Bob Lewis (right) and Doug Lewis (left) of The Visionary Group at Evolve
If you don’t like the merger & acquisition landscape in accounting, wait a little while — it will change.
“It’s constantly changing, constantly evolving,” Doug Lewis, a managing director at M&A advisors The Visionary Group, told attendees of a session at the BDO Alliance’s 2025 Evolve Conference, being held in Las Vegas this week. “In just a couple of weeks there could be an entirely new option.”
From the multiple flavors of private equity deal and traditional M&A deals, to employee stock ownership plans and even initial public offerings, accounting firms have never had so many options to choose from — but that means firms have to make hugely consequential choices at a time when the rules are in constant flux.
“There are a lot of things happening out there in the marketplace — it’s not just PE,” he said, noting that of 22 deals his company worked on over the past year, nine involved PE, but 13 were more traditional accounting firm mergers. “There’s no one right path for a firm.”
While PE isn’t right for every firm, it has had an enormous impact on the market, driving up prices and creating inflated expectations, changing deal structures, accelerating the pace of deal-making, and much more, more or less completely upending the traditional world of accounting firm M&A.
With all that in mind Doug Lewis and Bob Lewis, the founder of The Visionary Group, shared a number of rules for success in accounting M&A — for both buyers and sellers.
Rules for the target market
The first step for every potential acquire is to decide if they want to be acquired. Many don’t – but that’s a choice that should be made after careful deliberation.
“If you do want to remain independent, stress-test your succession plan — and if you don’t have one, that’s where you need to start,” explained Bob Lewis.
Remaining independent is perfectly possible, but comes with its own struggles; firms that decide that a deal is a better bet for them should keep the following rules in mind:
1. Manageyour expectations. Stories of private equity firms paying exorbitant amounts of money have filled accounting firm partners’ heads with unrealistic ideas.
“Stop listening to the multiples from other deals,” said Bob Lewis. “It’s unique to each deal. Everyone says, ‘I want a multiple of 10 or 12 because I heard someone else got one.’ The only multiple you know for sure is CBIZ [because it’s a publicly traded stock]. The rest is all scuttlebutt from the rumor mill.”
The final multiple in any deal will involve so many different factors that no other firm’s multiple can be a useful guide.
2. Look for your hidden value. Acquiring firms are often looking for opportunities to quickly grow an acquired practice, so that what at first might seem deficiencies can actually be attractive.
“If you’re exploring selling or merging, knowing the hidden value of your firm is valuable,” said Doug Lewis, before laying out a number of these, including a lack of advisory services or a wealth management practice; having weak client pricing; not taking advantage of outsourcing; or coming from a less expensive area with lower-cost professionals.
3. Stick to the facts. The financial and operational data firms share should be accurate and honest. “Some firms try to get very creative with what their true value really is, only to find out that these large acquirers are really good at math,” said Doug Lewis. “More often than not, the BS will get sniffed out.”
4. Pay attention to the right stats. “Revenue per head is the benchmarking metric that most acquirers are looking at,” explained Doug Lewis. “$200,000 is a healthy level; we’ve seen as high as $500,000, but $200,000 and above and you’re doing OK.”
Other valuable metrics include revenue per equity partner, and realized dollar per hour.
5. Clean up your act. Both Lewises agreed that these characteristics would make firms less attractive as an acquisition target: a high volume of 1040s; high billable hours at the partner level; an unintegrated firm with an eat-what-you-kill approach; a lack of standardized processes; lots of very small clients; and not tracking hours. (The last item isn’t about billing, Bob Lewis said; it’s about not knowing how your firm operates.)
New rules for acquirers, too
It isn’t just PE firms that are going out to make deals; more and more accounting firms are adding M&A to their growth strategies. But they may find themselves losing out to their many competitors if they don’t pay attention to the following rules:
1. Move faster. Traditional accounting firm deals used to be able to unfold at a stately pace, but no longer. “Time kills all deals,” Doug Lewis warned. “There are some really bad acquirers out there who will drag a deal on for two, three or four years. There are phenomenal acquires who can do it in just a few months. The lack of speed kills deals.”
“If it takes you three months to get back to a target, what message do you think that sends to them?” asked Bob Lewis.
2. Bring cash. Private equity has accustomed firms to the idea that they’ll get cash right away — something that didn’t used to happen in traditional firm M&A, but is increasingly common now. “We’ve seen the cash component skyrocket in just the last three to six months,” said Doug Lewis. “We’re seeing much more cash in the deal. It’s rare to see less than 30% of cash, and we’re seeing as much as 50-60%.”
3. Don’t try to unbundle a firm. Telling a target firm that you’re only interested in one part of their practice won’t work. “You’ve got to buy the whole thing,” said Bob Lewis. “You can’t go in and try to buy 60% and leave them with the worst clients.”
4. Don’t start by being picky. With cultural and personal fit being so important, heavy scrutiny of the books can wait a bit. “Ripping apart the numbers of a firm before you even start to put a deal together is often the kiss of death,” said Doug Lewis, who added a story about a $20 million deal that was derailed in its second meeting when the would-be acquirer came in asking questions about a $6,000 discrepancy in the target’s financials.
5. Have a process. A surprising number of firms take a more or less ad hoc to M&A. “You have to run a process if you’re going to be competitive in this marketplace,” said Doug Lewis. “So many firms have pushed these down to people who’ve never done a deal in their lives.”
6. Have a single go-to guy. Like many things, M&A deals shouldn’t be run by committees. “Have one leader run point on all the meetings,” said Bob Lewis. “We’ve had calls with seven partners on the call, and they’ll start asking questions. And your lead needs M&A experience or some coaching.”
As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.
Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.
The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.
However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.
WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.
The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.
Untested Legal Mechanism
To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.
White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.
Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.
“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.
USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs
Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).
However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:
Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
Potash and critical minerals
Fish and seafood
Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)
Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.
Canadian Response and Market Reaction
Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.
Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.
Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.
With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.
The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.
The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.
Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.
However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.