Connect with us

Accounting

Tax Strategy: The IRS and the new Trump administration

Published

on

It is not surprising that a new Republican administration in the White House would create issues for the Internal Revenue Service. Past Republican administrations tended to starve the IRS for funds, resulting in a decline in audit activity and customer service. 

The new administration will have a new Treasury secretary and a new IRS commissioner. New executive orders have already had an impact on the IRS. The last Trump administration placed limits on new federal regulations, and the IRS has been active since the November election in promulgating new regulations. The new Treasury Secretary, Scott Bessent, has indicated that his top priority is extension of the expiring provisions of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, many of which expire at the end of 2025.

Executive orders

One executive order of the new administration has placed a freeze on almost all federal hiring. For most federal departments, the freeze only lasts long enough for the departments to prepare plans justifying additional hiring. For the IRS, however, not only the Treasury secretary but also Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency are required to approve any resumption in IRS hiring. The agency has been forced to revoke hiring offers to new graduates and others. Legislation has already reduced the $80 billion in funding the IRS received under the Inflation Reduction Act by $40 billion. 

An executive order also directed withdrawal of any U.S. support for the Organization of Economic Development’s Pillar One and Pillar Two initiatives on international taxation to address base erosion and profit-shifting and a minimum corporate tax. The primary concern of the administration is that countries might be able to tax a multinational corporation doing business in the country if it was not paying at least a minimum corporate tax.

The executive order on Schedule F reclassification of federal workers, if upheld in the courts, could expose more IRS employees to termination by removing their protected status as Civil Service employees.

Scott Bessent, founder and CEO of Key Square Group LP and Treasury Secretary nominee, during a Senate Finance Committee confirmation hearing
Scott Bessent during a Senate Finance Committee confirmation hearing

Kent Nishimura/Bloomberg

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act

Republicans in Congress are still working on how to approach extension of the expiring provisions of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. The House is focused on one budget reconciliation bill that would address both border and tax issues, while the Senate would prefer two reconciliation bills, with the tax bill coming later in the year. 

There is also some debate about whether extending existing provisions of the Tax Code requires revenue offsets in the legislation. Some Republicans are concerned about adding too much to the federal deficit, and the Republicans need to hold almost all Republican votes together to pass a budget reconciliation bill with a simple majority in both chambers of Congress. The narrow majorities might also force Congress to raise the $10,000 limit on the state and local tax deduction to gain the support of Republicans from New York and other high tax states. 

There are also a few business provisions in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act that started phasing down a few years ago: the expensing of bonus depreciation, the limitation on the business interest deduction, and the research and experimentation expense deduction. Efforts to renew those through last year had proposed retroactivity back to the start of the phase-downs. If those are still retroactive in the tax legislation this year, the changes could retroactively impact 2024 tax returns as well as earlier returns.

IRS regulations

As is common at the end of the year, the IRS released a lot of regulations at the end of the 2024, but also in January before President Trump was sworn in. The first Trump administration had placed restrictions on issuing new federal regulations. Some of the regulatory effort may have been a guard against further regulatory restrictions. IRS regulations are somewhat usual in that regard since taxpayers are often hoping for the issuance of new regulations to provide guidance on ambiguous provisions of tax law, while many other federal regulations may be viewed as a burden to business.

Many of the recently promulgated regulations relate to the clean energy provisions of the Inflation Reduction Act. At the end of 2024 and beginning of 2025, final regulations were issued on:

  • The definition of “energy project” for purposes of the Energy Investment Credit; 
  • The Clean Hydrogen Production Credit and Energy Property Election; 
  • The Clean Electricity Production and Clean Electricity Investment Credits; and,
  • The allocation of the low-income community bonus credit for the Code Sec. 48E Clean Energy Investment Credit.

Plus, proposed regulations were issued on the emission rules for the Code Sec. 45Z Clean Fuel Production Credit, and on the Code Sec. 45W Commercial Clean Vehicle Credit. 
The authorization in the Inflation Reduction Act of a study on direct filing of tax returns with the IRS has resulted for 2024 in a Direct File trial program involving 25 states. Republicans seem generally opposed to the Direct File program, although Secretary Bessent has said that it is safe at least for the current filing season.

President Trump has discussed eliminating many of these clean energy credits, especially those related to electric vehicles, although Republicans in some states that benefit from certain of the credits may push for their survival.

Recent regulations in the crypto area include final regulations on digital asset reporting by front-end brokers and final and proposed regulations on digital content and closed transactions. President Trump has also expressed support for the crypto industry, although it is not clear how he views these reporting requirements.

Other recent regulations include:

  • Proposed regulations on the Previously Taxed Earnings Credit and basis adjustments; 
  • Final regulations on retirement of tax-exempt bonds; 
  • Final regulations on supervisory approval of penalties; 
  • Final regulations on partnership basis-shifting transactions as reportable transactions; 
  • Final regulations on certain disregarded payments and dual consolidated losses; 
  • Final regulations on the resolution of federal tax controversies;
  • Proposed regulations implementing catch-up contribution changes; 
  • Proposed regulations on the executive compensation deduction limit; 
  • Proposed regulations on corporate separation, incorporation and reorganization matters; and,
  • Final regulations on micro-captive transactions and transactions of interest.

Other issues

Congressional legislation has authorized the expansion of Form 1099-K reporting by third-party payment providers of transactions more than $600. The IRS has been delaying implementation of this requirement, and, for 2024, is only requiring reporting of transactions involving more than $5,000 ($2,500 in 2025 and $600 in 2026). Some Republicans have proposed restoring the old $20,000-and-200-transactions limit, or at least keeping it from falling to $600.

President Trump has suggested setting up a separate External Revenue Service to deal with tariff issues.

Summary

The generous funding that the IRS has enjoyed for the last few years seems likely to be coming to an end, perhaps along with improvements in customer service, audits and collections, and system upgrades. 

The current tax filing season should be relatively normal; however, the future beyond that is hard to predict. It is likely that significant tax legislation will pass this year; however, with the thin Republican majorities and deficit concerns, the scope of that legislation and possible revenue raisers are also hard to predict. Tariffs may not count as revenue raisers; however, their presence may make some Republicans more comfortable with adding to the deficit in extending Tax Cuts and Jobs Act provisions.

Continue Reading

Accounting

FASB Standardizes Carbon Offsets Accounting Rules

Published

on

FASB Standardizes Carbon Offsets Accounting Rules

In a decisive move toward standardized environmental financial reporting, accounting standards boards issued updated implementation guidance during the week ending July 25, 2026, regarding the formal recognition and valuation of corporate carbon offsets and environmental credits. The revised frameworks establish precise rules for how enterprises must measure, record, and disclose carbon credits on balance sheets, eliminating years of inconsistent reporting practices across public capital markets.

Under the finalized accounting standard, purchased carbon offsets can no longer be categorized under vague administrative expenses or unstandardized intangible asset accounts. Instead, organizations must classify environmental credits based on underlying operational intent—distinguishing between credits held for immediate compliance compliance obligations, long-term offset obligations, or active market trading. Furthermore, companies are required to evaluate carbon holdings for fair value impairment at the end of each reporting period, ensuring that depreciated or low-quality environmental credits do not distort corporate asset values.

The standardized rules carry significant implications for corporate audit committees and chief accounting officers. External audit firms are implementing rigorous verification protocols to validate the physical legitimacy, legal ownership, and scientific permanence of carbon credits claimed on balance sheets. Inaccurate or overstated carbon accounting claims now carry substantial financial litigation risk, alongside potential regulatory enforcement for misleading ESG disclosures.

To remain fully compliant, corporate accounting departments must establish centralized carbon tracking systems integrated into primary standard ERP ledgers. Accounting teams that proactively adopt standardized environmental reporting protocols will build investor credibility, streamline annual audit processes, and insulate their organizations against evolving regulatory scrutiny.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Tax Compliance Tools Reduce Risk

Published

on

Automated Tax Compliance Tools Reduce Risk

Corporate tax departments reached a critical juncture in automated operational management. With nations worldwide rapidly enacting digital service taxes, localized value-added tax (VAT) mandates, and real-time electronic invoicing requirements, manual tax calculations have become obsolete. Modern corporate tax divisions are aggressively deploying AI-driven tax engine software to automate complex cross-border indirect tax calculations in real time.

The imperative for automated tax compliance stems from the sheer complexity of current trade policies and multi-jurisdictional commerce. E-commerce platforms, software vendors, and global manufacturers face constantly changing regional tax rates, statutory exemption rules, and cross-border tariff structures. Automated tax engines embed directly into enterprise enterprise resource planning (ERP) architectures, automatically applying correct tax codes at the point of sale, calculating real-time withholding amounts, and generating compliant e-invoices.

Automated audit trail generation represents another key advantage of modern tax tech integration. Advanced compliance platforms log every transactional tax determination on immutable digital ledgers, providing tax authorities with transparent, self-verifying audit trails. This capability drastically reduces the operational duration and administrative cost of corporate tax audits, protecting enterprises against severe penalties resulting from calculation errors or missed reporting deadlines.

For chief financial officers and tax directors, investing in automated tax compliance is a vital operational risk mitigation strategy. Automating routine tax calculations frees high-level accounting professionals to focus on strategic tax planning, transfer pricing optimization, and risk management in an increasingly complex global economic environment.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Trending