Connect with us

Accounting

The pros and cons of tax-free tips

Published

on

Both candidates for president have proposed making tips for services tax-free, meaning that it may be an idea whose time has come. Former President Donald Trump initially made the proposal, and soon after, Vice President Kamala Harris chimed in. The two candidates made their proposals in Nevada, which — in addition to being up for grabs electorally — has the highest percentage of service-related workers in its workforce of any state. 

“Not surprisingly, both Trump and Harris announced their proposals in a battleground state with an outsized hospitality and service industry with many tipped workers,” said tax attorney Marc Kushner of MAK Tax Law Group. 

Before the two candidates made their proposals, there had been a couple of bills floated in Congress. “Senator Ted Cruz proposed a bill to exempt tip income from income tax, and other bills would exempt tips from both income and payroll tax. But there is a real concern that, depending on how tips are defined, highly compensated employees may try to adjust their compensation to take advantage of it, and of course that’s not who the proposal is meant to benefit,” said Kushner.

Tipping -- tip money for a server

MARGARET JOHNSON/MargJohnsonVA – stock.adobe.com

“On its face, this proposal has a lot of appeal, and resonates with many people not just for its perceived fairness in terms of such workers being at the lower end of the income scale and the uncertainty and unsteadiness of such income for these workers,” he said. “It’s also a recognition of the inherent difficulty in tracking tips income — and, in particular, cash tips paid directly by customers, rather than employers, to tipped employees.”

While these proposals are touted as benefiting the millions of restaurant, hospitality, and other service workers whose compensation is comprised substantially of uncertain and unsteady tip income, the biggest beneficiaries of these proposals could largely be the employers of these workers, as well as nontipped, highly compensated employees and their employers, according to Kushner. 

“First, a sizable number of tipped workers do not earn sufficient income to be subject to income taxes under current tax law,” he observed. The cash tips received by tipped workers are generally and largely remitted directly by customers to the tipped workers without ever going through the employer’s hands nor ever being reported to the employer by the tipped workers. These cash tips are essentially already de facto ‘exempt’ from income and Social Security taxes.”

For those tipped workers who do in fact report their cash tips to their employers — together with their credit-card tips and other tips funneled through the employer — the employer would no longer have to withhold income and Social Security taxes, nor pay the employer Social Security taxes on such tips, and this tipped income would not be taken into account in determining Social Security eligibility for the tipped worker, Kushner remarked. 

“Moreover, whereas there has been a recent movement of some restaurant companies to adopt a fixed compensation model for their servers and eliminate tipping altogether, these proposals if enacted would likely place less emphasis on these efforts, as well as incentivize the hospitality and service industry to lobby Congress and state and municipal legislatures to curb efforts to increase minimum wages for tipped workers,” Kushner added.

“Perhaps most consequentially, depending on how circumscribed this proposal might be worded if enacted, it could incentivize nontipped, highly compensated and hugely creative employees and nonemployee personnel and their companies, funds, and other entities to try and restructure compensation to qualify as tax-exempt ‘tips’ income,” Kushner predicted. “For private equity, venture capital and hedge fund managers, general partners, this could prove to be an even bigger boon than the taxation of ‘carried interest’ income at the reduced long-term capital gains tax rate,” he concluded.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending