In particular, the need to hire more people in a profession struggling to recruit and retain talent.
Prosperity Partner CEO Jeremy Dubow
Jesse Sutton
“It’s always the people challenge in accounting right now,” shared Jeremy Dubow, CEO of Chicago-based Prosperity Partners, the No. 2 Fastest-Growing Firm this year based on revenue increases over last year. “Everyone talks about it being a labor-constrained industry, and it certainly is, but it’s not so much that it’s labor constrained, it’s how do we do the right things to keep our best people. … Everyone talks about culture, but there is this question of what does it mean? What does culture exactly mean? And we think about it as how do we create the environment where our people want to be there, they want to achieve, they want to thrive. And if we’re doing that, we end up overcoming the biggest challenge in this industry, which is how do you hire the best people and how do you keep them? And you keep them by creating the right environment to allow them to be successful. And I think we’ve done a really great job of that.”
The reality is reflected in the numbers, according to Chad Anschuetz, CEO of Troy, Michigan-based Top 100 Firm Doeren Mayhew.
“I heard an amazing stat the other day. Our profession needs a 4% increase in accountants to be sustainable, yet we’re experiencing a greater than 1% decline since 2019,” he explained. “We’ve gone from over 2 million accountants down to 1.8 million, and not growing and actually declining. India actually has more accountants than the U.S., so the talent pool is shrinking and both the public and the private sectors are fighting for the same CPA and the same talent. And honestly, if we had 20 more experienced personnel, we would even have grown at a higher pace than 24%.”
Alberto Guzman, partner at Coral Gables, Florida-based AbitOs, offered his own unofficial statistics when commenting “if we talk to a hundred firms, 99 will say the number one issue is staffing or people on the growth side.”
PP&Co. senior partner Edward Davis (left) and Smith + Howard CEO Sean Taylor
Jesse Sutton
PP&Co. is no exception to this, according to senior partner Ed Davis, who named both people and resources as challenges for the San Jose, California-based firm.
“We spent a lot of time making sure we had the resources and capabilities to service the growth once we get it,” Davis said. “And so that was one of the big challenges. And then it’s making sure that your processes are up to date, your training’s up to date, as your workflow. As we get bigger and bigger and more and more clients, the complexities of the operational side gets a little bit more difficult and putting in the right people in place to take those over, to make those work effectively and efficiently.”
Like PP&Co., Vancouver, Washington-based Opsahl Dawson also made sure to get a head start on the staffing constraints born of accelerated growth.
“You have got to have the capacity to do the great work and then you have to be able to get through the emotional aspects of change,” advised CEO Aaron Dawson. “So staffing, you have got to have the right staff to be able to perform at the top level. You know your firm has to be desirable to the clients. … We build capacity by hiring ahead of our growth. You have to hire the person before you grow.”
James Mahoney, CEO MahoneySabol, agreed that talent remains a professionwide issue, both in numbers and changing demographics.
“Probably the same thing that everybody’s seeing,” he said when asked about the biggest challenge facing the Glastonbury, Connecticut-based firm. “It’s just just a lack of, really, of talent. You know, top people, younger people that maybe don’t have the entrepreneurial spirit. Another thing I’ve noticed in the market is you don’t see new accounting firms popping up. In my day, being an old-timer, I mean, it was very common for somebody to leave a big firm, start their own firm, and build it.”
The talent-related concern for Omaha, Nebraska-based Bland & Associates is also an operational one, according to managing partner Jeremy Vokt.
“Obviously when you’re 120 people, it all doesn’t work out, or are they maybe in the right seat,” he explained. “The one thing with traction and EOS [Entrepreneurial Operating System], they say is ‘right person, right seat,’ and that’s just not having the right person in the firm. It could be, I may be good at one job, but I’m not sitting in that seat yet, so how do I get their talents to where they can flourish? In our firm, we had to have a few people like that in our firm where that was a challenge to get them in the right seat at that point. We’ve also had people that maybe didn’t fill the skill sets that we needed, so how do we go find those skill sets?”
From left: RS&F managing partner Jeffrey Rosen, Bland & Associates managing partner Jeremy Vokt, and AbitOs managing partner Alberto Guzman
Jesse Sutton
Those skill sets include the latest technology, Vokt continued.
“Technology. How do you find time for all that, especially the fast pace? Everything’s happening right now. Yeah, we’re growing, that’s great, but you have got to find time to test these things out and implement technology and what that means. So it’s kind of a double-edged sword there. The technology and the growth going together, that is a challenge with it.”
Atlanta-based Top 100 Firm Smith + Howard has had to be proactive with its technology.
“I think the main challenges that we face in achieving this growth has more to do with the ability to continue to have the leaders step up in what they do and to have the systems support that growth,” said CEO Sean Taylor. “And so you’re always having to look ahead toward systems improvement ahead of when maybe you will ultimately need them to accompany that growth. So it’s this ever evolving wheel of leadership development, leadership recruitment, and then systems upgrades.”
Managing and messaging the change
Vokt’s Fastest-Growing Firm peers agreed that staying current on technology and all the attendant training requirements can present issues, along with myriad operational snags. Change management, then, is paramount for any high-growth firm, as Steve Stagner, CEO of No. 1 Fastest-Growing Firm Crete Professionals Alliance attests.
“I kind of sometimes feel like we’re building the plane while we’re flying it,” Stagner said of the Top 100 Tampa, Florida-based firm and the several firms in PE-backed Crete’s network. “So with the kind of rapid growth that we’ve had, I think the best way to describe the challenges are really in three different kinds of frameworks. One would be change management, although we’re not mandating change. There’s this balancing act between keeping your local culture, but then if you really want to access the talent and the tools and the technology, it’s very important to get on common platforms. And so really just going through change management and these firms have deeply rooted memory, muscle memory, and systems and processes. And getting alignment with them has always been a challenge.”
Effectively managing change means keeping what works and losing what doesn’t, according to Jeffrey Rosen, managing partner at Towson, Maryland-based RS&F.
“It’s been a lot of change over a period of time, and certainly as change goes, a lot of times people don’t like that,” he shared. “So we’ve had to go through different enhancements over time. We’ve had to adapt in some cases. We’ve had to scrap certain changes or processes that we’ve made. So that certainly has presented its shared challenges, I would say at times bumpy. But I think we’ve always done it, certainly with the right intent, and we have a team who kind of rolls with the punches and is all in.”
Crete Professionals Alliance CEO Steve Stagner
Jesse Sutton
Adapting to change requires as much of a mindset shift as an operational one, then. Albuquerque, New Mexico-based Top 100 Firm REDW has experienced success in the challenging area of recruitment, according to managing principal Steven Cogan, though that achievement requires clear messaging.
“I think the most interesting thing has been to change the culture of the firm and think about how we can have a growth mindset all the time,” Cogan said. “One particular aspect of that is that as we’ve done talent acquisition, sometimes folks are worried or fearful that if we add some additional talent, it’s somehow going to negatively impact their careers. And that if you have kind of a prosperity mindset and a growth mindset, well, we’re all going to be more successful if we add great people to REDW. So we’ve done that really consistently.”
Leaders of successful firms must then also communicate that their growth will not necessarily translate to outgrowth, especially on the client side.
“What ends up happening typically is a lot of clients just, out of not knowing, but just out of saying something: ‘Oh, you’re growing so much, you’re probably outgrowing us,'” shared AbitOs’ Alberto Guzman. “And it’s not. It’s the same firm. It’s the same services. We just happen to do more of it. But that’s a challenge. People will think that just because you’re getting larger or you’re growing, that your services are changing or that you’re changing the firm or the culture and you really are not. You’re just able to give more services and hopefully at the same rate, or even if it’s a higher rate, hopefully you can give them better service or more service.”
For Arlington, Virginia-based Top 100 Firm Ascend, communication was also a challenge, particularly representing its mission as a private equity-backed platform for firms.
Ascend VP of partnerships Maureen Dillmore
Jesse Sutton
“We came to firms with an idea that we wanted to save the middle-market firm while offering the resources of a very large firm, and I think a lot of people just weren’t able to envision that at this point,” explained vice president of partnerships Maureen Dillmore. “And there’s also just kind of a negative connotation with PE. People have had experiences with it throughout other industries. Their clients have had experiences with it. And I think a lot of people just think that PE, once PE gets involved, it’s all about bottom line. You lose your culture, people don’t matter anymore. And so for us to come in and try to prove to be the opposite of that and show that we can be really people-forward amidst having the support of private equity backing, that was definitely a challenge when we first got started.”
In a similar vein of strong messaging and branding, the people at the Fastest-Growing Firms must capitalize on their worth, which Jeanne Bernick empowers them to do as chief client officer at Top 100 Firm Pinion.
“The biggest challenge is really helping our internal accountants and technical experts understand their value,” she explained. “So when you sit down and you’ve walked through a proposal for a client, they continually think, well, I could never charge that much. I’m not worth it. You know, I’m just doing a tax return or I’m just doing this. It’s really coming around to our internal employees and saying, “It’s not just [a tax return], you are worth this.'”
“What you’re doing is saving a family business or it’s improving the profitability of a business and so the value is there,” she continued. “Helping our own internal people understand their value has been really interesting and challenging. But once we’ve started doing workshops around value, it’s like they get it and it’s a win-win for not only them but also the client, because it raises both sides. So I think that has been an interesting challenge.”
As many of the Fastest-Growing Firms outlined their challenges, they recognized the opportunities among them. Specifically, ones that will continue their enormous growth trajectories.
As Stagner put it when describing Crete’s efforts both internally and with its network of firms, “the flip side of that is there’s tremendous opportunity if you go through the change-management process. All the firms… do so many things very well, but they do them very differently. And so it’s very important to kind of harmonize those processes so that we can identify best practices and help them unlock growth.”
The accounting profession is undergoing a fundamental structural transition as enterprise finance departments shift from periodic month-end closes toward automated continuous accounting models. By integrating specialized machine learning algorithms directly into enterprise resource planning (ERP) platforms, chief accounting officers are transforming financial reporting from a retrospective exercise into a real-time operational asset.
The Shift from Periodic Close to Continuous Financial Reporting
Traditional accounting workflows heavily relied on manual data reconciliation, spreadsheet calculations, and multi-week closing cycles at the end of each fiscal period. In contrast, continuous accounting frameworks utilize automated software agents to process, validate, and post transactional data in real time as business activities occur.
Automated bank reconciliation tools cross-reference incoming bank feeds, invoice records, and purchase orders automatically. By resolving transactional variances instantly throughout the month, corporate accounting teams eliminate the traditional workload spikes associated with quarterly and annual closes.
Machine Learning in Audit Trails and Anomaly Detection
Advanced natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning tools are redefining internal audit and financial control environments. Automated systems analyze 100% of general ledger entries, identifying anomalous transactions, duplicate payments, and unauthorized journal entries in real time.
Rather than relying on random statistical sampling, corporate internal auditors can focus their attention on high-risk flags automatically surfaced by algorithmic monitoring platforms. This continuous risk assessment strengthens internal controls over financial reporting (ICFR) and significantly reduces fraud risk.
Evolving Roles for Accounting Professionals
As routine data entry and manual reconciliation tasks become fully automated, the skill set required for accounting professionals is shifting toward data analysis, system design, and strategic business advisory.
– Systems Governance: Accountants are increasingly responsible for monitoring algorithmic accuracy and managing data integration pipelines.
– Business Partnership: Finance professionals leverage real-time financial dashboards to advise operational leaders on margin management and working capital allocation.
– Regulatory Compliance Management: Accounting teams utilize automated platforms to ensure compliance with dynamic tax codes and international accounting standards.
Core Implementation Recommendations
1. Deploy Automated Reconciliation Tools: Integrate continuous transaction processing modules into existing enterprise ERP architectures.
2. Establish Algorithmic Governance Controls: Implement strict internal testing protocols to ensure automated accounting rules comply with GAAP/IFRS standards.
3. Reskill Accounting Teams: Invest in training finance staff on data analytics, workflow automation, and predictive financial modeling.
Corporate accounting departments face expanding reporting expectations as international sustainability disclosure standards achieve regulatory enforcement across major global jurisdictions. Chief Accounting Officers (CAOs) and corporate controllers are establishing rigorous internal accounting controls to treat Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) metrics with the same data precision, auditability, and governance as traditional financial statements.
Regulatory Harmonization Under Global Sustainability Frameworks
The implementation of standardized sustainability reporting frameworks—notably rules established by international sustainability accounting boards—has created unified expectations for public and large private enterprises. Corporations must report standardized metrics covering greenhouse gas emissions (Scope 1, 2, and material Scope 3), energy utilization, workforce demographics, and supply chain governance.
In Europe and other participating international jurisdictions, double materiality principles are mandatory. Under double materiality, organizations must report both how external sustainability risks impact corporate financial performance, and how internal corporate operations affect surrounding environmental and social structures.
Integrating Sustainability Metrics into Core ERP Systems
To provide auditable non-financial data, enterprise organizations are integrating specialized carbon accounting and ESG management platforms directly into core ERP systems. Automated data collectors capture energy utility invoices, logistics fuel consumption metrics, and vendor compliance records in real time.
Establishing automated, traceable data pipelines ensures that non-financial reporting is supported by clear audit trails. This structured approach allows external financial auditors to provide reasonable assurance on sustainability disclosures during annual corporate reporting cycles.
Financial Impacts and Capital Market Disclosure
Accurate ESG reporting directly influences corporate cost of capital and institutional credit ratings. Commercial lenders and institutional asset managers systematically incorporate sustainability metrics into risk pricing models. Companies that demonstrate transparent, verifiable progress in operational energy efficiency and climate risk mitigation benefit from expanded access to green bond markets and lower debt pricing.
Action Steps for Accounting Leadership
1. Implement Double Materiality Frameworks: Conduct comprehensive assessments to identify material financial and operational sustainability metrics.
2. Build Auditable Non-Financial Data Pipelines: Automate ESG data collection within core accounting software to ensure data integrity.
3. Align Sustainability with Annual Financial Filings: Prepare non-financial disclosures concurrently with financial statements to satisfy regulatory audit expectations.
Internal audit departments and corporate risk managers are modernizing internal control frameworks by shifting from periodic sampling techniques to continuous monitoring and machine learning analytics. As operational data volumes increase across enterprise organizations, automated control testing ensures financial integrity, prevents corporate fraud, and streamlines annual audit engagements.
The Limitation of Periodic Audit Sampling
Historically, internal and external auditors evaluated internal controls by reviewing random samples of financial transactions—often analyzing less than five percent of total ledger entries. In complex enterprise environments, periodic sampling methods carry inherent risks of overlooking localized financial misstatements, unauthorized disbursements, or operational control breakdowns.
In 2026, progressive internal audit functions are utilizing automated continuous monitoring platforms that evaluate one hundred percent of financial transactions in real time. Continuous control auditing systems continuously monitor general ledger entries, procurement approvals, and expense reimbursements across all operating subsidiaries.
AI-Powered Fraud Detection and Anomaly Identification
Machine learning models trained on historical corporate financial data excel at identifying subtle transactional anomalies that indicate potential fraud or operational error. Automated systems instantly flag duplicate invoice payments, unapproved vendor creation, unusual journal entry timing, and unauthorized override of authority thresholds.
When an anomaly is detected, the automated auditing platform generates an instant risk alert, allowing internal audit teams to investigate root causes immediately. Early detection prevents minor operational errors from escalating into material weaknesses in financial reporting.
Streamlining External Audit Preparation
Continuous internal control monitoring delivers significant benefits during annual external financial audits. External audit firms can review continuous audit logs and automated control testing documentation, reducing the time required for manual field testing.
This integrated approach lowers overall audit compliance fees, reduces administrative burdens on corporate accounting staff, and provides senior management and audit committees with real-time visibility into the organization’s overall risk profile.
Core Implementation Guidelines
1. Transition to 100% Data Testing: Replace legacy sampling methods with automated continuous audit monitoring systems.
2. Deploy Anomaly Detection Algorithms: Implement machine learning models to identify unauthorized transactions and operational control overrides.
3. Align Internal and External Audit Workflows: Coordinate continuous control testing protocols with external auditors to optimize annual compliance cycles.