Connect with us

Accounting

Tax Strategy: Developments in the taxation of digital assets

Published

on

The taxation of digital assets continues to be an area of confusion. The Internal Revenue Service has long taken the position that digital assets are treated the same as other property and are taxed when you receive them as payment for a transaction or where you sell them or trade them in a transaction. Like other property, digital assets are not taxed when you receive them for cash.

However, issues have come up when digital assets are received for other purposes, such as through forks, mining or staking — transactions involving digital assets which as capital assets would be reported on Form 8949.

The recent focus by the IRS has been on broker reporting of digital asset transactions to try to reduce noncompliance in the area. The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act authorized the broker reporting of digital assets. Form 1099-B, the existing broker reporting form, was initially used for the reporting requirement. Questions arose, however, as to who is a broker in the digital assets context and whether the entities that the IRS designated as digital asset brokers have the information to make the required reports to the IRS.

The IRS has now developed Form 1099-DA for digital assets. Final regulations on broker reporting were issued on June 28, 2024. The service is hoping to be able to match Form 1099-DA reports from brokers to Form 8949 reports from taxpayers.

Form 1040 reporting

For 2024 tax returns, the digital asset question on the Form 1040 has not changed from 2023: “At any time during 2024, did you: (a) receive (as a reward, award or payment for property or services); or (b) sell, exchange or otherwise dispose of a digital asset (or a financial interest in a digital asset)?”

There are disputes between the IRS and the crypto industry about when crypto is converted into something else. For example, there is currently litigation over whether rewards of additional crypto for staking — the process of locking up your cryptocurrency in a wallet to help run a blockchain — results in a taxable transaction (the view of the IRS if the taxpayer has the ability to sell, exchange or otherwise dispose of the rewards) or a nontaxable transaction (the Jarrett cases).

In Revenue Ruling 2023-14, the IRS reaffirmed its position that staking rewards are taxable. The IRS issued a refund in the first Jarrett case to get a court decision that the issue was moot and no decision on the merits was made. In Rev. Rul. 2023-14, the IRS did not provide any guidance as to how staking awards should be valued. It also stated that it was taking no position at the time as to whether “gas” fees paid to a validator for the cost of the computing power used in the validation process are taxable.

Since digital assets are not viewed by the IRS as securities, the wash sale rules do not apply to digital asset transactions. Digital assets treated as capital assets qualify, along with other capital assets, for tax loss harvesting.

Broker reporting

The issues that have come up with broker reporting of digital asset transactions include who is a broker; getting the brokers to report not only the values of digital assets at the time of the transaction but also the cost basis of those assets; helping broker reporting match taxpayer reporting; and determining what information is available to the brokers to comply with filing the Form 1099-DA.

The final version of the 2025 1099-DA was issued on Jan. 10, 2025. It is to be used for 2025 transactions and issued by Feb. 17, 2026 (electronically by March 31, 2026). The instructions discuss reporting of when the broker is using customer-provided information (Box 8), dates of transfer (Box 12b), and reporting of nonfungible tokens and stable coins.

To assist traditional brokers who only have limited involvement with digital assets, Form 1099-B may still be used for tokenized securities settled or cleared on a limited-access regulated network. To assist brokers in transitioning to the new reporting requirements, the IRS is deferring broker reporting of the cash basis on digital assets until 2026. The IRS is also planning to require that, in determining the digital assets to look at for the cost basis, the taxpayer look only to the particular wallet or account held by the broker, again so that the 1099-DA information is more likely to match the information on the tax return.

Crypto tax

There are issues with calculating the crypto cost basis to apply. Taxpayers would generally prefer to apply specific identification by the taxpayer so that the taxpayer can select the highest-basis crypto that is being sold. The IRS wants the broker custodian of the crypto and even trading front-end service providers (DeFi brokers) to report the cost basis on Form 1099-DA.

The service is also proposing that, to help the crypto broker reporting on Form 1099-DA match what the taxpayer is reporting on the tax return, the cost basis be determined separately for each wallet, rather than being able to combine all similar crypto held in separate wallets. For 2025, Form 1099-DA is being required to be filed by crypto brokers; however, the cost basis is not being required. Litigation is also challenging the application of the broker reporting requirements to DeFi brokers.

Revenue Procedure 2024-28 provides a safe harbor under Code Sec. 1012(c)(1) to allocate unused basis of digital assets held within each wallet or account of the taxpayer as of Jan. 1, 2025. The default allocation of basis is based on first-in/first-out principles; however, the taxpayer or the broker, as directed by the taxpayer, may utilize specific identification. The deadline for making the allocation is the earlier of the date of the first sale in the year or the due date for the 2025 tax return. Frequently asked questions provide guidance as to when specific identification can be used.

Notice 2024-56 provides transitional relief to brokers who fail to report sales of digital assets or fail to do back-up withholding. It also permits brokers to rely on uncertified taxpayer identification numbers for 2026. Several types of transactions are specifically excluded from broker reporting requirements. Notice 2024-57 provides related penalty relief for brokers’ failure to file information returns.

To help crypto brokers get their technology together to do cost-basis reporting, the IRS has delayed the crypto cost-basis reporting requirement until after Dec. 31, 2025. This permits taxpayers to continue to use specific identification for crypto transactions based on the taxpayer’s books and records rather than the broker’s 1099-DA report for 2025. FIFO remains the default treatment for 2025 if the taxpayer does not do specific identification.

Summary

The IRS is still struggling to keep up with all the forms of digital asset transactions as they are developed. It is also struggling to get effective third-party reporting by brokers in order to reduce taxpayer noncompliance. In the meantime, the crypto industry hopes that the Trump administration might have a friendlier tax view of crypto transactions, and the IRS focus might change under new leadership.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending