Connect with us

Accounting

The liability landscape for tax season

Published

on

Tax day concept. The USA tax due date marked on the calendar.

Natasa Adzic/stock.adobe.com

While the ebb and flow of risks facing the tax preparer varies from year to year, one factor remains relatively constant: Tax engagements generate the most frequent litigation among professional liability claims — although this litigation isn’t necessarily the most severe. This is due in part to the multiple dates, thresholds and differing rules at play over a wide swath of taxing jurisdictions.

H.R.1, or the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, is the biggest issue and opportunity for CPA firms this year, according to Deb Rood, a CPA and risk control and consulting director for CNA, the endorsed underwriter for the AICPA Professional Liability Insurance Program. “At CNA we’re a little more concerned about the issues than the opportunities,” she remarked.

Some of the most important issues facing preparers during the filing season ahead include the following, according to Rood:

  • Employee Retention Tax Credit claims submitted after Jan. 31, 2024 will be denied. If clients did not get their claims in before then, they may assert that the CPA firm should have told them to submit the claim earlier.
  • Some clients may say they should have been informed earlier with regard to expiring clean energy credits. Clients will assert that if they had known the credits were expiring, they would have bought that electric vehicle sooner or installed solar panels earlier to mitigate this risk. So tax pros and accountants might want to send a newsletter to clients now informing them about impending deadlines.
  • Missed opportunities. For the past several years, R&E expenses were required to be capitalized. Going forward, there are several opportunities to expense R&E more rapidly. In fact, some taxpayers can amend prior-year returns to immediately deduct R&E, or capitalized R&E in the current year. CPAs should inform affected clients of the options for doing so and document this in writing.
  • Similarly, there are many opportunities related to fixed assets that CPAs should inform their clients about. IRC Section 179 on bonus depreciation and other ways to deduct the cost more quickly are available. Accountants and tax pros should talk to clients about these opportunities and document those conversations. Hopefully, this opportunity for the client turns into an opportunity for the CPA.   
  • If a client asks their CPA to help analyze new tax provisions, whether they be related to R&E, fixed assets or anything else, the CPA firm should, of course, obtain a new engagement letter for this expanded service. Providing this advice is a new engagement, separate and apart from preparing the tax return.

Another development for tax pros to bear in mind is the executive order issued by President Trump on May 25, 2025, that required the U.S. government to not issue paper checks after Sept. 30, 2025, and to stop accepting paper checks as soon as practicable. This includes payments to and from the IRS, such as quarterly estimates and annual payments made with tax returns. 
CPA firms should notify clients of this change now, because if they don’t and the client misses a payment or pays late because a paper check is not accepted, the client may blame the CPA and ask the accountant to pay any assessed penalties and interest. 

Some CPAs anticipate taxpayers will ask for help in making payments — logging on to the IRS website, either EFTPS or IRS Direct Pay, entering the client’s bank account and patent details — especially those clients who tend to rely a little too much on the CPA. 

“We believe this is a terrible idea,” Rood warned. “So many things could go wrong and result in a malpractice claim: The client could have insufficient funds and blame the CPA firm for not providing them enough time to ensure the funds were there before the payment was drafted; the CPA firm could input the wrong payment amount, routing number or bank account number; the client may close the account, not inform the CPA firm and then blame the CPA firm for the payment not being timely made; and there will be more personally identifiable information retained by the firm, creating a bigger data security risk.”

While it may be more interesting for CPAs to focus on new tax legislation and executive orders, they can’t ignore the basics, according to Rood: “In 2024, less than 50% of the tax claims asserted against CPAs in the AICPA Professional Liability Insurance Program included an engagement letter,” she said. “Big and small firms alike — they all are missing engagement letters when a tax claim arises.”

A large percentage of tax claims include some debate about the scope of services, she noted, and without an engagement letter, these claims are very difficult to defend.

“Make a goal for the upcoming tax season to get all of those engagement letters,” she suggested. “I recommend leveraging technology to get the letters out, signed and returned. 

“We also have seen an increase in claims related to missed due dates,” she added. “In 2024, 39% of tax claims were for untimely filed or unfiled tax returns.”

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending