While much has happened during the past few years, and significant change lies immediately ahead, there is little that is new in the upcoming tax season. However, beneficial ownership reporting and tariffs — which are not part of the typical issues that preparers deal with — are visible on the horizon as potential topics of concern.
This filing season appears to be business as usual for now, for most accounting professionals, according to Misty Erickson, tax content program manager at the National Association of Tax Professionals. “That said, there are a few things to keep in mind. With the ever-changing landscape with BOI reporting, business owners that have not already filed, and need to, may be dealing with a tax deadline and a BOI deadline at the same time. While we wait for a new deadline to be announced, this is something to keep in mind and be prepared to advise clients on next steps.”
And keep in mind the executive order regarding a hiring freeze at the IRS, she warned: “This could impact service levels. There are online tools available for tax professionals. It might be beneficial to see if you can complete the action needed online first before calling in.”
Donald Trump
Al Drago/Photographer: Al Drago/Bloomberg
“Also, be on the lookout for taxpayers that purchased an electric vehicle,” she advised. “If they did, do they have a Form 15400, “Clean Vehicle Sellers Report”? This is the report dealers will issue to both the buyers and the IRS for vehicles that qualify for either the clean vehicle credit or the used clean vehicle credit. Tax professionals will need this information to reconcile or claim the credit on their client’s return. Without the form, the credit should not be claimed. Clients can request a copy from the dealer if they believe the vehicle qualifies for the credit.”
A former IRS attorney and head of BOI reporting at FinCEN Guidance, Milan Solarz-Patel addressed the current status of BOI reporting: “While the Supreme Court has granted the government’s request to stay the nationwide injunction in the Texas Top Cop Shop case, the Smith case — also from the Eastern District of Texas, but before a different judge — has resulted in another nationwide injunction that remains in effect. FinCEN has acknowledged the Smith case in its latest alert, confirming that BOI reporting is still paused for now. Reporting companies are not currently required to file but may choose to do so voluntarily.”
“This legal merry-go-round — where one nationwide injunction is lifted only to have another take its place — continues to leave businesses in limbo,” he added. “The Smith case is, in many ways, deja vu, highlighting how fragmented and chaotic the judicial landscape has become for CTA enforcement.”
While the Smith injunction creates yet another temporary pause, the CTA’s bipartisan origins and necessity for international anti-money laundering efforts make it highly likely that the law will ultimately be found constitutional. “The forthcoming decision in an Alabama case currently before the 11th Circuit is expected to provide far more substantive guidance,” Solarz-Patel said.
Jill DeWitt, senior director of compliance and third-party risk management solutions at Moody’s, agreed: “This law was designed to align the U.S. globally with financial transparency, especially around beneficial ownership of entities to help prevent terrorist organizations, organized criminals, and other bad actors from exploiting the U.S. financial system and hiding their illicitly obtained financial gains. While arguments against burdening small businesses with the requirements of beneficial ownership compliance and of financial reporting are understandable, greater transparency could help raise financial institutions’ awareness of bad actors in their customer base and support them in avoiding onboarding bad actors who might have otherwise been hidden or overlooked.”
Define a ‘normal’ tax season
The uncertainty brings increased chances for error, as CPAs rush to meet tight deadlines, deal with obstinate clients, and bone up on areas of tax law with which they may be unfamiliar.
“Probably the most prevalent risk is changes in the regs and accounting standards,” according to Avin Fennell, vice president and senior risk advisor at Aon, program manager for the AICPA Professional Liability Program. It’s important to have a good source for tax news and regulations updates, and to rank clients based on need so you can do a proper resource allocation for each client based on their need. It’s easy to get caught up in the work itself. There has to be a lot of planning beforehand. Decide what you need from each client so you can manage them from a resource perspective. At the end of the day take a few minutes to plan the next day — what low hanging fruit to do first, and plan a time when you can take a step back and give the staff an opportunity to exhale. If you let stress get to you, it’s an invitation to make errors.”
The wild card in the BOI analysis is that it won’t matter what the courts say if the new administration decides not to prioritize enforcement, noted Roger Harris, president of Padgett Business Services.
Harris anticipates that filing season, at its beginning, “is shaping up to be a traditional normal filing season, whatever that means. Legislation to extend and modify the [Tax Cuts and Jobs Act] is the most anticipated, but politics will make it hard to get anything done quickly.”
It’s too soon to tell how the IRS will fare under proposed budget cuts and a new commissioner, Harris believes: “And the ‘back to work’ orders may have to be revised to accommodate contracts with the union. You can’t just override union policy.”
Although the broker’s obligation to issue Form 1099-DA for crypto transactions has been delayed, you still have to report if you had any transactions, noted tax attorney Barbara Weltman, author of “J.K. Lasser’s Small Business Taxes 2025.” “Income and loss are reported in the usual way – there are new lines on Schedule 1. You have to answer the question at the top of Form 1040. If it’s left blank, they won’t process the return. Just as a reminder, the due date of the return is also the same date as the first installment of estimated tax. They are separate payments, but have the same deadline.”
“Deadlines are extended for certain federally declared disaster areas, including the California wildfires and those affected by hurricane damage in western North Carolina,” she added. “And note that the deadline for putting money into an IRA, a Roth IRA and an HSA are not extended even if the time for filing is extended.”
Tariffs and tax season
The year ahead will be a huge year for tax bills, according to Ryan Losi, executive vice president of Piascik. “It is clear that a tax bill is a high priority for the new Congress and president. The outcome might be favorable for some but not so favorable for others. We’re not sure how tariffs will come into play, whether they will be used to offset taxes. A lot will hedge and extend their return to see if a bill is passed with any retroactive provisions. If so, it’s best to extend and see if that’s the case. Otherwise, file then amend and wait for a refund. It may be easier just to put the return on extension.”
While the threat of a tariff has already been used as a negotiating ploy to change the position of some countries, it remains to be seen if it will be used as a revenue-raiser.
Companies are considering several strategic movies to mitigate the impact of proposed tariffs, according to Mathew Mermigousis, national practice leader and vice president of customs & international trade services at Top 10 Firm BDO USA:
Leveraging the duty drawback program. This can help recover 99% of the customs duties, taxes, and fees paid on imported goods that are subsequently exported or destroyed. It can also be used to recover taxes and fees on imported components used in the manufacture of a product that is later exported or destroyed. Both strategies can be implemented with a retroactive period of five years. (However, the provisions used by the administration to impose a given duty tariff can impact its eligibility for duty drawback. This means that companies looking to use this strategy will need to closely monitor the administration’s policies to determine if this is a viable avenue.)
Utilizing the first sale principle. This can reduce the dutiable value of goods by basing them on the price paid by the first buyer in a series of sales leading to U.S. importation.
Transfer pricing tactics. Businesses can closely coordinate new transfer pricing studies, or update existing ones, with customs valuation rules for related-party pricing. This will help achieve the lowest possible value for customs without running afoul of income tax rules which could lead to double taxation.
Tariff engineering. Since duties are assessed based on the condition of imported goods at the time of import entry, altering this condition can affect their classification and the applicable duty rate. Importers might be able to reclassify goods under different tariff codes if alternative classifications that better match the goods’ composition or functionality. Also, modifying a product’s design or composition during manufacturing can shift its classification to a category with lower tariffs or exclude it from certain punitive tariffs.
Foreign trade zones. Businesses are exploring the use of foreign trade zones to defer or avoid U.S. Customs duties, including reducing the merchandise processing fee paid at the time of import by consolidating shipments on a weekly basis from the FTZ.
Accounting firms are reporting bigger profits and more clients, according to a new report.
The report, released Monday by Xero, found that nearly three-quarters(73%) of firms reportedincreased profits over the past year and 56% added new clients thanks to operational efficiency and expanded service offerings.
Some 85% of firms now offer client advisory services, a big spike from 41% in 2023, indicating a strategic shift toward delivering forward-looking financial guidance that clients increasingly expect.
AI adoptionis also reshaping the profession, with80% of firms confident it will positively affect their practice. Currently, the most common use cases for AI include: delivering faster and more responsive client services (33%), enhancing accuracy by reducing bookkeeping and accounting errors (33%), and streamlining workflows through the automation of routine tasks (32%).
“The widespread adoption of AI has been a turning point for the accounting profession, giving accountants an opportunity to scale their impact and take on a more strategic advisory role,” said Ben Richmond, managing director, North America, at Xero, in a statement. “The real value lies not just in working more efficiently, but working smarter, freeing up time to elevate the human element of the profession and in turn, strengthen client relationships.”
Some of the main challenges faced by firms include economic uncertainty (38%), mastering AI (36%) and rising client expectations for strategic advice (35%).
While 85% of firms have embraced cloud platforms, a sizable number still lag behind, missing out on benefits such as easier data access from anywhere (40%) and enhanced security (36%).
Private equity firms have bought five of the top 26 accounting firms in the past three years as they mount a concerted strategy to reshape the industry.
The trend should not come as a surprise. It’s one we’ve seen play out in several industries from health care to insurance, where a combination of low-risk, recurring revenue, scalability and an aging population of owners create a target-rich environment. For small to midsized accounting firms, the trend is exacerbated by a technological revolution that’s truly transforming the way accounting work is done, and a growing talent crisis that is threatening tried-and-true business models.
How will this type of consolidation affect the accounting business, and what do firms and their clients need to be on the lookout for as the marketplace evolves?
Assessing the opportunity… and the risk
First and foremost, accounting firm owners need to be aware of just how desirable they are right now. While there has been some buzz in the industry about the growing presence of private equity firms, most of the activity to date has focused on larger, privately held firms. In fact, when we recently asked tax professionals about their exposure to private equity funding in our 2025 State of Tax Professionals Report, we found that just 5% of firms have actually inked a deal and only 11% said they are planning to look, or are currently looking, for a deal with a private equity firm. Another 8% said they are open to discussion. On the one hand, that’s almost a quarter of firms feeling open to private equity investments in some way. But the lion’s share of respondents — 87% — said they were not interested.
Recent private equity deal volume suggests that the holdouts might change their minds when they have a real offer on the table. According to S&P Global, private equity and venture capital-backed deal value in the accounting, auditing and taxation services sector reached more than $6.3 billion in 2024, the highest level since 2015, and the trend shows no signs of slowing. Firm owners would be wise to start watching this trend to see how it might affect their businesses — whether they are interested in selling or not.
Focus on tech and efficiencies of scale
The reason this trend is so important to everyone in the industry right now is that the private equity firms entering this space are not trying to become accountants. They are looking for profitable exits. And they will do that by seizing on a critical inflection point in the industry that’s making it possible to scale accounting firms more rapidly than ever before by leveraging technology to deliver a much wider range of services at a much lower cost. So, whether your firm is interested in partnering with private equity or dead set on going it alone, the hyperscaling that’s happening throughout the industry will affect you one way or another.
Private equity thrives in fragmented businesses where the ability to roll up companies with complementary skill sets and specialized services creates an outsized growth opportunity. Andrew Dodson, managing partner at Parthenon Capital, recently commented after his firm took a stake in the tax and advisory firm Cherry Bekaert, “We think that for firms to thrive, they need to make investments in people and technology, and, obviously, regulatory adherence, to really differentiate themselves in the market. And that’s going to require scale and capital to do it. That’s what gets us excited.”
Over time, this could reshape the industry’s market dynamics by creating the accounting firm equivalent of the Traveling Wilburys — supergroups capable of delivering a wide range of specialized services that smaller, more narrowly focused firms could never previously deliver. It could also put downward pressure on pricing as these larger, platform-style firms start finding economies of scale to deliver services more cost-effectively.
The technology factor
The great equalizer in all of this is technology. Consistently, when I speak to tax professionals actively working in the market today, their top priorities are increased efficiency, growth and talent. Firms recognize they need to streamline workflows and processes through more effective use of technology, and they are investing heavily in AI, automation and data analytics capabilities to do that. Private equity firms, of course, are also investing in tech as they assemble their tax and accounting dream teams, in many cases raising the bar for the industry.
The question is: Can independent firms leverage technology fast enough to keep up with their deep-pocketed competition?
Many firms believe they can, with some even going so far as to publicly declare their independence. Regardless of the path small to midsized firms take to get there, technology-enabled growth is going to play a key role in the future of the industry. Market dynamics that have been unfolding for the last decade have been accelerated with the introduction of serious investors, and everyone in the industry — large and small — is going to need to up their games to stay competitive.
The House-passed version of President Donald Trump’s massive tax and spending bill would deliver a financial blow to the poorest Americans but be a boon for higher-income households, according to a new analysis from the Congressional Budget Office.
The bottom 10% of households would lose an average of about $1,600 in resources per year, amounting to a 3.9% cut in their income, according to the analysis released Thursday. Those decreases are largely attributable to cuts in the Medicaid health insurance program and food aid through the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.
Households in the highest 10% of incomes would see an average $12,000 boost in resources, amounting to a 2.3% increase in their incomes. Those increases are mainly attributable to reductions in taxes owed, according to the report from the nonpartisan CBO.
Households in the middle of the income distribution would see an increase in resources of $500 to $1,000, or between 0.5% and 0.8% of their income.
The projections are based on the version of the tax legislation that House Republicans passed last month, which includes much of Trump’s economic agenda. The bill would extend tax cuts passed under Trump in 2017 otherwise due to expire at the end of the year and create several new tax breaks. It also imposes new changes to the Medicaid and SNAP programs in an effort to cut spending.
Overall, the legislation would add $2.4 trillion to US deficits over the next 10 years, not accounting for dynamic effects, the CBO previously forecast.
The Senate is considering changes to the legislation including efforts by some Republican senators to scale back cuts to Medicaid.
The projected loss of safety-net resources for low-income families come against the backdrop of higher tariffs, which economists have warned would also disproportionately impact lower-income families. While recent inflation data has shown limited impact from the import duties so far, low-income families tend to spend a larger portion of their income on necessities, such as food, so price increases hit them harder.
The House-passed bill requires that able-bodied individuals without dependents document at least 80 hours of “community engagement” a month, including working a job or participating in an educational program to qualify for Medicaid. It also includes increased costs for health care for enrollees, among other provisions.
More older adults also would have to prove they are working to continue to receive SNAP benefits, also known as food stamps. The legislation helps pay for tax cuts by raising the age for which able bodied adults must work to receive benefits to 64, up from 54. Under the current law, some parents with dependent children under age 18 are exempt from work requirements, but the bill lowers the age for the exemption for dependent children to 7 years old.
The legislation also shifts a portion of the cost for federal food aid onto state governments.
CBO previously estimated that the expanded work requirements on SNAP would reduce participation in the program by roughly 3.2 million people, and more could lose or face a reduction in benefits due to other changes to the program. A separate analysis from the organization found that 7.8 million people would lose health insurance because of the changes to Medicaid.