Connect with us

Accounting

Tesla’s adjusted earnings got 12% bump from omitting crypto loss

Published

on

Tesla Inc. reported its worst quarter in years, but the unofficial measure it touted to Wall Street got a little help: a slight boost from backing out the dip in the value of its crypto holdings. 

The move bumped its so-called non-GAAP earnings by about 12%. Coupled with stripping out the much bigger cost of stock compensation, the electric vehicle maker reported adjusted earnings more than double its official net income — to about $900 million from about $400 million. 

The Securities and Exchange Commission reviews company supplemental earnings to ensure they aren’t overly rosy, and it has previously scrutinized companies for similar moves. In April 2024, the SEC called out Bitcoin miner Marathon Digital Holdings Inc. for removing the boost in the value of its crypto holdings from its unofficial profit metrics in an earnings release. Marathon agreed to heed the SEC going forward. 

The amount of crypto losses Tesla excluded from its non-GAAP earnings is $97 million and digital assets aren’t a significant part of Tesla’s operations. Elon Musk had announced the firm would buy crypto in 2021, but then the company sold much of it a year later.

The SEC usually pays attention to consistency in supplemental earnings measures. When crypto values rose at the end of 2024, Tesla reported about a $600 million benefit, which the company kept in its non-GAAP earnings. 

If the value of Bitcoin soars next quarter, the SEC may scrutinize how Tesla reports it, said Olga Usvyatsky, an accounting analyst.

“If they suddenly eliminate the adjustment during a quarter when Bitcoin shows gains, that would be a red flag,” Usvyatsky said. 

Companies are allowed to use non-GAAP measures to give investors a clearer view of core performance by taking away one-time costs or unusual expenses. They can’t go too far afield, and the SEC frequently warns businesses about presenting metrics that skeptics call “earnings before bad stuff.” 

The Financial Accounting Standards Board published a rule in December 2023 requiring companies that hold crypto to report their tokens at fair value, a measurement technique that aims to capture the highs and lows of notoriously volatile assets.

Tesla didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment. The company’s chief financial officer, Vaibhav Taneja, acknowledged how the new accounting impacted the company’s earnings on an analyst call Tuesday.

“With the adoption of the new mark-to-market standard for Bitcoin, we expect increased volatility in our other income in addition to the FX equivalent,” Taneja said.

Continue Reading

Accounting

FASB Standardizes Carbon Offsets Accounting Rules

Published

on

FASB Standardizes Carbon Offsets Accounting Rules

In a decisive move toward standardized environmental financial reporting, accounting standards boards issued updated implementation guidance during the week ending July 25, 2026, regarding the formal recognition and valuation of corporate carbon offsets and environmental credits. The revised frameworks establish precise rules for how enterprises must measure, record, and disclose carbon credits on balance sheets, eliminating years of inconsistent reporting practices across public capital markets.

Under the finalized accounting standard, purchased carbon offsets can no longer be categorized under vague administrative expenses or unstandardized intangible asset accounts. Instead, organizations must classify environmental credits based on underlying operational intent—distinguishing between credits held for immediate compliance compliance obligations, long-term offset obligations, or active market trading. Furthermore, companies are required to evaluate carbon holdings for fair value impairment at the end of each reporting period, ensuring that depreciated or low-quality environmental credits do not distort corporate asset values.

The standardized rules carry significant implications for corporate audit committees and chief accounting officers. External audit firms are implementing rigorous verification protocols to validate the physical legitimacy, legal ownership, and scientific permanence of carbon credits claimed on balance sheets. Inaccurate or overstated carbon accounting claims now carry substantial financial litigation risk, alongside potential regulatory enforcement for misleading ESG disclosures.

To remain fully compliant, corporate accounting departments must establish centralized carbon tracking systems integrated into primary standard ERP ledgers. Accounting teams that proactively adopt standardized environmental reporting protocols will build investor credibility, streamline annual audit processes, and insulate their organizations against evolving regulatory scrutiny.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Tax Compliance Tools Reduce Risk

Published

on

Automated Tax Compliance Tools Reduce Risk

Corporate tax departments reached a critical juncture in automated operational management. With nations worldwide rapidly enacting digital service taxes, localized value-added tax (VAT) mandates, and real-time electronic invoicing requirements, manual tax calculations have become obsolete. Modern corporate tax divisions are aggressively deploying AI-driven tax engine software to automate complex cross-border indirect tax calculations in real time.

The imperative for automated tax compliance stems from the sheer complexity of current trade policies and multi-jurisdictional commerce. E-commerce platforms, software vendors, and global manufacturers face constantly changing regional tax rates, statutory exemption rules, and cross-border tariff structures. Automated tax engines embed directly into enterprise enterprise resource planning (ERP) architectures, automatically applying correct tax codes at the point of sale, calculating real-time withholding amounts, and generating compliant e-invoices.

Automated audit trail generation represents another key advantage of modern tax tech integration. Advanced compliance platforms log every transactional tax determination on immutable digital ledgers, providing tax authorities with transparent, self-verifying audit trails. This capability drastically reduces the operational duration and administrative cost of corporate tax audits, protecting enterprises against severe penalties resulting from calculation errors or missed reporting deadlines.

For chief financial officers and tax directors, investing in automated tax compliance is a vital operational risk mitigation strategy. Automating routine tax calculations frees high-level accounting professionals to focus on strategic tax planning, transfer pricing optimization, and risk management in an increasingly complex global economic environment.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Trending