Connect with us

Personal Finance

This 79-year-old lost home to California wildfires, hopes to rebuild

Published

on

Remains of Karen Bagnard’s Altadena, California, house after it burned in the January 2025 Los Angeles-area wildfires.

Courtesy: Chelsea

On the night of Jan. 7, Karen Bagnard sat in her Altadena, California, house in the dark.

Forceful winds had caused her home to lose power, and she also had no running water, save for one bathroom.

“My daughter called and said, ‘Mom, do you realize there’s a fire?'” said Bagnard, who is 79 years old and legally blind. “I had no idea there was a fire.”

At that point, the evacuation zone for the Eaton Fire was far enough away for her to feel safe.

“I thought, ‘Oh, they’ll never get to my house,'” Bagnard said.

More from Personal Finance:
 How climate change is reshaping home insurance costs
 California wildfire victims may receive a one-time $770 payment
 Top-rated charities active in Los Angeles fire relief efforts

About 30 minutes later, her daughter Chelsea Bagnard called back. With the fire spreading quickly, Bagnard’s home was now near the border of the evacuation zone.

After Bagnard’s grandson, Dalton Sargent, who is 32 and also lives in her home, came back from work, the two decided to leave for the night.

In the more than 50 years she lived in the house, Bagnard had been close to evacuating before but had never actually left.

“I thought, ‘Okay, we’ll evacuate this time, but we’ll be back,'” she said.

That was the last time she stepped foot in her home.

The next day, Bagnard’s daughter and grandson returned to the neighborhood to check on the home before authorities sealed off the area. What they found was a “smoldering pile of debris,” her daughter wrote on Facebook, with only larger appliances such as the refrigerator and stove recognizable.

It was Jan. 22 before Bagnard was able to return to her neighborhood to see the devastation for herself.

“They brought a chair for me, and I sat in the driveway, and what I could see was just the land,” Bagnard said of the surreal scene. “I started looking at it in terms of, ‘How would we rebuild?'”

Karen Bagnard, 79, sits in the ruins of her Altadena, California, home, after it burned in the Los Angeles-area wildfires of January 2025. “I hope to live long enough to see it rebuilt,” she said.

Courtesy: Chelsea Bagnard

Older adults especially vulnerable to natural disasters

The Los Angeles-area wildfires destroyed tens of thousands of acres, ruining homes and entire neighborhoods. Insured losses could climb to $50 billion, according to estimates from JP Morgan.

Additionally, an unknown number of residents have been left homeless.

For older individuals, the catastrophe comes at a vulnerable time in their lives, when relocating and coping with physically difficult conditions can be more challenging.

By 2034, we’ll have more people over 65 than under 18 in our country, according to Danielle Arigoni, an urban planning and community resilience expert and author of the book “Climate Resilience for an Aging Nation.”

Yet those demographics are not used as a lens for climate resilience planning in most cases, she said.

“In two decades, we have not seen any improvement in the fatality rate of older adults in these kinds of disasters,” Arigoni said. “When you see that kind of trend line, to me that just screams for a different approach.”

The LA-area wildfires forced some assisted living facilities to evacuate, and some burned down, according to Joyce Robertson, CEO and executive director of Foundation for Senior Services.

In the aftermath of the fire, the public charity is focusing on providing supplies, including wheelchairs, and is working with nursing and assisted living facilities to help fill gaps for services and resources.

“You can imagine the stress for all those seniors having to evacuate,” Robertson said.

For older individuals who live on their own, the risk is that they will not be able to leave their homes, said Carolyn Ross, co-executive director of the Village Movement California, a coalition of 50 neighborhood-based community organizations that provide community programming and expertise to help older residents age in place.

“In natural disasters, they are disproportionately affected, more likely to be the ones found in their homes because they couldn’t evacuate,” Ross said.

Redfin CEO Glenn Kelman on LA fires: Rebuilding these homes will take a long time

The hardest hit of the Village Movement’s communities — Pasadena Village — had around 60 members displaced by the fires, and 19 lost their homes entirely, including Bagnard.

“It’s been heartbreaking,” said Katie Brandon, executive director at Pasadena Village.

“But it’s also been really beautiful to see the older adults really support each other, be there for each other, and see the communities of support that they’ve built over the last months and years really work for them,” Brandon said.

As Bagnard searched for a new residence, one of the Pasadena Village members stepped up to offer her a six-month temporary lease to live with her in her home, though the two women had not previously met.

Bagnard has been a valued member of the Pasadena Village for many years, according to Brandon, having hosted many events and programs at her “beautiful house, outside on her patio.”

As Bagnard regroups, the Pasadena Village is replacing the computer she lost with the accessibility features she needs due to her vision loss. The community organization is working with other affected area residents to help provide the equipment they need, such as air purifiers and computer printers. Where possible, it’s also encouraging older residents to continue to gather socially.

“The insurance companies seem to be pretty good at reacting and seeing what they can replace, but sometimes it’s quite a process,” Brandon said. “The sooner we can get our older adults the resources and equipment that they need, the better off they’ll be in this recovery period.”

Older victims face greater health, financial risks

Experts emphasize that older individuals may face a prolonged recovery.

In the aftermath of a disaster, there tends to be a lot of people helping, providing donations and other support, said Joan Casey, associate professor at the University of Washington’s School of Public Health.

Yet in the rebuilding period that follows, there’s often a lull, where volunteer efforts and donations dry up, she said.

Yet more than a year from now, those same disaster victims may still be displaced from their homes, she said.

“It’s that medium-term disaster period where we still want to check in on people,” Casey said.

They may be more susceptible to certain health and financial risks, particularly if they do not have a community safety net.

Nearly 80% of older adults have two or more chronic conditions, according to research from the National Council on Aging. If that includes respiratory or heart disease, the worsened air quality may be even more harmful to their health.

Older adults may also have paid off their homes, which means they may not be required to have homeowners’ insurance. Consequently, some may be completely uninsured, while others may be underinsured in an effort to keep their monthly expenses down, Arigoni said.

Scientific literature on how disasters affect older adults is “pretty mixed,” especially with regard to mental health, according to Casey. Some neurologists have found natural disasters may be a tipping point in cognitive function for older adults, she said.

Yet there’s also evidence that older individuals may be more resilient because they have developed better strategies to deal with stress over time, Casey said. They may have already experienced a disaster before, and therefore may be better prepared to handle another event.

‘I hope to live long enough to see it rebuilt’

Remains of Karen Bagnard’s Altadena, California, house after it burned in the January 2025 Los Angeles-area wildfires.

Courtesy: yesterday, my mom saw her home of over 50 years for the first time since it burned

Prior to losing her home in the wildfire, Bagnard, a professional visual artist, had recently gone through a big life adjustment as she dealt with her vision loss.

In early 2024, she held a show of her work at Pasadena Village, where she talked about coming to terms with blindness. Her favorite piece — of a sphere falling — played on darkness and light amid a color scheme of blue, teal and black, a symbol of her own journey.

“Knowing that you’re going blind is like a free fall into the darkness, and then at some point you realize that you bring the light with you, so it isn’t really dark,” Bagnard said. “You have a different kind of light; the light is inside.”

That piece was destroyed and is now among her home’s ashes, along with most of her other artwork.

For most of her life, Bagnard did pen-and-ink drawings with watercolor washes. Since the onset of her vision loss, she has transitioned to other methods, using decoupage and handmade papers as well as writing haikus.

The process of coping with her vision loss has helped her to keep the more recent loss of her home in perspective, she said, though she admits she still has moments of frustration.

To help rebuild, she has applied for a Small Business Administration loan, and her daughter started a GoFundMe account.

Other community organizations, in addition to Pasadena Village, have also stepped in to offer support.

A local nonprofit organization, Better Angels, has provided grant money to Bagnard and her grandson. And Journey House, a provider of foster care services, has promised to help Bagnard’s grandson, a former foster youth, who also lost everything in the fire.

Amid her home’s rubble, Bagnard said she has also seen signs of hope. A Danish plate with a mermaid, which Bagnard considers an art muse, survived the fire, as well as cement stairs she had painted with images of the four seasons.

She has told her two daughters and grandson it is up to them to decide what to do with the property they will eventually inherit.

“I’m going to be 80 next month, and I hope to live long enough to see it rebuilt,” Bagnard said.

Continue Reading

Personal Finance

How to save for retirement in a single-income household

Published

on

Peopleimages | Istock | Getty Images

If you’re married and in a single-income household, a lesser-known retirement strategy could boost your nest egg — and there’s still time to use it for 2024.

A spousal individual retirement account is a separate Roth or traditional IRA for the non-working spouse. With this strategy, two IRAs can be maxed out annually with enough income from the working spouse. The deadline for 2024 contributions is April 15.

“Spousal IRAs are a game changer for married couples looking to build retirement savings and manage their lifetime tax burden,” said certified financial planner Jim Davis, partner at Aspen Wealth Management in Fort Worth, Texas.

More from Personal Finance:
DOGE layoffs may ‘overwhelm’ unemployment system for federal workers
You can still lower your 2024 tax bill or boost your refund with these moves
Canada, Mexico tariffs create ‘ripple effects’ on consumer prices

For 2024, the IRA contribution limit is $7,000, plus an extra $1,000 catch-up contribution for investors age 50 and older. The caps are the same for 2025.

That means an older married couple with sufficient earned income could save up to $8,000 per IRA for 2024 before the April 15 tax deadline. They’ll have until next year’s tax due date for 2025 IRA contributions.

“For many, it’s a simple yet powerful step toward achieving long-term goals,” Davis said.

To qualify, you must file taxes jointly and your combined IRA contributions can’t exceed “taxable compensation” reported on your tax return, according to the IRS. The strategy could also work if one spouse is unemployed without enough 2024 earnings to contribute to an IRA on their own.

Roth IRAs are funded with after-tax dollars and offer future tax-free growth, but there’s an income limit. Traditional IRAs could provide an upfront tax break, depending on your income and workplace retirement plan participation.   

‘Leveling the playing field’

Another perk of spousal IRAs is the ability to create or boost retirement savings for spouses who don’t earn an income, said Michelle Petrowski, a CFP and founder of Phoenix-based financial firm Being in Abundance.

“This helps accrue retirement savings for the family CFO who may not be employed outside the home, or is currently underemployed,” she said.

In a divorce, it’s often easier to split retirement accounts when the non-earning spouse has assets in their name, noted Petrowski, who is also a certified divorce financial analyst. 

“This is a great way to acknowledge their unpaid economic contribution to the household,” she said. “It really helps with leveling the playing field in these conversations.”

Tax Tip: IRA Deadline

Continue Reading

Personal Finance

Million-dollar wage earners have stopped paying into Social Security for 2025

Published

on

A video protest sign on a truck paid for by the Patriotic Millionaires drives past a mansion owned by Amazon founder Jeff Bezos as part of a federal tax filing day protest to demand he pay his fair share of taxes, in Washington, May 17, 2021.

Jonathan Ernst | Reuters

Most workers can expect to see Social Security payroll taxes taken from their paychecks throughout the year.

But high earners with $1 million in gross annual wage income have already stopped paying into the program as of March 6, according to the Center for Economic and Policy Research.

In 2025, workers are subject to payroll taxes on up to $176,100 in earnings. Workers pay a 6.2% Social Security payroll tax rate, which is matched by their employers, for a total of 12.4%.

Once high earners hit that $176,100 cap, they no longer contribute to the program for the rest of the year.

“Elon Musk has already reached that cap of $176,100 within the first few minutes of 2025 just on gross annual wage income,” said Emma Curchin, research assistant at the Center for Economic and Policy Research.

That does not include the investment income he earns, which is not subject to Social Security payroll taxes, she said.

Approximately 6% of workers have earnings over the taxable maximum, according to the Social Security Administration.

More from Personal Finance:
Trump, DOGE job cuts may be biggest in history
Funding freeze stymies Biden-era consumer energy rebates
Trump, Musk float idea of $5,000 ‘DOGE dividend’ checks

Ultimately, higher earners who contribute to the program up to the highest taxable earnings each year for most of their careers stand to receive the maximum retirement benefit.

In 2025, the maximum Social Security benefit for a worker retiring at full retirement age is $4,018 per month.

Meanwhile, the average monthly benefit for retired workers is $1,976 per month in 2025.

Congress could mull eliminating payroll tax cap

Maximizing your Social Security benefits

One recent survey found the most popular policy option would be to eliminate the payroll tax cap for earnings of more than $400,000, according to the National Academy of Social Insurance, AARP, the National Institute on Retirement Security and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. The change would not provide additional benefits for higher earners who are affected.

The survey also found Americans would be open to higher taxes to ensure benefits either stay the same or increase.

“They’re willing to pay more, not to get extra benefits for themselves, but just to close the financing gap to prevent indiscriminate across the board benefit cuts,” Tyler Bond, research director for the National Institute on Retirement Security, previously told CNBC.com.

Another change survey respondents favored is reducing benefits for individuals with higher retirement incomes excluding Social Security. That would apply to individual retirees with $60,000 or more aside from Social Security per year and married couples with $120,000 or more per year.

“By scrapping the cap, the Social Security trust fund could be much more healthy and secure,” Curchin said.

But it’s not enough. To restore the program’s solvency, research has shown a combination of changes would be required.

Continue Reading

Personal Finance

Many investors aren’t planning for traditional IRA taxes in retirement

Published

on

Guido Mieth | Moment | Getty Images

‘Your IRA is an IOU to the IRS’

Traditional IRAs are the oldest and most common type of IRA, owned by 31.3% of U.S. households as of mid-2023, according to research from the Investment Company Institute.

Nearly two-thirds of families with traditional IRAs have accounts with retirement plan rollovers, and 43% made contributions on top of rolled over funds, ICI found.  

These accounts continue to grow, and many retirees don’t have a plan to withdraw the money, experts say.

“Your IRA is an IOU to the IRS,” said Slott, who is also a certified public accountant.

Starting at age 73, pre-tax retirement accounts are generally subject to required minimum distributions, or RMDs, based on your previous year-end balance and a life expectancy factor.

By comparison, Roth accounts, which are funded with after-tax dollars and grow tax-free, don’t have RMDs until after the accountholder’s death. But these accounts are less common. As of mid-2023, only 24.3% of households had Roth IRAs, according to ICI.

Leverage ‘bargain basement rates’

Under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act enacted by President Donald Trump, income tax brackets have been lower since 2018. That provision could be extended past 2025 under the current Republican-controlled Congress.

Slott argues it’s better to pay income taxes now at “bargain basement rates” than withdrawing from a pre-tax IRA when rates could be higher, depending on future legislative changes.

You can do that by contributing to Roth accounts or making so-called Roth conversions, which incur an upfront bill, but grow tax free. With Roth accounts, “there’s no obligation to share with Uncle Sam,” he said.

Plus, Roth accounts avoid tax issues for non-spouse heirs who inherit your IRA since most beneficiaries must follow the “10-year rule,” and empty accounts within 10 years of the original owner’s death.

Roth-only strategy could mean ‘fewer options’

While building a bucket of tax-free retirement savings is appealing to many investors, there could be some trade-offs, experts say. 

With only Roth accounts, “you’re taking away choice from individuals … because they have fewer options down the road,” certified public accountant Jeff Levine said at the Horizons conference session. 

You should aim to incur taxes at the lowest rates possible, Levine told CNBC. By paying all your taxes in advance, there’s no “dry powder” to withdraw from pre-tax accounts in future lower-income years. 

Tax Tip: 401(K) limits for 2025

Plus, you could miss future tax planning opportunities, he said.

For example, if you’re philanthropic, you can make so-called qualified charitable distributions, or QCDs, at age 70½ or older, which transfer money directly from an IRA to an eligible non-profit, Levine said.

The move lowers your adjusted gross income since you can use the withdrawal to satisfy RMDs and helps reduce your pretax balance for smaller future required withdrawals.  

Continue Reading

Trending