Connect with us

Accounting

Team vs. family | Accounting Today

Published

on

My nine-year-old daughter likes to play a game with me called: “Will you still love me, if?” I’m not sure how many more years we can play this game, but for now it’s pretty innocent. For instance, my daughter will ask me if I’ll still love her if she doesn’t do her homework or clean up her room or play nicely with her younger sister. As always, my response is: “Yes, I’ll still love you more than anything because I’m your dad.” It’s unconditional. We’re family.

I bring this up because in the intense war for talent in our industry, more and more firms are calling themselves a family. I think this can be dangerous. Maybe for some firms this is an intentional decision, and “family” is the word they want to use. But trust me, the specific words you use for firmwide communication matter a great deal.  As long as you understand the implications, great. So, let’s talk about what that means.

There are three important ways that work teams may be different from your family: 

The distinction comes down to purpose, expectations and commitment.

1. Purpose

The purpose of a family is to provide emotional support and unconditional love to kin. 

The purpose of a team is to accomplish an objective. If you’re the Kansas City Chiefs or Dallas Cowboys, the purpose of the team is to win football games. If you are a professional services firm, the purpose of the team is to provide exceptional professional advice to your clients so they can make better financial decisions. It’s not about providing people with unconditional love or making them feel good about themselves. 

2. Expectations

Expectations of a family: It doesn’t matter what family members do or say, the expectation is that they will always be loved. As a family member, you can always feel free to be yourself without judgment from your parents and siblings.

Expectations of a team: When you join a team, you will be (or should be) given clear expectations about what it takes to stay on the team. The expectations are more regimented. Each team member must be accountable. Each team member must honor deadlines and hit deliverables that help the team accomplish its purpose. Families generally don’t ask underperformers to leave, but teams do.

3. Commitment

Family commitment is unconditional. There is nothing my daughter can do to cause me to deny her unconditional love. I’ll always be her dad. It’s a lifelong commitment. 

Team commitment is more transitory. Sometimes you join a team for a certain reason. For instance, when starting your career, you may join a firm or team as an intern to gain a certain kind of work experience. It doesn’t mean you have to stay there for your entire life — it’s not your family. As you go through your career, you’ll find that certain firms, certain places and certain teams are good for you at a certain stage in your life. But then you reach a point that you may need to find a different team as you evolve.

If the purpose of your current team doesn’t align with what you’re trying to do, you don’t have to remain committed to staying with them. That’s why teams sometimes let go of their team members, and that’s why team members sometimes leave their teams. Their purposes are no longer aligned. If you’re clear about your purpose, you’re going to attract the right people, and you’re going to “graduate” the people who are no longer the right fit for your team. 

Language sets the tone

When you’re thinking about the language that you use at your firm, it’s important for every single person to know they’re part of a team. The team has a specific purpose that it’s trying to accomplish. That purpose should be clear to everyone on the team. Everyone from senior leadership to admin staff should have specific expectations about how they’re supposed to contribute to the team and help it achieve its strategic purpose. It doesn’t center around making everyone on the team feel good, although many people on well-run “championship” teams do feel inspired. It’s about meeting expectations.

For more about the importance of nuanced language, see my recent article Are you selling toothfish or sea bass?

In many workplaces, teammates develop relationships just like they do on sports teams. They become great friends and sometimes start to feel like family. The challenge is that people sometimes end up on a team to which they are no longer aligned, but they feel obligated to stay on a team out of loyalty. Or sometimes the team feels obligated to keep a team member on the payroll because they’re getting the concept of team and family confused. 

Work is not your family

If a teammate calls you on a Sunday when you’re out with your family, do you take the call and keep your family waiting? Do you invite them to come over to the house all the time? No, you probably don’t. That person is not part of your actual family. You shouldn’t take their call like you would from a family member late at night. There need to be boundaries, and failing to establish those boundaries can be detrimental to your team, and your family.

You need to have those important conversations and ask, “Are we aligned in our purpose? Do we have clear expectations? Are we committed to the growth of the firm? Are we aligned with committed expectations and purpose?”

Again, the purpose of a family is to nurture each other and provide emotional support and unconditional love. There’s no time limit on that. It’s forever. The purpose of a team is to accomplish its stated objectives by having the right people in the right seats at the right stages of their career. Teams must constantly reassess their lineup and depth chart.

If you feel you are aligned with your team’s purpose and are clear on the expectations, then it makes sense to stay if you feel you are growing. Otherwise, you need to think about moving to another team where you feel there’s better alignment between your respective goals and purpose. You are, after all, a free agent. Families don’t have free agents.

How are you keeping your team aligned with your firm’s expectations and purpose? I’d love to hear from you.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending