Connect with us

Accounting

Tax planning as the election nears

Published

on

As we approach the upcoming presidential election, the potential impact on tax policy becomes a crucial point of discussion. The uncertainty surrounding tax policy can make future planning a challenge for both taxpayers and their advisors. This election season could have a more significant effect on tax policy than most. How can CPAs guide their clients through this potential volatility in tax policy?

First and foremost, it is important to understand why this election could be so consequential. To grasp this, we need to revisit the passing of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act in 2017.  When the TCJA was passed, Republicans held the House, Senate and presidency. However, the Republican majority in the Senate was slim, and due to the partisan nature of the bill, they were forced to pass the bill through reconciliation.  

Under the Byrd rule, a reconciliation bill cannot increase the deficit beyond the 10-year budgetary window. Additionally, the budget resolution that allowed reconciliation to begin included a self-imposed limit of $1.5 trillion within the budget window. This meant that many of the provisions under the TCJA had to be temporary to meet the reconciliation restrictions.

In order to meet the reconciliation requirements, the TCJA included multiple revenue-raising provisions. This included the amortization requirement of 174, which began in 2022, a reduction in bonus depreciation in 2023, changes to 163(j) starting in 2022, among many others. However, the changes to individual tax rates that will take effect in 2026 are expected to significantly increase tax bills. The TCJA altered tax brackets for most taxpayers until the end of 2025, but these adjustments are set to expire soon. Neither political party wants to raise taxes on taxpayers earning under $400,000 per year, yet their approaches to resolving this issue vary drastically.

Former President Trump has expressed interest in renewing and making permanent TCJA provisions. At the same time, Vice President Harris has expressed interest in renewing tax brackets for those making under $400,000 but raising tax brackets for those in higher income brackets. Additionally, the Harris team has proposed raising top marginal tax rates back up to pre-TCJA levels and increasing corporate tax rates to 28%. The ability of either candidate to change the tax code will depend not only on whether they win but also on the makeup of the House and Senate in 2025.

What are taxpayers and their advisors to do in the meantime? The short answer is to continue as if nothing will change. Although we know what the candidates have stated on the campaign trail, it’s too early to know what changes will be enacted. While it is possible that a new administration may move quickly to change tax law, tax brackets are not slated to change until 2026. This means there is still plenty of time for taxpayers to plan for both the 2024 and 2025 tax years.

Furthermore, delaying plans under the threat of change can also be risky.  For example, in 2008, when President Obama won the election, many taxpayers decided to delay taking deductions because they were concerned that the Bush tax cuts would expire, and their tax rates might go up. However, the Bush tax cuts were extended until 2012, and the United States moved into a recession. As a result, many taxpayers found that the deductions they had held onto became less valuable as their taxable income dropped. Some taxpayers even found the deductions were not needed or were used against lower marginal tax rates due to the decrease in income.

For most taxpayers, maximizing credits, deductions and other tax planning opportunities is critical, even in a volatile election year. Maximizing tax deductions and credits can allow businesses to access opportunities over the next few years.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending