As of this writing, around 150 federal disaster declarations have already been announced for 2024, involving 44 states, two territories, and half a dozen Native American tribes or bands. Hurricane Helene resulted in greater loss of life than any natural disaster since Hurricane Katrina.
After the immediate needs of those affected by disasters for shelter, food, water and communications are met, taxpayers look for help in rebuilding their lives. Both Congress and the Internal Revenue Service have acted to provide tax assistance in response to these disasters.
IRS filing and payment extensions
The IRS routinely issues information releases in response to federal disaster declarations highlighting the tax relief available. This relief includes an extension of filing and payment deadlines for those in the area of the disaster declarations.
In Information Release 2024-253, the IRS addressed tax relief for the Helene disaster declarations. Those disaster areas include the entire states of Alabama, Georgia, North Carolina and South Carolin and 41 counties in Florida, eight counties in Tennessee, and six counties and one city in Virginia. Additional disaster declarations for Hurricane Helene are still possible.
These taxpayers now have until May 1, 2025, to file various federal individual and business tax returns and make tax payments. This includes 2024 individual and business returns normally due during March and April 2025; 2023 individual and corporate tax returns with valid extensions; and quarterly estimated tax payments. It also includes estimated tax payments, quarterly payroll tax returns, and excise tax returns.
The IRS also stated that taxpayers who were already under filing and payment extensions for Tropical Storm Debby and are in the Helene disaster area now are further postponed to May 1, 2025.
The beginning effective date for this extended deadline for disaster relief for Hurricane Helene varies slightly with each disaster declaration: Sept. 22, 2024 in Alabama; Sept. 23 in Florida; Sept. 24 in George; Sept. 25 in North Carolina, South Carolina, and Virginia; and Sept. 26 in Tennessee.
The IRS will automatically provide filing and penalty relief to any taxpayer with an IRS address of record located in the disaster area. The service has specified procedures for other taxpayers who had their records in the disaster area but not their address, who recently moved into the area, or who had tax clients outside of the disaster area to obtain relief.
Casualty loss deductions
In addition to filing and payment extensions, the Tax Code provides a casualty loss deduction for uninsured or unreimbursed federal disaster-related losses.
If the property is personal-use property or is not completely destroyed, the amount of the casualty loss is the lesser of the adjusted basis of the property or the decrease in the fair market value of the property as a result of the casualty. If the property is business or income-producing property, such as rental property, and is completely destroyed, then the amount of the loss is the adjusted basis minus any salvage value, insurance or other reimbursement received or expected to be received.
A casualty loss deduction is claimed as an itemized deduction on Schedule A of Form 1040. Even taxpayers who usually claim the standard deduction rather than itemized deductions may have a large enough casualty loss to warrant itemizing deductions. For property held for personal use, $100 must be subtracted from each casualty event after subtracting any salvage value and any insurance or other reimbursement. All such casualty amounts are then totaled, and 10% of the taxpayer’s adjusted gross income is subtracted from that amount to total the allowable casualty loss deduction for the year.
Route 9 in the aftermath of Hurricane Helene in Bat Cave, North Carolina, on Oct. 1.
Sean Rayford/Photographer: Sean Rayford/Getty
Generally, casualty losses are deductible in the year the loss is sustained, which is generally in the year the casualty occurred. A loss is not considered to have been sustained if there is still a reasonable prospect of recovery through a claim for reimbursement. However, very importantly to potentially get more rapid access to funds to speed recovery, a taxpayer can choose to treat the casualty loss as having occurred in the year immediately preceding the tax year in which the disaster loss was sustained, by filing an amended tax return even if the return for that year has already been filed. This can result in a more rapid refund than waiting to claim the casualty loss deduction when the 2024 tax return is filed in 2025.
Congress has in the past sometimes adopted special relief provisions with respect to casualty losses and specific disaster periods but has not yet done so for 2024 disasters.
Access to retirement funds
If the taxpayer has a retirement plan that permits hardship withdrawals, the taxpayer may be able to withdraw funds from the retirement plan penalty-free, with the right to repay the funds to the plan within three years or to spread the tax due on the withdrawn funds over three years.
Starting in 2024, a retirement plan may also permit a taxpayer to make an emergency withdrawal of up to $1,000 penalty-free.
Exclusion for relief payments
Qualified disaster relief payments from a government agency for necessary disaster-related expenses may generally be excluded from taxable income.
Summary
As of this writing, additional hurricanes are still threatening the East and Gulf Coasts, and wildfires continue to burn in the West. The number of federally declared disasters for 2024 is likely to continue to grow. As it has sometimes done in the past, Congress may, after the November elections, pass legislation that may include some additional tax relief for 2024 disasters.
As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.
Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.
The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.
However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.
WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.
The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.
Untested Legal Mechanism
To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.
White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.
Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.
“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.
USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs
Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).
However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:
Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
Potash and critical minerals
Fish and seafood
Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)
Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.
Canadian Response and Market Reaction
Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.
Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.
Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.
With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.
The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.
The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.
Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.
However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.