Connect with us

Accounting

The case for Roth IRA conversions after the Secure Acts

Published

on

The days of the individual retirement account “stretch” are long gone. But the appeal of Roth conversions is enduring — especially under the current tax rates.

Expiring provisions of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act at the end of 2025 that mean lower taxes on the conversion, the fact that Roth IRAs carry no required minimum distributions and, of course, the duty-free withdrawals for the owner or their heirs add up to a compelling case, according to Sarah Brenner, the director of retirement education with consulting firm Ed Slott & Company. The first Secure Act was a “game-changer for IRAs and Roth IRAs” due to the new obligation for beneficiaries to empty the accounts within a decade of inheritance, and Secure 2.0 “made some changes around the edges,” she said in an interview.

The situation for traditional IRA owners is “kind of like ripping off a Band-Aid,” in which they should just “get the pain over with,” Brenner said, pointing out that clients often have a misconception that “you’ve got to do it all” even though “it’s not all-or-nothing” because they could simply do a partial conversion as well.

“The Secure Act changed the game, and it has definitely led to, I would say, an even stronger case for Roth conversions,” she added. “You work with the rules you have, and you have a 10-year rule.”

READ MORE: Final IRS rules to IRA beneficiaries: Get going on those RMDs already

After four straight years of pushing back the implementation of that rule, the IRS has indicated that it will be going into effect at the beginning of 2025. Next year was already going to turn into one of the most consequential for tax policy in recent decades because of the possible sunset of the lower tax brackets and many other parts of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act that will be high on the agenda for the next occupant of the White House and lawmakers in control of Congress.

Tax experts have been extolling the continued virtues of Roth conversions since passage of the first Secure Act in 2019.

“Though considerations around Roth IRA conversions have changed as a result of the Secure Act, Roth IRAs still offer advantages to account owners and beneficiaries,” certified public accountant and planner Joseph Doerrer wrote the following year in the Journal of Accountancy. “Roth IRAs are tax advantaged, and owners of Roth IRAs aren’t required to take RMDs. This can prove helpful in retirement, as it allows a larger amount of assets to remain in the account. Not having to take RMDs can also help account owners avoid creating unwanted taxable income, giving them more flexibility in retirement. Beneficiaries will enjoy a simpler tax situation, versus beneficiaries of traditional IRAs, due to the tax-free nature of their distributions from the account.”

The politics that led to more tax revenue flowing into federal coffers are now affecting personal financial decisions among advisors and their clients in the wake of the two Secure Acts, Sheryl Rowling, a CPA, planner and technology firm founder, wrote last year for Morningstar.

“Now is the time to do Roth conversion planning,” Rowling said. “By delaying retirement distributions, your clients can have additional years to convert IRA funds to Roth at lower tax rates. These changes all seem to encourage, even require, a greater emphasis on Roth rather than pretax retirement contributions. Although this means more money to the IRS as contributions (or conversions) are made, the opportunity to permanently exclude future growth (and previously taxed principal) from taxation, coupled with the elimination of RMDs, should be a big win for taxpayers in the long run.”

The Roth conversion offers a “huge advantage” over traditional accounts in that clients “never need to take RMDs from their Roth IRAs when they’re alive,” Brenner noted. For those inheriting Roth accounts, their “very compressed timeline” to empty the IRAs within a decade is arriving alongside distributions that won’t have an effect on their taxable income, she said.

“I could just let that Roth IRA sit there and grow for 10 years and then everything would be accessible to me tax- and penalty-free. This is the type of proactive planning that people can be doing. Right now, we have historically low tax rates. We don’t know how long that’s going to last,” Brenner said. “It’s a good time for people to be thinking about converting their taxable traditional IRAs.”

READ MORE: 5 ways to be a tax planning ‘rockstar’

For advisors and their clients, the decision comes down to a simple calculation that the “money is going to be taxed at some point,” she noted.

“You are going to have to pay a tax bill when you convert. No one likes paying taxes unless they absolutely have to,” Brenner said. “Somebody at some point is going to have to pay taxes, so it’s good to do it on your schedule.”

Continue Reading

Accounting

Global ESG Reporting Standards and Double Materiality Compliance

Published

on

Corporate accounting departments face expanding reporting expectations as international sustainability disclosure standards achieve regulatory enforcement across major global jurisdictions. Chief Accounting Officers (CAOs) and corporate controllers are establishing rigorous internal accounting controls to treat Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) metrics with the same data precision, auditability, and governance as traditional financial statements.

Regulatory Harmonization Under Global Sustainability Frameworks
The implementation of standardized sustainability reporting frameworks—notably rules established by international sustainability accounting boards—has created unified expectations for public and large private enterprises. Corporations must report standardized metrics covering greenhouse gas emissions (Scope 1, 2, and material Scope 3), energy utilization, workforce demographics, and supply chain governance.

In Europe and other participating international jurisdictions, double materiality principles are mandatory. Under double materiality, organizations must report both how external sustainability risks impact corporate financial performance, and how internal corporate operations affect surrounding environmental and social structures.

Integrating Sustainability Metrics into Core ERP Systems
To provide auditable non-financial data, enterprise organizations are integrating specialized carbon accounting and ESG management platforms directly into core ERP systems. Automated data collectors capture energy utility invoices, logistics fuel consumption metrics, and vendor compliance records in real time.

Establishing automated, traceable data pipelines ensures that non-financial reporting is supported by clear audit trails. This structured approach allows external financial auditors to provide reasonable assurance on sustainability disclosures during annual corporate reporting cycles.

Financial Impacts and Capital Market Disclosure
Accurate ESG reporting directly influences corporate cost of capital and institutional credit ratings. Commercial lenders and institutional asset managers systematically incorporate sustainability metrics into risk pricing models. Companies that demonstrate transparent, verifiable progress in operational energy efficiency and climate risk mitigation benefit from expanded access to green bond markets and lower debt pricing.

Action Steps for Accounting Leadership
1. Implement Double Materiality Frameworks: Conduct comprehensive assessments to identify material financial and operational sustainability metrics.
2. Build Auditable Non-Financial Data Pipelines: Automate ESG data collection within core accounting software to ensure data integrity.
3. Align Sustainability with Annual Financial Filings: Prepare non-financial disclosures concurrently with financial statements to satisfy regulatory audit expectations.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Modernizing Internal Controls: Machine Learning and Continuous Monitoring in Auditing

Published

on

Internal audit departments and corporate risk managers are modernizing internal control frameworks by shifting from periodic sampling techniques to continuous monitoring and machine learning analytics. As operational data volumes increase across enterprise organizations, automated control testing ensures financial integrity, prevents corporate fraud, and streamlines annual audit engagements.

The Limitation of Periodic Audit Sampling
Historically, internal and external auditors evaluated internal controls by reviewing random samples of financial transactions—often analyzing less than five percent of total ledger entries. In complex enterprise environments, periodic sampling methods carry inherent risks of overlooking localized financial misstatements, unauthorized disbursements, or operational control breakdowns.

In 2026, progressive internal audit functions are utilizing automated continuous monitoring platforms that evaluate one hundred percent of financial transactions in real time. Continuous control auditing systems continuously monitor general ledger entries, procurement approvals, and expense reimbursements across all operating subsidiaries.

AI-Powered Fraud Detection and Anomaly Identification
Machine learning models trained on historical corporate financial data excel at identifying subtle transactional anomalies that indicate potential fraud or operational error. Automated systems instantly flag duplicate invoice payments, unapproved vendor creation, unusual journal entry timing, and unauthorized override of authority thresholds.

When an anomaly is detected, the automated auditing platform generates an instant risk alert, allowing internal audit teams to investigate root causes immediately. Early detection prevents minor operational errors from escalating into material weaknesses in financial reporting.

Streamlining External Audit Preparation
Continuous internal control monitoring delivers significant benefits during annual external financial audits. External audit firms can review continuous audit logs and automated control testing documentation, reducing the time required for manual field testing.

This integrated approach lowers overall audit compliance fees, reduces administrative burdens on corporate accounting staff, and provides senior management and audit committees with real-time visibility into the organization’s overall risk profile.

Core Implementation Guidelines
1. Transition to 100% Data Testing: Replace legacy sampling methods with automated continuous audit monitoring systems.
2. Deploy Anomaly Detection Algorithms: Implement machine learning models to identify unauthorized transactions and operational control overrides.
3. Align Internal and External Audit Workflows: Coordinate continuous control testing protocols with external auditors to optimize annual compliance cycles.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Tax Compliance and Global Regulatory Harmonization in 2026

Published

on

Corporate tax accounting departments are navigating an era of unprecedented regulatory complexity as global tax harmonization frameworks take full effect alongside real-time digital tax reporting mandates. Tax directors and accounting teams are adopting cloud-based tax compliance automation tools to manage multi-jurisdictional tax liabilities and satisfy stringent reporting rules across international jurisdictions.

Implementation of Global Minimum Tax Provisions
The implementation of international tax reform agreements—notably the Pillar Two global minimum tax framework—has reshaped multinational corporate tax planning. Multinational enterprises with consolidated revenues exceeding established thresholds must ensure an effective tax rate of at least 15% across every jurisdiction in which they operate.

Accounting teams are implementing specialized tax calculation modules integrated directly into enterprise resource planning (ERP) platforms. These automated tools calculate effective tax rates per country, identify top-up tax liabilities, and generate standardized compliance documentation required by national tax authorities.

Real-Time Digital Invoicing and E-Reporting Mandates
Tax authorities across Europe, Latin America, and Asia-Pacific have enacted mandatory electronic invoicing (e-invoicing) and continuous transaction controls (CTC). Under these systems, corporate transaction data must be submitted electronically to government portals in real time at the point of sale or invoice issuance.

This shift toward continuous digital tax reporting eliminates traditional annual tax audits in favor of ongoing automated compliance monitoring. Accounting departments are upgrading invoicing software to ensure seamless XML data formatting, digital signature authentication, and real-time validation against tax authority databases.

Automation and Data Analytics in Corporate Tax Strategy
To keep pace with dynamic tax legislation, tax departments are transitioning from reactive compliance teams to proactive strategic advisors. Machine learning algorithms analyze corporate transactional data to identify tax credits, research and development (R&D) incentives, and cross-border transfer pricing adjustments.

By automating routine tax return filings and calculations, corporate tax directors can focus on long-term capital structuring, evaluating the tax implications of corporate mergers, and optimizing international supply chain networks.

Strategic Priorities for Tax Executives
1. ERP System Upgrades: Ensure enterprise software is capable of generating real-time, granular tax data required for global minimum tax compliance.
2. E-Invoicing Integration: Implement scalable e-invoicing platforms to satisfy regional continuous transaction control regulations.
3. Strategic Tax Analytics: Utilize predictive tax modeling tools to evaluate structural changes in corporate operations and cross-border trade.

Continue Reading

Trending