Enjoy complimentary access to top ideas and insights — selected by our editors.
Many accountants were doubtful of Donald Trump’s chances for a successful reelection on Nov. 5, despite the fact that many also thought he would be a better candidate for the profession. With his return to the White House now confirmed, the waiting game begins to see which promises of wide-sweeping change to the tax landscape come to life.
The Republican majorities in the Senate and House of Representatives will grant President-elect Trump an easier time in refreshing many of the expiring provisions in his 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, including priorities such as the Qualified Business Income Deduction and 100% bonus depreciation.
“These changes reshaped tax planning for both individuals and businesses, creating new opportunities for savings,” said Arron Bennett, CEO of the Oak Ridge, Tennessee-based tax planning firm Bennett Financials.
It’s increasingly likely that Trump will seek to make certain provisions of the TCJA like the QBID permanent, as was put forward in the Republican party platform earlier this year. Further goals included eliminating taxes on tips for restaurant and hospitality workers and other additional tax cuts.
Mark Luscombe, principal analyst in Wolters Kluwer Tax and Accounting, said cementing the sunsetting provisions of the TCJA “would be very expensive” and that a more beneficial compromise for addressing deficit concerns would be “to just extend them for a few more years.”
“An extension would benefit almost all taxpayers; however, the bulk of the tax benefit would go to higher-income taxpayers,” Luscombe said.
Much of the funding granted to the IRS under the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 has gone towards strengthening the agency’s enforcement capabilities, which in turn generate revenue. Other funds have been used to bolster taxpayer services and to support regular operations.Andrea Harrington, a CPA and partner at the Glastonbury, Connecticut-based accounting firm Fiondella Milone & Lasaracina, said she hopes funding for the IRS is maintained, specifically directing resources towards “processing amended returns related to COVID relief provisions.””The uncertainty over what exactly will happen makes planning a bit more challenging. … We’ll be watching legislative proposals even more closely so we can pivot in our recommendations as needed,” Harrington said.
Below is a compilation of expert insight and predictions into what the tax landscape could look like in 2025 and what professionals need to start considering during planning discussions.
IRS funding in limbo following Trump win
Bloomberg/Bloomberg via Getty Images
In the wake of Trump’s successful bid for reelection, many accountants predict the new administration will seek to cut the IRS’s funding more so than in recent years.
Republican legislators have already seen success in efforts to claw back some of the $80 billion in extra funding from the IRA, and have continued to push for further reductions in the IRS’s enforcement budget. Increased funding brought in from expanded enforcement goes towards easing the cost of the IRA, while other IRA funding is earmarked for strengthening the enforcement capabilities of the IRS among other improvements.
“I think IRS funding is at significant risk right now, both the annual appropriation funding as well as the remaining IRA funding,” Rochelle Hodes, Washington National Tax Office principal at the Top 25 Firm Crowe, said in an interview with AT’s Michael Cohn. “The only question for me on funding is, will any portion of the funding remain available for taxpayer service-related improvements at the IRS?”
A look at Trump promises for the 2025 tax landscape
Parker Michels-Boyce/Bloomberg
Trump’s campaign promises on taxes were numerous and sweeping, ranging from lowering the corporate tax rate and tax credits for caregivers and those purchasing domestically made automobiles, to the return of 100% bonus depreciation.
As the countdown to his second term continues, along with the approaching deadline for many parts of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, much is up in the air.
“No one has a crystal ball on what’s going to happen here, but certainly it’s a little bit clearer based on a Trump victory than it would have been based on a Harris victory,” Brian Newman, a tax partner at Top 25 Firm CohnReznick in Hartford, Connecticut, said in an interview with AT’s Michael Cohn. “Obviously the big point is going to be either to extend or to make permanent TCJA provisions.”
What are preparers worried about in the coming administration?
Al Drago/Photographer: Al Drago/Bloomberg
Accounting professionals and preparers say that a new but not wholly unfamiliar Trump administration, will bring new approaches to taxes and the surrounding regulatory environment with it.
Kelly Myers, an advisor with Myers Consulting Group, and formerly a career IRS officer with 30-plus years of experience, told AT’s Roger Russell in an interview that he’s “curious to see how much the balance shifts” as the lack of a Republican super-majority means, “There will still be a give and take in their congressional negotiations.”
“People will be watching as they move forward on the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act; the biggest thing is the SALT limitation with its $10,000 cap,” Myers said.
The provisions of the TCJA are top of mind for Trump, as issues like the qualified business income deduction and a renewed R&D credit operating on a dollar-for-dollar basis are up for change.
President-elect Trump had an eventful first term when it came to tax policies, implementing the likes of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Actand more. Amid expiring provisions, and a host of new tax proposals, the question now is which promises he can deliver on.
The estimated price tag for extending all the provisions of the TCJA amounts to roughly $4.6 trillion, according to Rochelle Hodes, Washington National Tax Office principal at the Top 25 Firm Crowe.
“If they are allowed to expire, that would raise the tax for many individuals, which is an unattractive proposition for any president or for Congress,” Hodes said in an interview with AT. “The decision will have to be made about which will be allowed to expire, whether or not some of the provisions will be changed in order to accommodate whatever budget goals are agreed upon, then the decision and consensus will have to be made concerning offsets to pay for the resolution of expiring provisions.”
Industry professionals achieved a small measure of TCJA relief following Trump’s successful bid for reelection, as many expiring provisions are now much more likely to be renewed.
Jonathan Traub, the leader of the group, said on a panel this month that discussions in the House surrounding the current limit on the deduction for state and local taxes is an important barometer for measuring how talks could go over the coming years.
“You will need almost perfect unity — more so in the House than the Senate,” Traub said. “This really gives a lot of power, I think, to any small group of House members who decide that they will lie down on the train tracks to block a bill they don’t like or to enforce the inclusion of a provision that they really want.”
As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.
Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.
The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.
However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.
WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.
The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.
Untested Legal Mechanism
To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.
White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.
Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.
“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.
USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs
Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).
However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:
Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
Potash and critical minerals
Fish and seafood
Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)
Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.
Canadian Response and Market Reaction
Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.
Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.
Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.
With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.
The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.
The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.
Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.
However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.