Whistleblower lawyers who have long complained that the Internal Revenue Service takes far too long to process tips about tax evasion are billboarding a $74 million payout as a sign of improvement.
Three people shared the award after disclosing an offshore tax-evasion scheme that spanned 15 years, enabling the IRS to collect $263 million from an unidentified individual, according to attorneys for Getnick Law, which helped represent the lead whistleblower. Although it took years to resolve the case, recent policy changes significantly shortened the time it took to pay the whistleblowers, the lawyers said.
“We think that this victory that we have achieved together with the IRS Whistleblower Office is a harbinger for the future,” said Neil Getnick, managing partner at Getnick Law, in an interview.
Pedestrians walk through the IRS headquarters in Washington, D.C.
Andrew Harrer/Bloomberg
The IRS declined to comment, and lawyers for the tipsters didn’t disclose the names of their clients.
Under the IRS program, which began in 2007, about 2,500 tax tipsters have gotten $1 billion for providing information that led to collections of $6 billion. The biggest payout was to former UBS Group AG banker Bradley Birkenfeld, who got $104 million for telling U.S. investigators how his employer helped thousands of Americans evade taxes.
But a process that typically takes a decade or longer has been criticized by whistleblower advocates, who say the IRS has been far less responsive on paying tipsters than the Justice Department, Securities and Exchange Commission and Commodity Futures Trading Commission. In its first five years of existence, the IRS program made no payment, after more than 1,300 tipsters came forward. Since then, the program has lurched forward.
“I realized we needed to work on improving the system,” said John Hinman, who became director of the IRS Whistleblower Office in 2022 after 39 years in various roles at the agency.
High-value claims
In an interview, Hinman said he has expanded the office to 84 employees from 48, with a goal of reaching 130. They’re improving evaluation of tips and working more closely with lawyers who represent whistleblowers, he said.
“We’ve done a lot of work around systems and processes to improve identification of high-value claims,” Hinman said. “We’re continuing to collaborate with whistleblower practitioners.”
IRS investigations of tax claims can take years to resolve as taxpayers pursue possible appeals, delaying any rewards for tipsters. To address that, the agency has sought to make earlier partial payments in cases initiated by whistleblowers, a process known as “disaggregation,” Hinman said.
“We’re looking at our inventory to see what sort of claims we can disaggregate and break apart when their cases are done and there’s been a final determination of tax,” he said. “We’re really hopeful that we can sort of modify our processes to pay awards even sooner.”
Hinman’s efforts are beginning to pay off, said attorney Dean Zerbe, who helped write the whistleblower law when he worked for the Senate and now represents tipsters making claims. He wasn’t involved in the most recent case, but said he expects more awards may be announced in the coming days, before the close of the U.S. government’s fiscal year on Sept. 30.
“The program is absolutely heading in the right direction,” Zerbe said. “They’ve had some growing pains, but Hinman has brought in some new energy.”
Lawyers have complained the agency has long battled whistleblowers over their awards. Under the law, tipsters can reap 15% to 30% of any taxes collected. Those awards are now increasing, according to Zerbe, who represented Birkenfeld and has many pending claims.
In the most recent case, the trio of whistleblowers got the maximum, minus several million dollars under U.S. legislation cutting all government payments, according to their attorneys.
Reducing delay
Chris McLamb, an attorney at Whistleblower Partners who represented another one of the tipsters, said his client benefited from recent improvements to the program. For example, the agency rewarded the whistleblowers for helping it fully recoup money from one taxpayer even as it continues to examine other taxpayers in the case. For years, the IRS typically refused to pay up if there was a chance of recovery from other taxpayers based on a whistleblower’s information.
“That was a major cause for delay,” he said.
Separately, the IRS let the whistleblowers negotiate among themselves on how to divide the award, which helped avoid possible challenges to an agency decision on how to split the bounty, McLamb said. That alone may have shortened the timeframe for collecting the money by years, he said.
“The significant challenge that remains is getting the rest of the IRS, including the investigative arm, to engage more with whistleblowers,” McLamb said.
As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.
Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.
The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.
However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.
WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.
The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.
Untested Legal Mechanism
To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.
White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.
Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.
“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.
USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs
Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).
However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:
Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
Potash and critical minerals
Fish and seafood
Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)
Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.
Canadian Response and Market Reaction
Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.
Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.
Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.
With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.
The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.
The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.
Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.
However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.