Connect with us

Accounting

Tax Fraud Blotter: Royal pains

Published

on

Gone commercial; PTIN-free; seen the light; and other highlights of recent tax cases.

Seattle: Real estate owner Steven T. Loo, 69, has been convicted on six counts of tax evasion and six counts of making false returns.

Loo had an ownership interest in and operated commercial real estate properties in Washington and California. He hired companies to manage the properties and had the companies send profits from the properties to bank accounts he controlled. Loo spent this money for his benefit and that of his family and friends and re-invested in various businesses that he controlled.

He did not declare that income — more than $4.7 million — on his returns, using shell companies and repeated transfers of funds to conceal the income.

Each count of tax evasion is punishable by up to five years in prison. Making and subscribing to a false return is punishable by up to three years. Sentencing is Oct. 9.

Mobile, Alabama: Tax preparer Carrie Mae Jones has been sentenced to two years in prison for filing fraudulent returns.

Jones operated Agee’s Outreach Tax Service and Royalty Queen Tax Service, where she acted as a ghost preparer of at least 34 false or fraudulent returns between 2019 and 2022. 

She was also ordered to pay $419,452 in restitution and serve a year of supervised release.

Jacksonville, Florida: Ana Romero, of Honduras, has been sentenced to 21 months in prison for conspiracy to commit wire fraud and conspiracy to defraud the U.S. to impede the IRS. The court also ordered Romero to forfeit $461,850, proceeds of the wire fraud offense.

Between 2018 and 2019, she conspired to facilitate payment of construction workers off the books to avoid premiums for workers’ comp and payroll taxes. Construction contractors and subcontractors entered arrangements with the conspirators through which Universal Florida Construction — a shell company formed by Romero — facilitated both distribution of proof of insurance and payment of workers with cash.

In exchange for 6% to 8% of the contractors’ and subcontractors’ payroll, Romero and others caused the distribution of certificates of liability insurance in the name of Universal, which contractors and subcontractors then used as nominal proof that workers were supposedly insured. The insurance company was defrauded of more than $1.2 million.

Romero and others also facilitated the deposit of checks into the shell company’s bank accounts, as well as the withdrawal of cash to be paid to workers — all without withholding or paying over payroll taxes to the IRS. Through these arrangements with the conspirators, the construction contractors and subcontractors could disclaim responsibility for withholding and paying payroll taxes to the IRS or ensuring that the workers were legally authorized to work in the U.S. 

The conspirators caused the U.S. Treasury to lose more than $1.9 million. One co-conspirator, Oscar Molina-Avila, was previously sentenced to 52 months in prison for his role in the scheme. Co-defendant Jose Molina-Herrera was previously sentenced to 27 months.

Romero, who pleaded guilty last year, was also ordered to pay $1,947,471.18 in restitution to the IRS.

St. Louis: Tax preparer Elisa Y. Brown, 60, has been sentenced to five years of probation for falsifying federal income tax returns for clients.

Brown admitted preparing false returns from 2016 to 2020. She prepared returns from her home for $150 to $250 per return but did not have a PTIN; she digitally signed each return in the name of the taxpayer, making it appear to the IRS that the taxpayer had prepared the return. She admitted filing false returns for 11 clients from 2016 to 2020.

During the same time, she prepared and submitted a total of 560 returns, many of which contained similar false deductible expenses.

Brown, who previously pleaded guilty to two counts of assisting in the preparation of a false return, was also ordered to pay $156,559.98 in restitution.

Hands-in-jail-Blotter

Greeneville, Tennessee: Ryan Glidewell has pleaded guilty to conspiring to commit wire and mail fraud, aiding and assisting in the preparation of a false return, and money laundering for his role in a scheme to claim refunds based on false claims for the Employee Retention Credit and paid Sick and Family Leave Credit.

Glidewell and his conspirators created phony businesses that lacked employees or operations to falsely claim the credits. Glidewell filed numerous false returns for those businesses and directed the refunds to be mailed to addresses he and conspirators controlled.

In total, the returns claimed more than $3.4 million in refunds, of which the IRS paid $1.8 million.

Sentencing is Nov. 12. He faces a maximum of 20 years in prison for conspiring to commit mail and wire fraud, up to 10 years for money laundering and a maximum of three years for aiding and assisting in the filing of a false return.

Indianapolis: CPA Jason L. Crace has been sentenced to three years in prison for assisting in the preparation of false returns for clients who participated in an illegal tax shelter.

Between 2013 and 2022, Crace prepared income tax returns for clients that claimed millions of dollars in false deductions for “royalty payments.”

As Crace knew, these payments were merely circular flows of money to give the appearance of genuine business expenses. Typically, a client would send money to bank accounts controlled by scheme promoters who then sent the money — minus a fee — back to a different bank account controlled by the client. Shelter participants retained control of the money they transferred while falsely deducting the transfers as business expenses.

One of the scheme’s promoters, Stephen T. Mellinger III, previously pleaded guilty and was sentenced to eight years in prison for his role in the scheme.

Crace’s preparation of false returns claiming fraudulent deductions caused a loss to the IRS of more than $2.5 million.

Crace, who previously pleaded guilty, was also ordered to serve a year of supervised release and pay $2,532,936 in restitution.

Baton Rouge, Louisiana: Benjamin Thomas III, of Hammond, Louisiana, has been convicted of five counts of failing to truthfully account for and pay over federal trust fund taxes. 

Thomas owned, operated and controlled Lighthouse Community Care, a mental health services clinic. As the business expanded, Thomas opened several locations in Louisiana and hired more than 100 employees.

Throughout the company’s existence, Thomas would withhold trust fund taxes from employees’ paychecks, but he often failed to timely file Lighthouse’s quarterly employment returns and consistently failed to pay over to the IRS the withheld funds. For the five specific time periods charged, the first three quarters of 2017 and the first two quarters of 2018, Thomas failed to truthfully account for and pay over more than $970,000 in trust funds.

The IRS frequently communicated with him through written notices, phone calls and an in-person interview to remind him of his tax obligations and encourage him to pay. Meanwhile, he diverted more than $350,000 in company funds to a vacation home in the Dominican Republic, more than $400,000 to a separate management company that he controlled and more than $500,000 to a family trust that he created. Thomas also spent hundreds of thousands of dollars on luxury automobiles, private school tuition, high-end clothing, jewelry and accessories.

Thomas had been living in the Dominican Republic since early 2023.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Global ESG Reporting Standards and Double Materiality Compliance

Published

on

Corporate accounting departments face expanding reporting expectations as international sustainability disclosure standards achieve regulatory enforcement across major global jurisdictions. Chief Accounting Officers (CAOs) and corporate controllers are establishing rigorous internal accounting controls to treat Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) metrics with the same data precision, auditability, and governance as traditional financial statements.

Regulatory Harmonization Under Global Sustainability Frameworks
The implementation of standardized sustainability reporting frameworks—notably rules established by international sustainability accounting boards—has created unified expectations for public and large private enterprises. Corporations must report standardized metrics covering greenhouse gas emissions (Scope 1, 2, and material Scope 3), energy utilization, workforce demographics, and supply chain governance.

In Europe and other participating international jurisdictions, double materiality principles are mandatory. Under double materiality, organizations must report both how external sustainability risks impact corporate financial performance, and how internal corporate operations affect surrounding environmental and social structures.

Integrating Sustainability Metrics into Core ERP Systems
To provide auditable non-financial data, enterprise organizations are integrating specialized carbon accounting and ESG management platforms directly into core ERP systems. Automated data collectors capture energy utility invoices, logistics fuel consumption metrics, and vendor compliance records in real time.

Establishing automated, traceable data pipelines ensures that non-financial reporting is supported by clear audit trails. This structured approach allows external financial auditors to provide reasonable assurance on sustainability disclosures during annual corporate reporting cycles.

Financial Impacts and Capital Market Disclosure
Accurate ESG reporting directly influences corporate cost of capital and institutional credit ratings. Commercial lenders and institutional asset managers systematically incorporate sustainability metrics into risk pricing models. Companies that demonstrate transparent, verifiable progress in operational energy efficiency and climate risk mitigation benefit from expanded access to green bond markets and lower debt pricing.

Action Steps for Accounting Leadership
1. Implement Double Materiality Frameworks: Conduct comprehensive assessments to identify material financial and operational sustainability metrics.
2. Build Auditable Non-Financial Data Pipelines: Automate ESG data collection within core accounting software to ensure data integrity.
3. Align Sustainability with Annual Financial Filings: Prepare non-financial disclosures concurrently with financial statements to satisfy regulatory audit expectations.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Modernizing Internal Controls: Machine Learning and Continuous Monitoring in Auditing

Published

on

Internal audit departments and corporate risk managers are modernizing internal control frameworks by shifting from periodic sampling techniques to continuous monitoring and machine learning analytics. As operational data volumes increase across enterprise organizations, automated control testing ensures financial integrity, prevents corporate fraud, and streamlines annual audit engagements.

The Limitation of Periodic Audit Sampling
Historically, internal and external auditors evaluated internal controls by reviewing random samples of financial transactions—often analyzing less than five percent of total ledger entries. In complex enterprise environments, periodic sampling methods carry inherent risks of overlooking localized financial misstatements, unauthorized disbursements, or operational control breakdowns.

In 2026, progressive internal audit functions are utilizing automated continuous monitoring platforms that evaluate one hundred percent of financial transactions in real time. Continuous control auditing systems continuously monitor general ledger entries, procurement approvals, and expense reimbursements across all operating subsidiaries.

AI-Powered Fraud Detection and Anomaly Identification
Machine learning models trained on historical corporate financial data excel at identifying subtle transactional anomalies that indicate potential fraud or operational error. Automated systems instantly flag duplicate invoice payments, unapproved vendor creation, unusual journal entry timing, and unauthorized override of authority thresholds.

When an anomaly is detected, the automated auditing platform generates an instant risk alert, allowing internal audit teams to investigate root causes immediately. Early detection prevents minor operational errors from escalating into material weaknesses in financial reporting.

Streamlining External Audit Preparation
Continuous internal control monitoring delivers significant benefits during annual external financial audits. External audit firms can review continuous audit logs and automated control testing documentation, reducing the time required for manual field testing.

This integrated approach lowers overall audit compliance fees, reduces administrative burdens on corporate accounting staff, and provides senior management and audit committees with real-time visibility into the organization’s overall risk profile.

Core Implementation Guidelines
1. Transition to 100% Data Testing: Replace legacy sampling methods with automated continuous audit monitoring systems.
2. Deploy Anomaly Detection Algorithms: Implement machine learning models to identify unauthorized transactions and operational control overrides.
3. Align Internal and External Audit Workflows: Coordinate continuous control testing protocols with external auditors to optimize annual compliance cycles.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Tax Compliance and Global Regulatory Harmonization in 2026

Published

on

Corporate tax accounting departments are navigating an era of unprecedented regulatory complexity as global tax harmonization frameworks take full effect alongside real-time digital tax reporting mandates. Tax directors and accounting teams are adopting cloud-based tax compliance automation tools to manage multi-jurisdictional tax liabilities and satisfy stringent reporting rules across international jurisdictions.

Implementation of Global Minimum Tax Provisions
The implementation of international tax reform agreements—notably the Pillar Two global minimum tax framework—has reshaped multinational corporate tax planning. Multinational enterprises with consolidated revenues exceeding established thresholds must ensure an effective tax rate of at least 15% across every jurisdiction in which they operate.

Accounting teams are implementing specialized tax calculation modules integrated directly into enterprise resource planning (ERP) platforms. These automated tools calculate effective tax rates per country, identify top-up tax liabilities, and generate standardized compliance documentation required by national tax authorities.

Real-Time Digital Invoicing and E-Reporting Mandates
Tax authorities across Europe, Latin America, and Asia-Pacific have enacted mandatory electronic invoicing (e-invoicing) and continuous transaction controls (CTC). Under these systems, corporate transaction data must be submitted electronically to government portals in real time at the point of sale or invoice issuance.

This shift toward continuous digital tax reporting eliminates traditional annual tax audits in favor of ongoing automated compliance monitoring. Accounting departments are upgrading invoicing software to ensure seamless XML data formatting, digital signature authentication, and real-time validation against tax authority databases.

Automation and Data Analytics in Corporate Tax Strategy
To keep pace with dynamic tax legislation, tax departments are transitioning from reactive compliance teams to proactive strategic advisors. Machine learning algorithms analyze corporate transactional data to identify tax credits, research and development (R&D) incentives, and cross-border transfer pricing adjustments.

By automating routine tax return filings and calculations, corporate tax directors can focus on long-term capital structuring, evaluating the tax implications of corporate mergers, and optimizing international supply chain networks.

Strategic Priorities for Tax Executives
1. ERP System Upgrades: Ensure enterprise software is capable of generating real-time, granular tax data required for global minimum tax compliance.
2. E-Invoicing Integration: Implement scalable e-invoicing platforms to satisfy regional continuous transaction control regulations.
3. Strategic Tax Analytics: Utilize predictive tax modeling tools to evaluate structural changes in corporate operations and cross-border trade.

Continue Reading

Trending