Connect with us

Accounting

Technological transformation in accounting: Be mindful, purposeful, and flexible

Published

on

Thirty-nine percent — that’s how much more revenue per employee firms that are “early adopters” of technology make. 

That number, from a recent RightWorks survey, surprised even me. But it makes sense. The accountant shortage is taking a toll on the millions of small businesses in the United States. Anything that makes firms more efficient in providing service will automatically increase revenue potential, especially if that practice is also optimizing its billing structure. 

The information age, beginning all the way back in the 1980s, created opportunities for businesses of all kinds, including accounting firms, to be more efficient and streamline their processes. But firms didn’t modernize in one fell swoop. In fact, “going paperless” is a discussion some firms are still having. Technological transformation is an ongoing process, and firms need to adapt at a pace that makes sense for them and their clients.

For instance, cloud technology is a given today. Having all your information in one, secure, accessible place is beneficial to staff and clients. Firms report that security is a top concern and reason for hesitation on full cloud adoption, but firms that have completed migrations into a completely integrated cloud system typically report that security (and accessibility) are the top benefits.

When creating a strategy for technological transformation at your firm, remember that advancements in technology are so rapid and fast-moving that concerns from a decade ago may not be relevant today. Of course, security should always be top of mind, and cyber insurance is something to consider. The AICPA offers the AICPA Professional Liability Policy, and there are many other third-party organizations that provide this type of coverage. But also important to remember is that what used to be true, often is not anymore.

For example, firms used to consider the best-of-breed pieces of technology for each need: the best portal technology to speak to clients; the best tax software; the best data analytics tool. Then, as software companies began to offer suites of technology that provided everything a firm would need, where all the pieces talked to each other, that became the norm. Now things are shifting back a bit — it’s possible now to find the best of breed in technology and use third-party APIs to connect those pieces seamlessly. The bottom line is, when creating your technology strategy, think flexibly. Technology changes so quickly that you want to be able to adapt with it — but not so impulsively that you’re changing your stack every year. 

I do see a shift away from platform-based shops — i.e., firms that use primarily one technology provider for their technology stack. It’s an exciting time. Much more is possible these days with API connectors and the right staff to manage the technology (more firms are hiring non-CPA IT staff for this or outsourcing the job during adoption). But at the same time, as always, firms should be careful and deliberate in their technology stack planning.

2024 AI

MangKangMangMee – stock.adobe.com

Artificial intelligence is on the rise. While AI is just automatically embedded in more and more software, some firms also adopt simple tools, such as AI-driven chatbots to perform preliminary conversations with prospective clients through their websites. But clients don’t love them. A recent Harvard Business Review study found that 66% of customers using chatbots (in the telecommunications industry) rated the experience a 1 out of 5. Clients don’t like feeling like they’re speaking with a robot, and AI chatbots aren’t developed enough as yet to give nuanced information or answer complex questions. This is fine if all you require from your chatbot is simple, entry-level conversation, but keep in mind that technology isn’t serving you if the client isn’t happy.

AI is embedded in all kinds of software today, non-client facing and otherwise. But the point is, it’s important to be careful and not rush into adopting technology simply because it’s new and attractive. Yes, early adopters of technology broadly see a lot of benefit — but it behooves small and midsized firms to make a comprehensive plan, consult with experts, and be mindful and purposeful when building their technology stack. Especially because technology is a significant investment.

Think about what drives your firm. Is it primarily tax services? Great — you need a tax platform, and a compliance platform that makes sense. Then think about what supplemental services support what drives your firm. Maybe you’d like to add a piece of technology to provide tax strategy help to clients. Then you want to ask, “How do I layer this into my tech stack?” Decide as a firm what services you are in, what you are offering, and how to deliver these in the best way. And then to tie it all together — what is your internal process of communications to make sure you’re not missing anything?

Finally, remember that you don’t have to do it all on your own. Firms can hire temporary staff to help them through their technology transformation process, or outsource their IT and technological needs to companies that provide such services such as TechGuru or ImagineIT. As you go through this process, do it mindfully, purposefully, and with the ability to be flexible as technological advancement continues to progress.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending