35 years in prison. He has been in federal custody since September.

Au created shell corporations and opened bank accounts in the names of those entities. She then used the illicit funds in those accounts to pay some $1 million to the deputies, mostly in cash, purchase or lease luxury real estate, cars, jewelry and clothing, pay for recreational activity for Iza and herself valued at nearly $10 million and to acquire some $16 million in cryptocurrency for Iza.

Au admitted that she transferred more than $2.6 million from these accounts to her personal bank accounts from 2020 through 2023, income that she failed to report to the IRS on her federal returns.

After pleading guilty, Au will face up to three years in prison.

jail2-fotolia.jpg

Orlando, Florida: Marielys Feliciano Rodriguez has been sentenced to a year of house arrest and ordered to pay $3,338,558 in restitution to the IRS for wire and tax fraud. 

Rodriguez established a shell company that purported to be involved in the construction industry. She obtained a workers’ compensation insurance policy in the name of the company to cover a minimal payroll for a few purported employees, then “rented” the insurance to work crews who had obtained subcontracts with construction contractors on projects in Florida counties, as well as to contractors in other states. Rodriguez sent the contractors a certificate as “proof” that the work crews had workers’ comp. The scheme also facilitated avoidance of the higher cost of adequate workers’ comp for the workers on the crews to whom Rodriguez rented insurance.

The contractors issued payroll checks for the workers’ wages to the shell companies and Rodriguez cashed these checks and then distributed the cash to the work crews after deducting their fee, which was typically about 6% of the payroll. Rodriguez cashed payroll checks totaling some $13 million.

Neither the shell company nor the contractors reported to government authorities the wages that were paid to the workers, nor did they pay either the employees’ or the employer’s portion of payroll taxes, totaling more than $3 million.

She was ordered to serve five years of supervised release as well, and the court also entered a money judgment for $347,760, the proceeds of the wire fraud.

Baton Rouge, Louisiana: Tax preparer Whylithia R. Robinson has been held in contempt for violating a permanent injunction that prohibited her and her business, AAA Tax Service LLC, from preparing, filing or assisting in the preparation or filing of federal returns for others.

The U.S. filed a complaint against Robinson and AAA in January 2023. According to the complaint, Robinson prepared and filed 2,629 federal income tax returns for clients through AAA from 2019 to 2021 and displayed a pattern of filing returns during this period that understated clients’ tax liabilities and overstated refunds by fabricating business losses, claiming false charitable donations or claiming undeserved education credits. On April 23, 2023, the court issued a default judgment of permanent injunction that barred Robinson and AAA from preparing returns for others.

The court recently found that she continued to prepare 227 returns for others. For these violations, the court held her in civil contempt and ordered that she disgorge $68,100 in fees she’d earned in violation of the injunction, as well as reimburse the U.S. its costs of litigation and travel.

Hurricane, West Virginia: Businessman Dean E. Dawson, 65, has pleaded guilty to one count of willful failure to pay over employment taxes.

He operated RPC Group, a real estate appraisal business. Dawson, responsible for withholding employment taxes from employees and paying over those funds to the IRS, failed to pay the money over between 2015 and 2022. He also used the RPC business accounts to pay personal expenses, including credit cards and his wife’s home mortgage, and issued checks to his wife from RPC even though she was not an employee.

From 2018 to 2023, Dawson also failed to file personal returns or pay income tax.

In total, he caused a tax loss to the IRS exceeding $250,000.

Sentencing is June 23. He faces up to five years in prison, up to three years of supervised release and a $250,000 fine, as well as restitution to be determined later.

Related Topics:
Continue Reading

Accounting

AI-Driven Automation and Continuous Accounting Frameworks

Published

1 week ago

on

August 15, 2026

By

The accounting profession is undergoing a fundamental structural transition as enterprise finance departments shift from periodic month-end closes toward automated continuous accounting models. By integrating specialized machine learning algorithms directly into enterprise resource planning (ERP) platforms, chief accounting officers are transforming financial reporting from a retrospective exercise into a real-time operational asset.

The Shift from Periodic Close to Continuous Financial Reporting
Traditional accounting workflows heavily relied on manual data reconciliation, spreadsheet calculations, and multi-week closing cycles at the end of each fiscal period. In contrast, continuous accounting frameworks utilize automated software agents to process, validate, and post transactional data in real time as business activities occur.

Automated bank reconciliation tools cross-reference incoming bank feeds, invoice records, and purchase orders automatically. By resolving transactional variances instantly throughout the month, corporate accounting teams eliminate the traditional workload spikes associated with quarterly and annual closes.

Machine Learning in Audit Trails and Anomaly Detection
Advanced natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning tools are redefining internal audit and financial control environments. Automated systems analyze 100% of general ledger entries, identifying anomalous transactions, duplicate payments, and unauthorized journal entries in real time.

Rather than relying on random statistical sampling, corporate internal auditors can focus their attention on high-risk flags automatically surfaced by algorithmic monitoring platforms. This continuous risk assessment strengthens internal controls over financial reporting (ICFR) and significantly reduces fraud risk.

Evolving Roles for Accounting Professionals
As routine data entry and manual reconciliation tasks become fully automated, the skill set required for accounting professionals is shifting toward data analysis, system design, and strategic business advisory.
– Systems Governance: Accountants are increasingly responsible for monitoring algorithmic accuracy and managing data integration pipelines.
– Business Partnership: Finance professionals leverage real-time financial dashboards to advise operational leaders on margin management and working capital allocation.
– Regulatory Compliance Management: Accounting teams utilize automated platforms to ensure compliance with dynamic tax codes and international accounting standards.

Core Implementation Recommendations
1. Deploy Automated Reconciliation Tools: Integrate continuous transaction processing modules into existing enterprise ERP architectures.
2. Establish Algorithmic Governance Controls: Implement strict internal testing protocols to ensure automated accounting rules comply with GAAP/IFRS standards.
3. Reskill Accounting Teams: Invest in training finance staff on data analytics, workflow automation, and predictive financial modeling.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Global ESG Reporting Standards and Double Materiality Compliance

Published

2 weeks ago

on

August 9, 2026

By

Corporate accounting departments face expanding reporting expectations as international sustainability disclosure standards achieve regulatory enforcement across major global jurisdictions. Chief Accounting Officers (CAOs) and corporate controllers are establishing rigorous internal accounting controls to treat Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) metrics with the same data precision, auditability, and governance as traditional financial statements.

Regulatory Harmonization Under Global Sustainability Frameworks
The implementation of standardized sustainability reporting frameworks—notably rules established by international sustainability accounting boards—has created unified expectations for public and large private enterprises. Corporations must report standardized metrics covering greenhouse gas emissions (Scope 1, 2, and material Scope 3), energy utilization, workforce demographics, and supply chain governance.

In Europe and other participating international jurisdictions, double materiality principles are mandatory. Under double materiality, organizations must report both how external sustainability risks impact corporate financial performance, and how internal corporate operations affect surrounding environmental and social structures.

Integrating Sustainability Metrics into Core ERP Systems
To provide auditable non-financial data, enterprise organizations are integrating specialized carbon accounting and ESG management platforms directly into core ERP systems. Automated data collectors capture energy utility invoices, logistics fuel consumption metrics, and vendor compliance records in real time.

Establishing automated, traceable data pipelines ensures that non-financial reporting is supported by clear audit trails. This structured approach allows external financial auditors to provide reasonable assurance on sustainability disclosures during annual corporate reporting cycles.

Financial Impacts and Capital Market Disclosure
Accurate ESG reporting directly influences corporate cost of capital and institutional credit ratings. Commercial lenders and institutional asset managers systematically incorporate sustainability metrics into risk pricing models. Companies that demonstrate transparent, verifiable progress in operational energy efficiency and climate risk mitigation benefit from expanded access to green bond markets and lower debt pricing.

Action Steps for Accounting Leadership
1. Implement Double Materiality Frameworks: Conduct comprehensive assessments to identify material financial and operational sustainability metrics.
2. Build Auditable Non-Financial Data Pipelines: Automate ESG data collection within core accounting software to ensure data integrity.
3. Align Sustainability with Annual Financial Filings: Prepare non-financial disclosures concurrently with financial statements to satisfy regulatory audit expectations.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Modernizing Internal Controls: Machine Learning and Continuous Monitoring in Auditing

Published

3 weeks ago

on

August 5, 2026

By

Internal audit departments and corporate risk managers are modernizing internal control frameworks by shifting from periodic sampling techniques to continuous monitoring and machine learning analytics. As operational data volumes increase across enterprise organizations, automated control testing ensures financial integrity, prevents corporate fraud, and streamlines annual audit engagements.

The Limitation of Periodic Audit Sampling
Historically, internal and external auditors evaluated internal controls by reviewing random samples of financial transactions—often analyzing less than five percent of total ledger entries. In complex enterprise environments, periodic sampling methods carry inherent risks of overlooking localized financial misstatements, unauthorized disbursements, or operational control breakdowns.

In 2026, progressive internal audit functions are utilizing automated continuous monitoring platforms that evaluate one hundred percent of financial transactions in real time. Continuous control auditing systems continuously monitor general ledger entries, procurement approvals, and expense reimbursements across all operating subsidiaries.

AI-Powered Fraud Detection and Anomaly Identification
Machine learning models trained on historical corporate financial data excel at identifying subtle transactional anomalies that indicate potential fraud or operational error. Automated systems instantly flag duplicate invoice payments, unapproved vendor creation, unusual journal entry timing, and unauthorized override of authority thresholds.

When an anomaly is detected, the automated auditing platform generates an instant risk alert, allowing internal audit teams to investigate root causes immediately. Early detection prevents minor operational errors from escalating into material weaknesses in financial reporting.

Streamlining External Audit Preparation
Continuous internal control monitoring delivers significant benefits during annual external financial audits. External audit firms can review continuous audit logs and automated control testing documentation, reducing the time required for manual field testing.

This integrated approach lowers overall audit compliance fees, reduces administrative burdens on corporate accounting staff, and provides senior management and audit committees with real-time visibility into the organization’s overall risk profile.

Core Implementation Guidelines
1. Transition to 100% Data Testing: Replace legacy sampling methods with automated continuous audit monitoring systems.
2. Deploy Anomaly Detection Algorithms: Implement machine learning models to identify unauthorized transactions and operational control overrides.
3. Align Internal and External Audit Workflows: Coordinate continuous control testing protocols with external auditors to optimize annual compliance cycles.

Continue Reading

Trending