Connect with us

Accounting

The individual side of the OBBBA tax bill

Published

on

A close up of the capital building with an American flag

The recently passed One Big Beautiful Bill Act added a sweeping array of provisions affecting individuals as well as businesses. 

Andrew Whitehair, director in the national tax practice of Top 10 Firm Baker Tilly, noted that one major area it’s making sure its clients understand is the many Tax Cuts and Jobs Act changes that have been made permanent. 

“We had been starting to prime a lot of our clients earlier this year and last year, in the absence of some new legislation, to expect there to be a sunset and a reversion back to the pre-TCJA tax rates and brackets,” he said. “We were warning some of our clients that they might want to engage in what I would call reverse tax planning, where you accelerate income into 2025 in anticipation of higher rates in 2026, and then defer deductions. But with the OBBBA that didn’t happen.”

“Instead, the TCJA rates have been preserved and extended, so for most of our clients we probably want to defer income and accelerate deductions,” he explained.

Whitehair noted that the SALT deduction was a big area of conversation and back-and-forth as the many iterations of the bill were being debated. 

“Ultimately, we got this temporary increase in the limit of state and local taxes that could be deducted, which went from $10,000 to $40,000. For a lot of clients, this is going to be a nice bonus, but it did come with a phaseout limitation,” he said. “There’s a lot of higher-net-worth clients that aren’t going to benefit from this. The cap phases down to the old $10,000 limit at $500,000 of adjusted gross income. The effect of the SALT phase-down is that the taxpayer will incur a federal tax rate of about 45% of that income.”

“So for clients that we have in that range, we’re talking to them about some other ways to manage their income,” he continued. “For example, we wouldn’t want to do a Roth conversion, which might put them in a punitive phase-down range. Or they could switch over from Roth 401(k) contributions to deductible pre-tax contributions.”

(Read more:Big wins for business in OBBBA“)

When the TCJA went into effect, a number of states responded by implementing pass-through entity regimes. 

“These would effectively allow the taxpayer to do an end run around the SALT cap,” Whitehair observed. “Although early versions of the OBBBA would either have limited PTE deductions for either everybody or for certain groups of people, that did not make it into the final bill. So for people that are business owners and participate in pass-through entities, these are still available and will be an important strategy for them in order to maximize their state and local tax deductions.”

The tax brackets are largely unchanged, Whitehair noted. 

“There were some minor changes at the 10% and 12% brackets, but those are not going to be significant in the grand scheme of things,” he said. There are some undecided issues regarding items such as no tax on overtime, no tax on tips, and Social Security. “There are a lot of areas where we’re going to need additional guidance from the Treasury to implement some of this.”

The TCJA eliminated the Pease limitation on itemized deductions, and the new bill makes this permanent, Whitehair noted.

“However, it replaced it with essentially a new Pease limitation,” he said. “One of the things we’ve been grappling with is that they removed the exception to the itemized deduction limitation. But the old Pease limitation never applied to estates and trusts; it just applied to individuals. We’re thinking that probably this new itemized deduction limitation is going to apply to estates and trusts as well. The way that it’s set up to work is that it’s only supposed to limit the deductions for individual taxpayers that are in the top 37% bracket. But if you’re a trust or an estate, the top 37% bracket kicks in at a very low threshold. So we believe that this is probably going to be a big issue for a lot of trusts come 2026 when this provision takes effect.” 

One of the issues Whitehair is discussing with charitably minded clients is accelerating contributions into 2025. “Part of that is this new itemized deduction limitation that applies to taxpayers in that top bracket. But there’s also a new charitable floor for itemized deductions related to charitable contributions. If you remember how the old medical expense deduction works, where you only get to take a deduction once your medical expenses are over a certain threshold, they took that concept and applied it to charitable contributions as well.”

“We’re still waiting on detailed guidance from the IRS on the OBBBA’s overtime tax provisions,” said Whitehair’s colleague Gillian Florentine, a director with Baker Tilly’s human resource consulting team. “In the meantime, employers should begin tracking ‘qualified’ overtime carefully. This means tracking overtime pay that is required under the FLSA and only the premium portion exceeding the employee’s regular rate. For example, if an employee earns $20 per hour and works 50 hours, only the additional $10 per hour premium for those extra 10 hours qualifies, not the full overtime pay.”

“It’s important to note that overtime paid beyond FLSA requirements, such as daily overtime premiums required by state laws or contracts, does not qualify for the deduction,” Florentine said. “Additionally, employers will need to report qualified overtime compensation separately on Form W-2, although the IRS has not yet issued updated forms or final reporting guidance. The act specifically applies to overtime worked over 40 hours in a workweek, as noted in the FSLA requirements. Employer policies on overtime may be more generous than the FLSA requires, but that won’t qualify for the tax benefit under OBBBA.”

(Read more:Caps, credits, contributions: Tax planning for parents under OBBBA.“)

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending