Connect with us

Accounting

Tax Fraud Blotter: No solution

Published

on

Making use of refunds; playing defense; how to use thin air; and other highlights of recent tax cases.

Honolulu: Resident Hannah Heart has pleaded guilty to defrauding her mortgage lender and conspiring to defraud the IRS by fraudulently obtaining a tax refund and then thwarting IRS efforts to recoup it.

She conspired to file a false 2014 individual income tax return in her name. Heart’s co-conspirators created a fake tax form purportedly issued by a mortgage lender to Heart, which she attached to her return. The form falsely reported that Heart had received income from a financial institution of more than $2.4 million, from which over $1.2 million in taxes had been withheld. Heart then filed a return that claimed she was entitled to a $464,904 refund, which the IRS paid.

When the agency began trying to collect the fraudulent refund, she took several steps to thwart collection. She deposited the refund check into a trust bank account and immediately transferred most of the balance to a separate bank account, both of which she controlled. She also sent numerous “false, fraudulent and frivolous” letters to the IRS in response to their communications.

Heart helped another co-conspirator defraud the IRS using the same scheme. She and her co-conspirator deposited a second fraudulently obtained $1 million refund check from the IRS, payable to the co-conspirator.

In total, Heart caused a tax loss to the IRS of $1,618,985.54.

Heart also conspired to defraud her mortgage lender of $2,066,522.22.

She faces up to 20 years in prison on the charge of mail fraud and a maximum of five years for conspiracy to defraud the IRS. She also faces a period of supervised release, restitution and monetary penalties.

Washington, D.C.: Douglas Edelman, 73, a former defense contractor, has pleaded guilty to tax crimes related to a scheme to defraud the U.S. and evade taxes on income he earned from his contracts with the Defense Department.

Edelman pleaded guilty to 10 felony counts: conspiracy to defraud the United States, seven counts of tax evasion and two counts of making a false statement. Trial on the remaining counts will be in 2026.

Edelman founded and owned half of Mina Corp. and Red Star Enterprises, a defense contracting business that received more than $7 billion from contracts with the U.S. Department of Defense for jet fuel for U.S. post-9/11 military efforts in Afghanistan and the Middle East. 

Edelman engaged in a lengthy scheme to hide his Mina/Red Star profits to evade U.S. taxes, including by concealing his income in undisclosed foreign bank accounts, creating false documents and making false statements that one of his co-conspirators, a French citizen residing abroad and without U.S. tax obligations, founded and owned Mina/Red Star. 

In 2010, the U.S. House began investigating allegations of corruption in connection with Mina/Red Star’s contracts with the Department of Defense. As part of this inquiry, the subcommittee became interested in the identity of Mina/Red Star’s owners.

At this time, Edelman had not filed U.S. returns to report the millions he’d earned and had not paid U.S. taxes on his income. Edelman caused his attorneys to tell Congress a false story that a French co-conspirator founded and co-owed Mina/Red Star with another individual. To corroborate the false story, Edelman and a co-conspirator created false and backdated paperwork. 

To continue the scheme, Edelman lied about Mina/Red Star’s ownership to other arms of the U.S. government, including to the Department of Defense during contract negotiations in 2010 and 2011, to the IRS in a 2016 application to the Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program and to the Justice Department in a 2018.

In conjunction with his 2016 application to the IRS program, Edelman filed false returns for several prior years that only reported income from gifts or purported consulting payments, continuing to conceal the millions he had earned from his company. He also concealed profits he had earned from a separate business to provide internet service to members of the armed forces in Afghanistan. 

Instead of paying the taxes he owed, Edelman used the money to fund his lifestyle and additional investments. He invested in a music television franchise in Eastern Europe, a land venture in Mexico and a farm in Kenya, and purchased property around Europe, including a home in Spain and a townhouse in London.

He faces up to five years in prison for each of the 10 counts to which he pleaded. He also faces a period of supervised release, restitution and monetary penalties. 

jail2-fotolia.jpg

Bowling Green, Kentucky: Resident Kenneth Ray Moore has been sentenced to 46 months in prison, to be followed by two years of supervised release, for wire fraud, money laundering and tax evasion.

Between October 2009 and May 2020, he committed wire fraud by engaging in a scheme to embezzle $1,145,800 from his employer. Moore, who formerly held the position of vice president of finance, caused his employer to issue checks to “KBM Solutions,” a shell company he created to receive embezzled funds. Moore laundered money by transferring the embezzled funds to his personal accounts.

Moore also failed to file personal income tax returns between 2013 and 2020, and owed more than $300,000 in unpaid taxes, penalties and interest.

He was ordered to pay $1,158,194.80 in restitution for the embezzlement and $342,155.84 in restitution for tax evasion.

Boston: Former IRS employee Kathleen Mannion, of Lawrence, Massachusetts, has pleaded guilty to filing false returns to fraudulently obtain refunds and to stealing Social Security benefits.

From 1998 to 2009, Mannion worked as an IRS contact representative in Andover, Massachusetts. Between approximately July 2020 through April 2023, she prepared and filed income tax returns for other individuals with the IRS. Even though Mannion prepared these returns for others, she did not list herself as the preparer but instead prepared the returns to appear as if the taxpayers had done the returns on their own.

Mannion listed ineligible dependents on the returns, resulting in higher refunds for which the taxpayers did not qualify, all without the knowledge of the taxpayers. Mannion also filed forms with the IRS directing that a portion of the fraudulently obtained refunds be deposited in her personal accounts.

Between April and October 2020, Mannion applied for Social Security benefits via telephone for others. She directed the Social Security Administration to deposit the benefits in her personal accounts, which she also used for her personal benefit.

Aiding and assisting the preparation and filing of a false return provides for up to  three years in prison, a year of supervised release and a fine of up to $250,000. The charge of theft of government money provides for a sentence of up to 10 years in prison, three years of supervised release and a fine of $250,000. Sentencing is Sept. 3.

St. Louis: Tax preparer Shasherese M. Reed, 53, has been sentenced to five years of probation and ordered to pay $230,000 in restitution for preparing fraudulent returns.

Reed, who previously pleaded guilty, prepared at least 41 false tax returns for 13 different taxpayers, costing the IRS at least $312,192. Authorities said Reed “made up businesses out of thin air” to claim tens of thousands of dollars in false business expenses, false medical and dental expenses, mortgage interest, state and local taxes, and deductible employee expenses. 

She falsely identified her daughter as the paid preparer on the returns and filed the returns under her daughter’s tax prep business, Majac Money. The IRS had revoked the PTIN of Reed and her business, Sha-Sha Taxes, in 2015 after the IRS determined Reed had submitted false tax returns.

During the recent investigation, Reed prepared a fraudulent return for an undercover IRS agent. Without ever asking if the agent had a business, Reed prepared a return that included a false Schedule C showing $26,242 in business expenses.

Reed made about $378,026 in fees for the 2017 to 2021 tax years.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending