Connect with us

Accounting

The CPA exam: ‘Failing is part of the journey’

Published

on

Your heart pounds. Your breath gets shaky. Then your stomach drops.

That’s what it feels like to learn you’ve failed the Uniform CPA Exam, according to James Tom, a recent graduate of Hofstra University and now a staff tax accountant at a Big Four firm. 

“I was at first a little angry, and then it hit me, ‘Oh my god, I put three to four months of my life in this exam just to fail it.’ It’s just so disheartening,” Tom told Accounting Today. “But then the next thing you think of is, ‘How could I have done things differently?'”

With the pervasiveness of social media, especially professional networking platforms like LinkedIn, accountants who pass all four sections of the CPA exam on the first try are sure to let everyone know. But the far more common — and less discussed — experience is to fail a couple of sections, perhaps several times. 

Students, professors and industry professionals suggest taking a break before dusting off, picking back up where you left off, and using certain studying and test-taking strategies to get that passing score on the next try. 

business people

Rattana.R – stock.adobe.com

Normal to fail

“It’s normal to fail,” said Liz Burkhalter, who is a CPA and the director of the CPA pipeline at the AIPCA. “I didn’t even pass all four on my first try. So it’s normal, and I think normalizing that and knowing it’s a part of the journey is really important.”

The CPA exam has taken different forms over the decades. Now, it consists of three required core sections: auditing and attestation (AUD), financial accounting and reporting (FAR), and taxation and regulation (REG). Since the implementation of CPA Evolution exam model in January 2024, test-takers must now also choose one of three discipline sections: business analysis and reporting (BAR), information systems and controls (ISC), and tax compliance and planning (TCP).

Candidates need to score a 75 on a given section to pass. This is an important distinction: They need a 75, not a 75%. Exams are “a weighted combination of scaled scores from multiple-choice questions and task-based simulations,” according to the American Institute of CPAs. In other words, because of the weightings and the way the exam is scored, a candidate could theoretically get 75% of the questions correct and still fail the exam. In the same way, a candidate could theoretically get below 75% and still pass. 

Most state boards of accountancy give 30 months from the time you pass your first exam to pass the other three sections, with a few exceptions. The time to pass was recently increased from 18 months.

The statistics paint a clear picture. Since 2024, pass rates for the three core sections — AUD, FAR and REG — hovered around 46%, 41% and 62%, respectively. Meanwhile, pass rates for the three new discipline sections — BAR, ISC and TCP — were 41%, 63% and 76%, respectively. However, “it’ll probably take easily into 2026 before we really get a picture of the volumes and the associated pass rates,” according to Joe Maslott, the AICPA’s director of CPA exam content management.

But while the exam is difficult, it’s not impossible, Maslott said. “We know that thousands of candidates a year pass the CPA exam. It is very doable. What candidates struggle with is probably the breadth of content and adequately preparing.”

Even Anoop Mehta, a past chair of the AICPA, failed the exam numerous times. 

“I signed up for a CPA review class. I sat for the exam. And I didn’t pass,” Mehta said in his AICPA chair inaugural speech in May 2022. “I had set a goal to achieve my CPA designation, but after a few more unsuccessful attempts, I gave up. I was resigned to never achieving those elusive letters. But something changed in me several years later. On my 30th birthday, [my wife] Bina asked me if I was really satisfied with my career. It gave me a pause, because in truth, I wasn’t. This was a turning point for me. So, I gave the CPA exam one last shot. You know the rest of the story.”

Training for the marathon

Studying for the exam is like training to run a marathon, Tom said. “You need to train your brain slowly to be able to sit down and take a bunch of questions that are very difficult for four hours.”

While in school, Tom woke up between 5 and 6 a.m. every morning to study for two to three hours before his 9 a.m. class. He found that in order to maintain his schedule, he needed to cut out one of his hobbies.

“What sucks about studying is you have 24 hours in a day. You usually sleep for eight hours, you have 16 left, and you have what you normally do during those 16 hours a day. Now that you have to start studying, you have to somehow take out of that time what you used to do and put it into studying,” he said. “For me, I used to play a lot of volleyball. I used to play like eight hours a week. Those eight hours go straight to studying.”

Tom says the two hardest aspects of the exam are the sheer volume of information it covers, and learning how to study. 

“You can choose to memorize it, or you can choose to understand it,” he said. “I’ve seen a lot of people choose to memorize it and then do very well, but it’s a lot more taxing on them. They’re studying a lot harder.”

Will Mann, a graduate of Robert Morris University, spent between 120 and 150 hours studying. He took and passed BEC first — an old section before the implementation of CPA Evolution — and was on a time crunch to pass the remaining three sections without losing any credit for BEC before the June 30 deadline. While in school, he passed REG on the first try and passed AUD after three tries. It took four tries on FAR before he passed in June, after he graduated — and just before the deadline. 

“It’s frustrating, for sure,” he said. “[But] instead of being frustrated and complaining about it, take that energy and try to put it towards, ‘How am I going to pass and how am I going to pass quickly?'”

Trying again

Jack Castonguay, associate professor of accounting and chair at Hofstra University, says the first step after failing is to take a break. Castonguay is also the vice president of learning and development of accounting and finance at Surgent, another one of the leading exam prep providers. 

“Most students want to immediately jump back in, but normally by the time you take that exam you’ve been studying so hard for so long. You’re a little burnt out. You can only see the same information so many times,” he said. “From there, go back and start studying the section you just failed.”

Some candidates ask if they should try another section then come back to the one they failed later. But the issue with that, Castonguay said, is “You’re essentially taking all that knowledge you built up to, and you’re storing it away, hoping that’s going to be there as fresh as it was when you put it away.”

Castonguay’s additional advice should sound familiar to any student with good test-taking practices: If you don’t know the answer to a multiple choice question, flag it and come back later. “Don’t spin your wheels,” he said. 

Analog ways of studying should not be discredited either, he said. While many test prep resources are online and the exam itself is computerized, handwritten notes and flashcards are still some of the best tools for memorization.

Mann’s advice to test-takers was to review everything — not just what you think you don’t know: “There are so many nuances to all of these exams and it’s easy to think you know something. Maybe you could answer a multiple choice question on it, but if they give it to you in a simulation, that’s a whole different ball game. You have to apply that knowledge at a much deeper level.”

He also advises going into the exam with a plan: Know when you’re going to each exam, plan which one to take first and prioritizing based on any events you anticipate, like starting a new job. He also recommends talking to someone who’s taken the test before to understand exactly what it will be like walking into the room. 

Burkhalter emphasized the importance of adjusting study plans and habits as necessary, like moving to the library if there are too many distractions at home. 

“Being able to make adjustments proactively, instead of trying to do the same thing that led you down an undesirable path is going to be the key to not only your exam success, but success in life,” she said. 

She also noted that “not every single review course provider or each study resource is a one-size-fits all.” 

Roly Marrero, a staff accountant at fractional CFO services firm Staxx, utilized more unorthodox approaches to pass the exam. Marrero made posts to the Subreddit r/CPA on Reddit with clarifying questions and joined study groups on Discord, like Big Picture Accounting.

He also stressed the importance of giving yourself enough time: “No one’s passed the exam and said, ‘I could’ve done it in less time,’ or, ‘I had too much time.’ No, it’s always you take it and then you say, ‘I should have dedicated more time to this.'”

“You’re going to pass it sooner or later,” he concluded. 

Burkhalter echoed the sentiment: “The only time you actually fail is when you quit. Failing is part of the journey. You’re not failing until you actually stop testing.” 

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending