Connect with us

Accounting

The end of the penny could create a big compliance problem

Published

on

The U.S. penny may finally be on its way out. Producing each coin now costs the U.S. Mint about 3.7 cents, at a total taxpayer cost of more than $100 million per year. Ending production may make economic sense, but it will also have consequences for accountants, retailers and tax administrators who must adapt to a new reality of rounded transactions and potential compliance inconsistencies.

New York’s proposed “New Yorkers for Common Cents Act” provides an early look at what could come next. The bill would require merchants to round the final total of any cash transaction to the nearest five cents. Totals ending in one or two cents round down to the nearest nickel, while totals ending in three, four, five, six, seven, eight or nine cents round up. Electronic payments would remain unchanged.

pennies.jpg

At first glance, this appears to be a simple step to simplify payments. In practice, it raises new questions for sales tax calculation, recordkeeping and reconciliation. When rounding becomes part of every cash transaction, even small differences between cash and card totals can create confusion for customers and complications for accounting teams.

Where currency meets compliance

Under most rounding proposals, sales tax would still be calculated before rounding occurs. Tax rates, formulas and exemptions would not change, but cash totals could differ slightly from those of card or digital transactions. For retailers processing thousands of transactions each day, even small rounding differences can affect financial records, reporting and customer perception.

Other countries have already faced this issue. When Canada eliminated the penny in 2013, it directed businesses to calculate sales tax first and then apply rounding only to the final cash total. That approach helped keep tax math consistent and minimized disputes. The United States could benefit from following a similar model, but early proposals like New York’s do not yet address this level of detail.

Having two invoice totals for the same purchase, one for cash and one for digital payment, could create both customer service and consumer protection concerns. Legislators may be able to solve one of those issues but not both, which means retailers will need to develop new rounding procedures that are compliant and customer friendly.

The risk of fragmentation

The greater challenge is what happens if each state takes a different approach. The United States already has more than 13,000 sales and use tax jurisdictions, each with its own rules and reporting requirements, including different economic nexus thresholds. Adding inconsistent rounding practices on top of that complexity would make compliance more complex for multistate retailers.

A national rounding standard would make sense, but reaching agreement among states, local governments and Congress would not be easy. Without coordination, retailers could face an uneven patchwork of rounding rules that create confusion, audit risk and operational errors.

Why this matters to accountants and finance leaders

For accountants and auditors, the elimination of the penny is not a novelty. It is a change that will affect reconciliation, system configuration and compliance reporting. Accounting teams will need to ensure that rounding occurs only after tax calculation, and that records clearly show both pre- and post-rounding totals for audit transparency.

Technology providers will also need to adjust. Point-of-sale systems, ERP platforms and tax engines must include consistent rounding logic across all jurisdictions. Even small inconsistencies between systems could cause mismatched records, reconciliation delays or errors in tax filings.

While digital payments dominate, cash remains an important part of everyday transactions. The Federal Reserve’s 2024 consumer payment study found that 83% of Americans used cash at least once in the previous month and that 18% of all in-person transactions were cash-based. That means millions of purchases each day could soon be affected by new rounding requirements.

A call for coordination

Eliminating the penny may reduce waste, but it should not create inefficiency elsewhere. State revenue agencies, retailers and technology providers need to begin coordinating now to establish clear, consistent rounding standards. Businesses should start testing how different rounding models might affect pricing, accounting and sales tax reporting before the changes take effect.

If handled well, retiring the penny can be a smooth transition and even a chance to modernize compliance systems. If handled poorly, it risks adding unnecessary complexity to an already intricate sales tax environment.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending