As the presidential campaign heats up and with a hotly anticipated debate coming between Vice President Kamala Harris and former President Donald Trump, a tax expert is weighing in with his thoughts about the child tax credit and other proposals.
“The Harris campaign is right to focus on providing relief for child care,” said Rick Lazio, a former Republican congressman from New York and current senior vice president of the tax consulting firm Alliantgroup. “The cost of child care has spiked over the past several years. This is often a barrier to women who would like to stay in the workforce, as well as those who wish to enter the workforce. In either case, the economy is denied workers who are in demand. However, the high price tag for the child tax credit is an overreach and should be targeted to help those who are low wage earners. Well run organizations look to outcome-based data to determine whether the money spent is translating to the measurable outcomes that were promised. The Harris campaign team would score points for using more private sector discipline in pursuit of the public mission. Boosting affordable housing would likely provide an even better cost-based outcome than untargeted tax credits for families with children.”
During Harris’ interview Thursday night with CNN’s Dana Bash, she and her running mate, Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, discussed a proposed expansion of the child tax credit.
“For example, extending the child tax credit to $6,000 for families for the first year of their child’s life to help them buy a car seat, to help them buy baby clothes, a crib,” said Harris when asked what she would do on day one of her administration if she were elected. “There’s the work that we’re gonna do that is about investing in the American family around affordable housing, a big issue in our country right now. So there are a number of things on day one.”
“What we need to do to extend the child tax credit to help young families be able to take care of their children in their most formative years,” she later added. “What we need to do to bring down the cost of housing. My proposal includes what would be a tax credit of $25,000 for first-time home buyers so they can just have enough to put a down payment on a home, which is part of the American dream and their aspiration, but do it in a way that allows them to actually get on the path to achieving that goal and that dream.”
Walz pointed out that his state had a child tax credit of its own. “Well, I’m excited about this agenda, too. As I said, the idea of inspiring America to what can be. And I think many of these things that the vice president’s proposing are — are things that we share in values. And the child tax credit’s one we know that reduces childhood poverty by a third. We did it in Minnesota. To have a federal partner in this —unbelievable, I think, in the impact that we can make.”
Lazio would like to see the Harris campaign do more on tax policy. “I’m scratching my head to understand why, overall, the Harris campaign has been silent on a growth agenda for tax policy,” he said. “We can’t bring opportunity to lower-income Americans without private sector growth. People of color and lower wealth Americans want opportunities to own a house, build a business, have a full range of good financial options. Those opportunities won’t open up without an expanded private sector. Government and healthcare service jobs alone won’t do it.”
He wants to see an extension of pro small business tax provisions from the Harris campaign. “Where is the Harris campaign on incentivizing innovation, helping American companies compete with state subsidized behemoths, supporting the small businesses that employ more than half of American workers?” Lazio added. ” Opportunity and growth are inextricably linked. Only in a single moment during her DNC speech did Harris mention small-business owners, noting she’d lift them up by opening access to capital. However, there are even more effective ways to jumpstart their innovation. Up until recently, small businesses have generated most of the industry innovation in America, while employing half of working Americans. Yet, small businesses today are facing a uniquely troubling and urgent crisis as their ability to conduct research and development continues to remain hamstrung. For Harris to truly aid small business owners, her tax plans must incentivize them to innovate by fixing the disastrous impacts of recent R&D tax changes. Removing barriers to small business success — including allowing them to amortize R&D spending over multiple years and preserving the IRS Section 199 provision for pass-through businesses — will be a key barometer for how well Harris can grow the economy.”
The Financial Accounting Standards Board issued a proposed accounting standards update Tuesday to establish authoritative guidance on the accounting for government grants received by business entities.
U.S. GAAP currently doesn’t provide specific authoritative guidance about the recognition, measurement, and presentation of a grant received by a business entity from a government. Instead, many businesses currently apply the International Financial Reporting Standards Foundation’s International Accounting Standard 20, Accounting for Government Grants and Disclosure of Government Assistance, by analogy, at least in part, to account for government grants.
In 2022 FASB issued an Invitation to Comment, Accounting for Government Grants by Business Entities—Potential Incorporation of IAS 20, Accounting for Government Grants and Disclosure of Government Assistance, into GAAP. In response, most of FASB’s stakeholders supported leveraging the guidance in IAS 20 to develop accounting guidance for government grants in GAAP, believing it would reduce diversity in practice because entities would apply the guidance instead of analogizing to it or other guidance, thus narrowing the variability in accounting for government grants.
The proposed ASU would leverage the guidance in IAS 20 with targeted improvements to establish guidance on how to recognize, measure, and present a government grant including (1) a grant related to an asset and (2) a grant related to income. It also would require, consistent with current disclosure requirements, disclosure about the nature of the government grant received, the accounting policies used to account for the grant, and significant terms and conditions of the grant, among others.
FASB is asking for comments on the proposed ASU by March 31, 2025.
“It will not be a cut and paste of IAS 20,” said FASB technical director Jackson Day during a session at Financial Executives International’s Current Financial Reporting Insights conference last week. “First of all, the scope is going to be a little bit different, probably a little bit more narrow. Second of all, the threshold of recognizing a government grant will be based on ‘probable,’ and ‘probable’ as we think of it in U.S. GAAP terms. We’re also going to do some work to make clarifications, etc. There is a little bit different thinking around the government grants for assets. There will be a deferred income approach or a cost accumulation approach that you can pick. And finally, there will be different disclosures because the disclosures will be based on what the board had previously issued, but it does leverage IAS 20. A few other things it does as far as reducing diversity. Most people analogized IAS 20. That was our anecdotal findings. But what does that mean? How exactly do they do that? This will set forth the specifics. It will also eliminate from the population those that were analogizing to ASC 450 or 958, because there were a few of those too. So it will go a long way in reducing diversity. It will also head down a model that will be generally internationally converged, which we still think about. We still collaborate with the staff [of the International Accounting Standards Board]. We don’t have any joint projects, but we still do our best when it makes sense to align on projects.”
Mauled Again (http://mauledagain.blogspot.com/): Not long ago, about a dozen states would seize property for failure to pay property taxes and, instead of simply taking their share of unpaid taxes, interest, and penalties and returning the excess to the property owner, they would pocket the entire proceeds of the sales. Did high court intervention stem this practice? Not so much.
Current Federal Tax Developments (https://www.currentfederaltaxdevelopments.com/): In Surk LLC v. Commissioner, the Tax Court was presented with the question of basis computations related to an interest in a partnership. The taxpayer mistakenly deducted losses that exceeded the limitation in IRC Sec. 704(d), raising the question: Should the taxpayer reduce its basis in subsequent years by the amount of those disallowed losses or compute the basis by treating those losses as if they were never deducted?
Parametric (https://www.parametricportfolio.com/blog): If your clients are using more traditional commingled products for their passive exposures, they may not know how much tax money they’re leaving on the table. A look at possible advantages of a separately managed account.
Turbotax (https://blog.turbotax.intuit.com): Whether they’re talking diversification, gainful hobby or income stream, what to remind them about the tax benefits of investing in real estate.
The National Association of Tax Professionals (https://blog.natptax.com/): Q&A from a recent webinar on day cares’ unique income and expense categories.
Boyum & Barenscheer (https://www.myboyum.com/blog/): For larger manufacturers, compliance under IRC 263A is essential. And for all manufacturers, effective inventory management goes beyond balancing stock levels. Key factors affecting inventory accounting for large and small manufacturing businesses.
Withum (https://www.withum.com/resources/): A look at the recent IRS Memorandum 2024-36010 that denied the application of IRC Sec. 245A to dividends received by a controlled foreign corporation.
PwC made a $1.5 million investment to Bryant University, in Smithfield, Rhode Island, to fund the launch of the PwC AI in Accounting Fellowship.
The experiential learning program allows undergraduate students to explore AI’s impact in accounting by way of engaging in research with faculty, corporate-sponsored projects and professional development that blends traditional accounting principles with AI-driven tools and platforms.
The first cohort of PwC AI in Accounting Fellows will be awarded to members of the Bryant Honors Program planning to study accounting. The fellowship funds can be applied to various educational resources, including conference fees, specialized data sheets, software and travel.
“Aligned with our Vision 2030 strategic plan and our commitment to experiential learning and academic excellence, the fellowship also builds upon PwC’s longstanding relationship with Bryant University,” Bryant University president Ross Gittell said in a statement. “This strong partnership supports institutional objectives and includes the annual PwC Accounting Careers Leadership Institute for rising high school seniors, the PwC Endowed Scholarship Fund, the PwC Book Fund, and the PwC Center for Diversity and Inclusion.”
Bob Calabro, a PwC US partner and 1988 Bryant University alumnus and trustee, helped lead the development of the program.
“We are excited to introduce students to the many opportunities available to them in the accounting field and to prepare them to make the most of those opportunities, This program further illustrates the strong relationship between PwC and Bryant University, where so many of our partners and staff began their career journey in accounting” Calabro said in a statement.
“Bryant’s Accounting faculty are excited to work with our PwC AI in Accounting Fellows to help them develop impactful research projects and create important experiential learning opportunities,” professor Daniel Ames, chair of Bryant’s accounting department, said in a statement. “This program provides an invaluable opportunity for students to apply AI concepts to real-world accounting, shaping their educational journey in significant ways.”