Connect with us

Accounting

The tax complexity of NIL pay for NCAA athletes

Published

on

Financial advisors and tax professionals could help college athletes save a lot of money on their name, image and likeness pay — but only with better guidance, a new study found.

Outlining more than a half dozen possible trust and estate-planning strategies for a women’s basketball star named “Jane Doe,” the academic paper by Doron Narotzki of the University of Akron and Yariv Brauner of the University of Florida was published last month in the American University Business Law Review. Each strategy came with complicating factors. However, with the right planning for Doe’s $225,000 in annual earnings at “XYZ University,” her tax liability could be reduced by as much as $32,816, according to their estimates. 

Four years ago, the National Collegiate Athletic Association legalized (NIL) payments to college student-athletes for endorsements, social media campaigns, video games and the other growing sources of potential compensation. But experts say the talented youngsters, who can net millions of dollars a year, still need much more guidance about how to avoid scams and costly tax bills

“College athletes face significant challenges in navigating the complex tax landscape,” Narotzki and Brauner wrote. “The shift from being a student-athlete to a taxable entity requires a steep learning curve in financial literacy and tax compliance. Many athletes may lack the necessary resources or guidance to manage these responsibilities effectively. The NCAA should recognize this dramatic change and consider altering its fiduciary duty, or that of the universities, toward student-athletes by providing them with legal and tax consultation. This support could include workshops on financial literacy, access to professional advisors, and tailored resources to help athletes understand and fulfill their tax obligations. By taking these steps, the NCAA and universities can better support student-athletes in managing their new financial realities and responsibilities.”

READ MORE: Big NIL deals bring cash — and alarms about financial literacy

The need for education

Financial advisors frequently covet athletes and entertainers as clients, but those customers often must overcome errors tied to their wealth before they begin tapping into tax savings methods on the level of, say, Shohei Ohtani’s 2023 deal with the Los Angeles Dodgers

NIL money poses a lot of the same challenges with sudden wealth that can come up with early career doctors, according to Palash Islam, the founder of San Ramon, California-based Synergy Financial Group and a onetime front-office employee with the National Basketball Association franchise then called the Seattle SuperSonics. In addition, his daughter is following in his footsteps as a student manager with the men’s basketball team at his alma mater, the University of Washington Huskies. 

Islam’s practice works with many professional athletes.

“I don’t even mess with players on their first contracts because there will be so many mistakes that will be made that it’s not worth it. You get them on the second,” he said. “It’s just challenging when you’re 21, 22 to be able to manage your money and to make it last.”

The athletes often struggle to look past the question of the size of their NIL pay, to the detriment of other aspects including long-term tax and planning implications, and athletic programs can find “only so many hours of practice” or NCAA-regulated meeting times to devote to financial literacy, according to Pat Brown. A former all-conference linebacker with the University of Kansas Jayhawks, Brown is now a 23-year veteran wealth manager with Creative Planning at the firm’s Will & Trust Center and the founder of an organization called Financial Literacy For Student Athletes. He provides financial coaching and education to teams at KU and more than a dozen other universities.

“Having these conversations with them, I know it’s falling on deaf ears, because, ‘I just want to play ball, I just want to get paid.’ At a certain point I’m not able to be in front of them enough to get them to realize how important it is,” Brown said. “Now it’s upon these kids to take time out of their schedule to either sit down with someone like me or sit down with any financial professional. Some of these guys are making quite a bit of money.”

Under NCAA rules, the athletes must inform their colleges of their NIL deals and perform “legitimate services” in exchange for the money, and they’re allowed to hire professional advisors, agents or marketing representatives, according to Narotzki and Brauner. Schools can and do offer the athletes resources and education, but the colleges are not permitted to seek or negotiate NIL deals for the athletes. Firms like Merrill and Morgan Stanley are investing resources aimed at finding potential clients, and financial technology companies are expanding their tools for NIL planning. However, the tax implications pose a lot of complexity.

“The era of name, image and likeness agreements has catapulted collegiate sports into a new dimension, offering student-athletes opportunities to profit from their personal brands,” former University of Miami Hurricanes basketball player Justin Heller, the founder of Heller Private Wealth, wrote in a piece for Financial Planning last year. “Yet, this financial windfall comes with a hidden peril: an array of tax obligations threatening to entangle unprepared student-athletes in potentially daunting tax situations that many are ill-equipped to handle.”

READ MORE: Giving student-athletes a running start through financial literacy

Case study and policy recommendations

That’s why there is “a critical need for educational programs and resources to help student-athletes understand their tax obligations,” and universities, boosters and financial advisors “should collaborate to provide comprehensive tax education and support” in a manner comparable to programs developed through the National Football League Players’ Association, according to Narotzki and Brauner. They could also use some practical advice on the rules specific to NIL pay from the IRS, they wrote.

“While the IRS has provided some general guidelines on self-employment and freelance income, specific guidance on NIL earnings remains limited,” Narotzki and Brauner wrote. “This ambiguity can lead to confusion and unintentional non-compliance among student-athletes, who are already at a built-in disadvantage and are more vulnerable and susceptible to finding themselves in non-compliance with the law.”

As part of their analysis of the key tax questions tied to NIL pay and their study of Jane Doe’s situation, they delved into seven different self-employed business owner classification strategies for her compensation. 

A sole proprietorship or a revocable trust came with the biggest tax liability at $75,056, followed by an S-corporation with an irrevocable trust that retained all her earnings ($68,393.50), an irrevocable trust that retained the income ($67,693.50), an S-corporation that distributed part of the earnings to another beneficiary ($57,940), an S-corporation with a revocable trust ($56,100) and, at the lowest end of the spectrum, an irrevocable trust with distributed income ($42,240). Besides the estimates of the federal, state or local and payroll taxes, each strategy brings added costs for hiring professionals to help file returns or create those entities, the requirement for careful recordkeeping of all earnings and expenses and a far-reaching search for any possible deductions or credits, Narotzki and Brauner wrote.

“Both sole proprietor and revocable trust calculations result in the same tax liability since the income is taxed to Jane,” they wrote. For the irrevocable trust, distributing income to beneficiaries results in the lowest tax liability. The S-corporation provides significant tax savings compared to a sole proprietorship. The S-corporation with an irrevocable trust can offer additional tax savings if dividends are distributed to beneficiaries in a lower tax bracket but may result in higher taxes if income is retained in the trust. Using an S-corporation alone provides substantial tax savings compared to a sole proprietorship, whereas adding an irrevocable trust to the S-corporation structure can result in further tax savings if dividends are distributed to beneficiaries with lower tax rates.”

READ MORE: Free NIL Long Game course teaches NCAA athletes financial literacy

The outlook for NIL and taxes

Only a “few and far between” colleges have developed resources to explain the potential of such sophisticated planning strategies for athletes, according to Brown.

“I just would hope that more kids are looking for this exposure, especially the kids who realize that they can make some life-changing money. Not everyone is going to go to the league,” Brown said. “As young as they are, it’s going to compound, and time is on their side. … If they don’t understand taxes or how to mitigate tax as much as possible, then that can definitely be harmful as well.”

In order to guide the student-athletes through the implications of their legalized earnings, the IRS should ramp up its guidance on the regulations for NIL earnings, the universities ought to give them tax education as part of their athletic program and the NCAA must create a standard level of tools for planning and compliance, Narotzki and Brauner wrote.  

“Understanding the tax implications of NIL earnings is crucial for college athletes like Jane to maximize their financial opportunities and comply with tax laws,” they wrote. “This case study highlights the complexity of tax responsibilities and the need for better education and resources. By addressing these challenges, we can ensure that athletes are well-prepared to manage their NIL income effectively.”

Continue Reading

Accounting

Accounting firms seeing increased profits

Published

on

Accounting firms are reporting bigger profits and more clients, according to a new report.

The report, released Monday by Xero, found that nearly three-quarters (73%) of firms reported increased profits over the past year and 56% added new clients thanks to operational efficiency and expanded service offerings.

Some 85% of firms now offer client advisory services, a big spike from 41% in 2023, indicating a strategic shift toward delivering forward-looking financial guidance that clients increasingly expect.

AI adoption is also reshaping the profession, with 80% of firms confident it will positively affect their practice. Currently, the most common use cases for AI include: delivering faster and more responsive client services (33%), enhancing accuracy by reducing bookkeeping and accounting errors (33%), and streamlining workflows through the automation of routine tasks (32%).

“The widespread adoption of AI has been a turning point for the accounting profession, giving accountants an opportunity to scale their impact and take on a more strategic advisory role,” said Ben Richmond, managing director, North America, at Xero, in a statement. “The real value lies not just in working more efficiently, but working smarter, freeing up time to elevate the human element of the profession and in turn, strengthen client relationships.”

Some of the main challenges faced by firms include economic uncertainty (38%), mastering AI (36%) and rising client expectations for strategic advice (35%). 

While 85% of firms have embraced cloud platforms, a sizable number still lag behind, missing out on benefits such as easier data access from anywhere (40%) and enhanced security (36%).

Continue Reading

Accounting

Private equity is investing in accounting: What does that mean for the future of the business?

Published

on

Private equity firms have bought five of the top 26 accounting firms in the past three years as they mount a concerted strategy to reshape the industry. 

The trend should not come as a surprise. It’s one we’ve seen play out in several industries from health care to insurance, where a combination of low-risk, recurring revenue, scalability and an aging population of owners create a target-rich environment. For small to midsized accounting firms, the trend is exacerbated by a technological revolution that’s truly transforming the way accounting work is done, and a growing talent crisis that is threatening tried-and-true business models.

How will this type of consolidation affect the accounting business, and what do firms and their clients need to be on the lookout for as the marketplace evolves?

Assessing the opportunity… and the risk

First and foremost, accounting firm owners need to be aware of just how desirable they are right now. While there has been some buzz in the industry about the growing presence of private equity firms, most of the activity to date has focused on larger, privately held firms. In fact, when we recently asked tax professionals about their exposure to private equity funding in our 2025 State of Tax Professionals Report, we found that just 5% of firms have actually inked a deal and only 11% said they are planning to look, or are currently looking, for a deal with a private equity firm. Another 8% said they are open to discussion. On the one hand, that’s almost a quarter of firms feeling open to private equity investments in some way. But the lion’s share of respondents —  87% — said they were not interested.

Recent private equity deal volume suggests that the holdouts might change their minds when they have a real offer on the table. According to S&P Global, private equity and venture capital-backed deal value in the accounting, auditing and taxation services sector reached more than $6.3 billion in 2024, the highest level since 2015, and the trend shows no signs of slowing. Firm owners would be wise to start watching this trend to see how it might affect their businesses — whether they are interested in selling or not.

Focus on tech and efficiencies of scale

The reason this trend is so important to everyone in the industry right now is that the private equity firms entering this space are not trying to become accountants. They are looking for profitable exits. And they will do that by seizing on a critical inflection point in the industry that’s making it possible to scale accounting firms more rapidly than ever before by leveraging technology to deliver a much wider range of services at a much lower cost. So, whether your firm is interested in partnering with private equity or dead set on going it alone, the hyperscaling that’s happening throughout the industry will affect you one way or another.

Private equity thrives in fragmented businesses where the ability to roll up companies with complementary skill sets and specialized services creates an outsized growth opportunity. Andrew Dodson, managing partner at Parthenon Capital, recently commented after his firm took a stake in the tax and advisory firm Cherry Bekaert, “We think that for firms to thrive, they need to make investments in people and technology, and, obviously, regulatory adherence, to really differentiate themselves in the market. And that’s going to require scale and capital to do it. That’s what gets us excited.”

Over time, this could reshape the industry’s market dynamics by creating the accounting firm equivalent of the Traveling Wilburys — supergroups capable of delivering a wide range of specialized services that smaller, more narrowly focused firms could never previously deliver. It could also put downward pressure on pricing as these larger, platform-style firms start finding economies of scale to deliver services more cost-effectively.

The technology factor

The great equalizer in all of this is technology. Consistently, when I speak to tax professionals actively working in the market today, their top priorities are increased efficiency, growth and talent. Firms recognize they need to streamline workflows and processes through more effective use of technology, and they are investing heavily in AI, automation and data analytics capabilities to do that. Private equity firms, of course, are also investing in tech as they assemble their tax and accounting dream teams, in many cases raising the bar for the industry.

The question is: Can independent firms leverage technology fast enough to keep up with their deep-pocketed competition?

Many firms believe they can, with some even going so far as to publicly declare their independence.  Regardless of the path small to midsized firms take to get there, technology-enabled growth is going to play a key role in the future of the industry. Market dynamics that have been unfolding for the last decade have been accelerated with the introduction of serious investors, and everyone in the industry — large and small — is going to need to up their games to stay competitive.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Trump tax bill would help the richest, hurt the poorest, CBO says

Published

on

The House-passed version of President Donald Trump’s massive tax and spending bill would deliver a financial blow to the poorest Americans but be a boon for higher-income households, according to a new analysis from the Congressional Budget Office.

The bottom 10% of households would lose an average of about $1,600 in resources per year, amounting to a 3.9% cut in their income, according to the analysis released Thursday. Those decreases are largely attributable to cuts in the Medicaid health insurance program and food aid through the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.

Households in the highest 10% of incomes would see an average $12,000 boost in resources, amounting to a 2.3% increase in their incomes. Those increases are mainly attributable to reductions in taxes owed, according to the report from the nonpartisan CBO.

Households in the middle of the income distribution would see an increase in resources of $500 to $1,000, or between 0.5% and 0.8% of their income. 

The projections are based on the version of the tax legislation that House Republicans passed last month, which includes much of Trump’s economic agenda. The bill would extend tax cuts passed under Trump in 2017 otherwise due to expire at the end of the year and create several new tax breaks. It also imposes new changes to the Medicaid and SNAP programs in an effort to cut spending.

Overall, the legislation would add $2.4 trillion to US deficits over the next 10 years, not accounting for dynamic effects, the CBO previously forecast.

The Senate is considering changes to the legislation including efforts by some Republican senators to scale back cuts to Medicaid.

The projected loss of safety-net resources for low-income families come against the backdrop of higher tariffs, which economists have warned would also disproportionately impact lower-income families. While recent inflation data has shown limited impact from the import duties so far, low-income families tend to spend a larger portion of their income on necessities, such as food, so price increases hit them harder.

The House-passed bill requires that able-bodied individuals without dependents document at least 80 hours of “community engagement” a month, including working a job or participating in an educational program to qualify for Medicaid. It also includes increased costs for health care for enrollees, among other provisions.

More older adults also would have to prove they are working to continue to receive SNAP benefits, also known as food stamps. The legislation helps pay for tax cuts by raising the age for which able bodied adults must work to receive benefits to 64, up from 54. Under the current law, some parents with dependent children under age 18 are exempt from work requirements, but the bill lowers the age for the exemption for dependent children to 7 years old. 

The legislation also shifts a portion of the cost for federal food aid onto state governments.

CBO previously estimated that the expanded work requirements on SNAP would reduce participation in the program by roughly 3.2 million people, and more could lose or face a reduction in benefits due to other changes to the program. A separate analysis from the organization found that 7.8 million people would lose health insurance because of the changes to Medicaid.

Continue Reading

Trending