Connect with us

Accounting

Tax Fraud Blotter: No class

Published

on

Pushing 100 notices; nothing but the tooth; checking out; and other highlights of recent tax cases.

Le Roy, Minnesota: Tax preparer Craig Jacobson, 67, has been sentenced to two years of probation after pleading guilty to two felony counts of failure to collect and remit taxes, according to published reports. 

Jacobson was reportedly charged after the Minnesota Department of Revenue revealed that he failed to file multiple withholding returns, filed false withholding and federal returns, and failed to pay withholding taxes for four years.

In late 2020, the state began investigating Jacobson after learning about criminal tax violations occurring from 2015 to 2018, according to published reports. During that time, reports said, Jacobson was CEO of two companies — M&I Tax Accounting and C&C Tax Service Inc., both of which were registered with the state for corporation tax, sales and use tax, and withholding tax accounts.

From 2015 to 2016, M&I reportedly withheld taxes from employees’ wages but never turned those taxes in. The state of Minnesota sent more than 60 notices to M&I, reports added. From 2017 to 2018, C&C withheld taxes from its employees’ wages, but again, the state reportedly said no withheld taxes were paid despite tax authorities sending another 30 notices.

During the same period, Jacobson reportedly had substantial gambling winnings and losses but his returns showed no federal taxes reflecting this. A tax specialist for the state compared Jacobson’s individual returns that he filed for Minnesota with those he filed with the IRS. The two didn’t match, reports said.

News outlets added that before the plea deal Jacobson was charged with 10 felony counts of failing to file withholding tax returns, 10 felony counts of failing to pay withholding tax, four felony counts of filing false or fraudulent individual income tax returns and one felony count of filing a false withholding return.

Ft. Worth, Texas: A U.S. District Court has permanently barred tax preparer Ruben Gonzalez and anyone acting with him or at his direction from preparing federal returns for others. Gonzalez consented to the injunction.

Gonzalez is banned from using his business, “Sin Barreras Income Tax,” to prepare returns for others. The government’s complaint alleged that Gonzalez or those working for him significantly overstated clients’ refunds in a substantial number of returns prepared at the business from 2021 to 2023 by fabricating or inflating business losses, by fabricating charitable donation deductions and by falsely claiming energy credits and COVID family sick leave credits. The complaint alleges Gonzalez cost the U.S. more than $20 million in lost tax revenue from 2021 to 2023.

The injunction requires Gonzalez to notify each person for whom he or preparers at Sin Barreras prepared federal returns, amended returns or refund claims from 2021 to the present. Gonzalez must also post a copy of the injunction where he conducts business and post a statement on social media accounts and websites that he is barred from preparing returns.

Princeton Junction, New Jersey: Professor and pharmacy co-owner Gordian A. Ndubizu, 69, has been convicted of evading federal income taxes and filing false returns.

During tax years 2014 through 2017, he was a professor of accounting at a university in Pennsylvania as well as the co-owner of Healthcare Pharmacy in Trenton, New Jersey. Healthcare Pharmacy was organized as an S corporation, the income of which flowed through to Ndubizu and his wife and was to be reported on their personal income tax returns.

He prepared fraudulent books and records for Healthcare Pharmacy, inflating costs of goods sold to reduce and underreport the pharmacy’s profits flowing through to him and his wife. Among other falsehoods, Ndubizu identified certain wire transfers as payments to purchase goods sold by the pharmacy when these wire transfers were made to personal bank accounts under his control and to bank accounts in Nigeria associated with an automotive company under his control. 

Ndubizu’s returns for tax years 2014 through 2017 underreported his income and falsely reported that he had no financial interest in or signature authority over any foreign bank accounts. He failed to report some $3.28 million in income from the pharmacy, resulting in the evasion of some $1.25 million in tax.

Each count of tax evasion carries a penalty of up to five years in prison and a fine of $250,000. Each count of filing a false tax return carries a maximum of three years in prison and a fine of $250,000.

Hands-in-jail-Blotter

Hastings, Minnesota: Tax preparer Tania Fay Pryor, 37, has been sentenced to six months in jail for felony tax evasion, according to published reports.

Pryor, who reportedly once owned five H&R Block franchises and a daycare center, must also pay restitution and serve five years of probation.

Pryor was initially charged with 18 tax-related counts between 2006 and 2008 and owed more than $43,000 in unpaid taxes, reports said, adding that she pleaded guilty last May to four counts of failing to file returns or report her income and to two more charges of failing to pay taxes.

She reportedly failed to file returns or pay taxes, including for her former employees, though she deducted the money from their paychecks. According to cited state records, Pryor did not file withholding returns and tax deposits for her tax-preparing business for 2007 and 2008. A criminal complaint filed in a local county district court said Pryor owed more than $7,500 in withholding tax for 2006 for that business, according to reports.

Newark, New Jersey: Business owner Alain Rodrigues, 49, has admitted evading taxes through a check-cashing scheme.

Rodrigues owned and operated a construction company in Newark and Old Bridge, New Jersey, and beginning around 2017 deposited a portion of the payments from his customers into a business bank account; he then converted the balance to cash and money orders that he deposited in a personal bank account or used to pay cash wages to employees.

Rodrigues only reported the portion of the company’s revenue that was deposited in the business bank account on his business taxes and did not report the business revenue deposited directly into his personal bank account as income on his personal income taxes. The company, under his direction, also did not report to the IRS the cash wages it paid to employees nor collect or pay over employment taxes on these wages.

Rodrigues and his company paid $554,873 less than they owed in income taxes and failed to collect and pay over $793,139 in employment taxes, a total of some $1.35 million.

Sentencing is Dec. 19. Each count of tax evasion and failure to collect and pay over taxes carries a maximum of five years in prison and a $250,000 fine. As part of his plea agreement, Rodrigues has agreed to pay the government $1.35 million in restitution and to file amended returns. 

Pickerington, Ohio: Office manager Eric Moesle has pleaded guilty to failing to pay more than $750,000 in employment taxes and to failure to file returns. 

From 2014 through 2020, Moesle was the office manager for Elemental Dental in Pataskala, Ohio, where he oversaw payroll, bookkeeping and tax return prep. At Moesle’s direction, Elemental withheld Social Security, Medicare and income taxes from employees’ wages but did not pay over those taxes to the IRS nor file employment returns. During that time, the business also failed to pay over the employer’s share of those taxes.

Interviewed by the IRS in 2022, Moesle lied that he didn’t know that the employment taxes hadn’t been paid and that Elemental’s employment tax returns and W-2s hadn’t been filed; he also falsely stated these failures or omissions were unintentional. 

Moesle caused a federal tax loss of $760,255.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Accounting firms seeing increased profits

Published

on

Accounting firms are reporting bigger profits and more clients, according to a new report.

The report, released Monday by Xero, found that nearly three-quarters (73%) of firms reported increased profits over the past year and 56% added new clients thanks to operational efficiency and expanded service offerings.

Some 85% of firms now offer client advisory services, a big spike from 41% in 2023, indicating a strategic shift toward delivering forward-looking financial guidance that clients increasingly expect.

AI adoption is also reshaping the profession, with 80% of firms confident it will positively affect their practice. Currently, the most common use cases for AI include: delivering faster and more responsive client services (33%), enhancing accuracy by reducing bookkeeping and accounting errors (33%), and streamlining workflows through the automation of routine tasks (32%).

“The widespread adoption of AI has been a turning point for the accounting profession, giving accountants an opportunity to scale their impact and take on a more strategic advisory role,” said Ben Richmond, managing director, North America, at Xero, in a statement. “The real value lies not just in working more efficiently, but working smarter, freeing up time to elevate the human element of the profession and in turn, strengthen client relationships.”

Some of the main challenges faced by firms include economic uncertainty (38%), mastering AI (36%) and rising client expectations for strategic advice (35%). 

While 85% of firms have embraced cloud platforms, a sizable number still lag behind, missing out on benefits such as easier data access from anywhere (40%) and enhanced security (36%).

Continue Reading

Accounting

Private equity is investing in accounting: What does that mean for the future of the business?

Published

on

Private equity firms have bought five of the top 26 accounting firms in the past three years as they mount a concerted strategy to reshape the industry. 

The trend should not come as a surprise. It’s one we’ve seen play out in several industries from health care to insurance, where a combination of low-risk, recurring revenue, scalability and an aging population of owners create a target-rich environment. For small to midsized accounting firms, the trend is exacerbated by a technological revolution that’s truly transforming the way accounting work is done, and a growing talent crisis that is threatening tried-and-true business models.

How will this type of consolidation affect the accounting business, and what do firms and their clients need to be on the lookout for as the marketplace evolves?

Assessing the opportunity… and the risk

First and foremost, accounting firm owners need to be aware of just how desirable they are right now. While there has been some buzz in the industry about the growing presence of private equity firms, most of the activity to date has focused on larger, privately held firms. In fact, when we recently asked tax professionals about their exposure to private equity funding in our 2025 State of Tax Professionals Report, we found that just 5% of firms have actually inked a deal and only 11% said they are planning to look, or are currently looking, for a deal with a private equity firm. Another 8% said they are open to discussion. On the one hand, that’s almost a quarter of firms feeling open to private equity investments in some way. But the lion’s share of respondents —  87% — said they were not interested.

Recent private equity deal volume suggests that the holdouts might change their minds when they have a real offer on the table. According to S&P Global, private equity and venture capital-backed deal value in the accounting, auditing and taxation services sector reached more than $6.3 billion in 2024, the highest level since 2015, and the trend shows no signs of slowing. Firm owners would be wise to start watching this trend to see how it might affect their businesses — whether they are interested in selling or not.

Focus on tech and efficiencies of scale

The reason this trend is so important to everyone in the industry right now is that the private equity firms entering this space are not trying to become accountants. They are looking for profitable exits. And they will do that by seizing on a critical inflection point in the industry that’s making it possible to scale accounting firms more rapidly than ever before by leveraging technology to deliver a much wider range of services at a much lower cost. So, whether your firm is interested in partnering with private equity or dead set on going it alone, the hyperscaling that’s happening throughout the industry will affect you one way or another.

Private equity thrives in fragmented businesses where the ability to roll up companies with complementary skill sets and specialized services creates an outsized growth opportunity. Andrew Dodson, managing partner at Parthenon Capital, recently commented after his firm took a stake in the tax and advisory firm Cherry Bekaert, “We think that for firms to thrive, they need to make investments in people and technology, and, obviously, regulatory adherence, to really differentiate themselves in the market. And that’s going to require scale and capital to do it. That’s what gets us excited.”

Over time, this could reshape the industry’s market dynamics by creating the accounting firm equivalent of the Traveling Wilburys — supergroups capable of delivering a wide range of specialized services that smaller, more narrowly focused firms could never previously deliver. It could also put downward pressure on pricing as these larger, platform-style firms start finding economies of scale to deliver services more cost-effectively.

The technology factor

The great equalizer in all of this is technology. Consistently, when I speak to tax professionals actively working in the market today, their top priorities are increased efficiency, growth and talent. Firms recognize they need to streamline workflows and processes through more effective use of technology, and they are investing heavily in AI, automation and data analytics capabilities to do that. Private equity firms, of course, are also investing in tech as they assemble their tax and accounting dream teams, in many cases raising the bar for the industry.

The question is: Can independent firms leverage technology fast enough to keep up with their deep-pocketed competition?

Many firms believe they can, with some even going so far as to publicly declare their independence.  Regardless of the path small to midsized firms take to get there, technology-enabled growth is going to play a key role in the future of the industry. Market dynamics that have been unfolding for the last decade have been accelerated with the introduction of serious investors, and everyone in the industry — large and small — is going to need to up their games to stay competitive.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Trump tax bill would help the richest, hurt the poorest, CBO says

Published

on

The House-passed version of President Donald Trump’s massive tax and spending bill would deliver a financial blow to the poorest Americans but be a boon for higher-income households, according to a new analysis from the Congressional Budget Office.

The bottom 10% of households would lose an average of about $1,600 in resources per year, amounting to a 3.9% cut in their income, according to the analysis released Thursday. Those decreases are largely attributable to cuts in the Medicaid health insurance program and food aid through the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.

Households in the highest 10% of incomes would see an average $12,000 boost in resources, amounting to a 2.3% increase in their incomes. Those increases are mainly attributable to reductions in taxes owed, according to the report from the nonpartisan CBO.

Households in the middle of the income distribution would see an increase in resources of $500 to $1,000, or between 0.5% and 0.8% of their income. 

The projections are based on the version of the tax legislation that House Republicans passed last month, which includes much of Trump’s economic agenda. The bill would extend tax cuts passed under Trump in 2017 otherwise due to expire at the end of the year and create several new tax breaks. It also imposes new changes to the Medicaid and SNAP programs in an effort to cut spending.

Overall, the legislation would add $2.4 trillion to US deficits over the next 10 years, not accounting for dynamic effects, the CBO previously forecast.

The Senate is considering changes to the legislation including efforts by some Republican senators to scale back cuts to Medicaid.

The projected loss of safety-net resources for low-income families come against the backdrop of higher tariffs, which economists have warned would also disproportionately impact lower-income families. While recent inflation data has shown limited impact from the import duties so far, low-income families tend to spend a larger portion of their income on necessities, such as food, so price increases hit them harder.

The House-passed bill requires that able-bodied individuals without dependents document at least 80 hours of “community engagement” a month, including working a job or participating in an educational program to qualify for Medicaid. It also includes increased costs for health care for enrollees, among other provisions.

More older adults also would have to prove they are working to continue to receive SNAP benefits, also known as food stamps. The legislation helps pay for tax cuts by raising the age for which able bodied adults must work to receive benefits to 64, up from 54. Under the current law, some parents with dependent children under age 18 are exempt from work requirements, but the bill lowers the age for the exemption for dependent children to 7 years old. 

The legislation also shifts a portion of the cost for federal food aid onto state governments.

CBO previously estimated that the expanded work requirements on SNAP would reduce participation in the program by roughly 3.2 million people, and more could lose or face a reduction in benefits due to other changes to the program. A separate analysis from the organization found that 7.8 million people would lose health insurance because of the changes to Medicaid.

Continue Reading

Trending