Connect with us

Accounting

Tax Fraud Blotter: Place your bets

Published

on

Close personal relationships; home is where the scam is; tort trouble; and other highlights of recent tax cases.

Los Angeles: Mathew R. Bowyer, of San Juan Capistrano, California, has agreed to plead guilty to running an illegal gambling business that took in unlawful sports bets, including from professional athletes as well as a former Major League Baseball Japanese-language interpreter who now faces prison time.

Bowyer operated an unlicensed and illegal bookmaking business that focused on sports betting and violated a California law that prohibits bookmaking. Bowyer’s gambling business remained in operation for at least five years until October 2023 and at times had more than 700 bettors.

He operated this business out of various locations in Los Angeles and Orange Counties as well as in Las Vegas. Bowyer also employed agents and sub-agents — including casino hosts — who worked for his illegal gambling business who were paid a portion of the losses that bettors incurred.

One of Bowyer’s clients was Ippei Mizuhara, who pleaded guilty on June 4 to one count of bank fraud and one count of subscribing to a false return. Mizuhara was the Japanese-language interpreter and de facto manager of baseball superstar Shohei Ohtani. Mizuhara admitted to stealing nearly $17 million from Ohtani to pay off gambling debts and to failing to pay tax on his gambling income.

Authorities consider Ohtani a victim; Mizuhara’s sentencing is Oct. 25.

From September 2021 to January 2024, Mizuhara placed at least 19,000 bets with Bowyer’s gambling business. During this time, Mizuhara had total winning bets of at least $142,256,769, and total losing bets of at least $182,935,206, leaving Mizuhara owing approximately $40,678,436.

Bowyer admitted in his plea agreement to knowingly and willfully falsely reporting his taxable income to the IRS on his 2022 return: Bowyer reported $607,897 in total income but his unreported income for that year was $4,030,938 — income from his illegal gambling business. Bowyer owes additional taxes of $1,613,280 for 2022, not including interest and penalties.

Bowyer has agreed to plead guilty to operating an unlawful gambling business, money laundering and subscribing to a false return. He faces up to 10 years in prison on the money laundering count, up to five years for the unlawful gambling business and up to three years for the false return. 

Madison, Wisconsin: David Swartz, of Highland Park, Illinois, has been sentenced to two years in prison for wire fraud and assisting in the preparation of a false return. 

Swartz worked as an unregistered investment advisor and fund manager and had a close personal relationship with his first victim, a resident of Madison. Beginning in January 2009, the victim made regular and periodic investments in Swartz’s investment fund with the understanding that Swartz was conservatively investing. 

Beginning in 2018, Swartz began misrepresenting the performance of the fund. When the fund lost significant value in February 2020 due to risky trades, Swartz lied to the victim about the fund’s performance and induced them to invest an additional $150,000. Swartz also produced a doctored Charles Schwab account statement for the fund and a phony K-1 for 2019.

Relying on the falsified document, on Oct. 12, 2020, the victim filed a 1040 for 2019 that substantially overreported capital gains, causing the victim to report owing an unjustified amount of federal income tax.

Swartz, who pleaded guilty in April, was also ordered to pay $181,915 in restitution to the victim.

jail2-fotolia.jpg

Bristol, Vermont: Jodi Lathrop has been sentenced to 15 months in prison following her guilty plea to charges of wire fraud and federal tax evasion.

In 2023, a federal grand jury returned an indictment charging Lathrop with 11 counts of mail and wire fraud, four of personal tax evasion and four of aiding the preparation of false corporate returns. Lathrop pled guilty to one count of wire fraud and one of tax evasion.

Between 2014 and 2020, she embezzled from Claire Lathrop Band Mill, a logging and wood chipping business, while serving as the company’s office manager and bookkeeper. She used company credit cards to make personal purchases and used company money to pay off personal credit cards and other personal expenses. Lathrop falsely recorded unauthorized checks in company books and caused the company to file returns that falsely deducted Lathrop’s personal expenses as legitimate business expenses.

She was also ordered to pay some $479,000 in restitution and a $15,000 fine and two years of supervised release after her prison term.

Rockwood, Pennsylvania: Resident Jason R. Svonavec has been sentenced to a year and one day in prison, to be followed by one year of supervised release, and ordered to pay a fine of $40,000 and restitution of $207,378 (which has already been paid) to the IRS on his conviction of tax evasion and filing false income tax returns.

Svonavec evaded taxes in 2017 by illegally expensing the construction of his home in Somerset, Pennsylvania, through entities he operates called Heritage Coal and Natural Resources LLC and Banshee Crane. In 2018, he filed a tax return reporting false tax deductions for Heritage Coal.

Scranton, Pennsylvania: Robert J. Powell, of Palm Beach, Florida, has pleaded guilty to tax evasion in connection with substantial legal fees he earned while associated with a local law firm.

Powell sought to dodge a substantial federal tax bill for 2016 by using nominee bank accounts, causing an accountant to file a request for a filing extension that falsely reported zero estimated tax liability for 2016 and making false statements during an IRS audit in 2019.

Powell’s license to practice law was suspended in 2009 and he was disbarred in 2015. In 2009 he relinquished his ownership of the Powell Law Group but retained the right to collect 90% of the remainder of any future fees collected by the firm after firm expenses.

The Powell Group represented thousands of plaintiffs in a mass tort litigation in 2015 for which Powell was expected to receive some $120 million in attorneys’ fees. Prior to the attorneys’ fees disbursement, the Powell Group and its co-counsel used those future legal fees as collateral to obtain a series of loans totaling more than $125 million.

Instead of depositing the loan money into the firm’s bank accounts and paying firm expenses, Powell directed the loans to nominee bank accounts under his control then used the money for personal debts and expenses, as well as his and his former law partner’s personal benefit. In June 2016, most of the attorneys’ fees were finally disbursed and the loans repaid. 

Still, Powell did not file a personal income tax return and pay taxes on the receipt of the fees in that year. After the initial disbursement and through October 2019, an additional $12 million in attorneys’ fees was distributed and the Powell Law Group’s share continued to be directed into nominee bank accounts that Powell controlled. Powell personally received an additional $3.6 million of the fees. For 2010 through 2022, Powell did not file income tax returns despite receiving and spending other personal income.

In 2019, when the IRS commenced an audit, he lied to revenue agents to conceal his income and expenditures for 2014 through 2016, claiming that his only source of funds were loan advances, that he and his spouse did not have signature authority or control over other bank accounts and that he had no ownership in any corporations.

Powell agreed to pay full restitution to the IRS.

Morgantown, West Virginia: Dr. David M. Anderson has admitted to filing a false return.

He filed false tax returns that understated his taxable income, causing a loss to the IRS of $143,599.

Anderson faces up to three years in prison. 

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending