Connect with us

Accounting

Time for accounting firms to double down on DEI

Published

on

Change

In the face of recent backlash and a broad corporate pullback on diversity, equity and inclusion, experts say the accounting profession largely remains on track with its efforts. 

But while the profession remains strong in DEI, experts point to a loud minority amplifying an unpopular sentiment that, as a result, may see some firms quietly retreating out of fear of legal or political backlash. 

Experts agree that now is not the time to become complacent. They remind accountants that DEI is ultimately a boon to firms in terms of the bottom line and talent development — making it an invaluable lever to pull amid an ongoing talent shortage.

Breaking down DEI

The politicization of DEI has made it easy to lose sight of what the term actually means and what its implementation looks like in a firm. 

Diversity encompasses more than just race, ethnicity and gender. It also refers to age, marital status, parental status, neurodiversity, socioeconomic status, veteran status, nationality, immigration status, physical ability or disability, religion and more. 

“I don’t know how we let someone take the word ‘diversity’ and make it all things bad,” said Kimberly Ellison-Taylor, former chair of the American Institute of CPAs’ National Commission on Diversity and Inclusion. “To the extent that people don’t really understand what diversity means, that’s when you see them using it, not knowing that it includes the veterans programs, it includes the programs for young people, it includes programs for women, it includes mental health programs.”

Equity is the “assistive things that people need in order to be the best version of themselves,” Ellison-Taylor explained.

Equity is often conflated and confused with equality, but the difference is significant: Equality entails providing everyone with the same treatment across the board, while equity entails providing varying kinds of help according to each individual’s needs.

Illustration of equality versus equity concepts

“Originally, we used to talk about equality, and equality was, ‘We’re all equal. There’s a level playing field.’ Part of what DEI looks at and says is that not all people have the same opportunity as others do, and some people need a boost to enable them to have that opportunity,” said Donny Shimamoto, founder of CPA firm IntrapriseTechKnowlogies. “That’s why they show that picture of the sliding boxes. The shorter person needs a bigger box to have the equal view over the fence. If you gave everyone the same box, which is equal, the short person still can’t see over the fence.”

Lastly, inclusion is making sure everyone feels like they have a place in the profession. 

“If we’re doing it well, everyone would know where they fit, and they would not begrudge the assistance that other people are getting in order to be their full, productive selves,” Ellison-Taylor said.

Temperature check

In 2020, George Floyd was murdered by Minneapolis police, inciting a summer of racial unrest across the country. In corporate America, Floyd’s death prompted a wave of renewed commitments to DEI initiatives and programs, such as implementing diverse recruitment practices, increasing pay equity, establishing employee resource groups, and hosting trainings on topics such as unconscious bias and microaggressions. But now major companies like Ford, Microsoft, Tractor Supply, John Deere and Harley-Davidson are making headlines for reversing their DEI commitments.

It’s the result of recent political and cultural rollback: The Supreme Court decision in June 2023 effectively ending affirmative action admission programs at colleges and universities across the country, state lawmakers passing legislation restricting DEI programs on campuses and other public institutions, and powerful businessmen such as Bill Ackman and Elon Musk vocally arguing against DEI.

The general consensus among accounting leaders is that most firms are still moving forward, despite the politicization and broader corporate backlash, while a small group have pulled back. Where experts disagree is the degree to which firms are pulling back and just how many are doing so.

“The accounting profession remains strong in our stance on the importance of DEI. The future of the profession demands it,” said Anoop Mehta, past chair of the AICPA and current chair of the AICPA NCDI, noting that it is a loud minority that opposes DEI. “Now certainly is not the time for employers to overreact to whatever is going on or what you’re seeing in the media. … This is now the time to double down.”

Bonnie Buol Ruszczyk, president and manager of the Accounting MOVE Project said, “It depends on the firm that you’re looking at.”

“This is a really loud minority,” she said. “They’re the squeaky wheel, but most people do feel that this is important. They may be on different spots on the spectrum as to how important it is or what elements of it are important, but this is not a 50-50 kind of thing by any means.”

Sandra Wiley, president of Boomer Consulting, said that many firms are frightened to associate with the politics and fear the legal risks their DEI initiatives may pose. 

“Firms are almost scared to talk about it anymore because they’re afraid that what people are trying to say is that the firm will be more Republican or Democrat, which is stupid,” Wiley said. “It’s not about politics. It’s about the human aspects of what is right and what is not right.”

Firm leaders “don’t want to admit that there’s a systemic problem going on,” Wiley said, and that refusal results in top leadership being majority male and white.

Wiley said some firms are pulling back for financial reasons — they look at DEI positions in their firm and ask if they’re really boosting profitability, which means DEI leaders “have got to start looking at their metrics deeper so that they can protect their positions.” 

“The pushback on it is a little bit dumbfounding to me,” Buol Ruszczyk added. “There are those that have been in positions of power that see this as somebody trying to take their power away.”

But she clarified that implementing DEI does not mean leadership giving up their piece of the pie: “What it does is it creates a larger environment.”

“Pulling back is only going to position your firm as being run by people that don’t care about this kind of stuff,” she said. “They don’t care about their employees. They don’t care about reaching people outside of the majority of firm employees.”

The upsides of DEI

Leaders say DEI is an obvious solution to the profession’s pipeline problem. With fewer students studying accounting, fewer earning their CPA and even fewer staying in the profession until they make partner, firms need to improve both recruiting and retention. 

“When people say they can’t find talent, I’m like, ‘Where are you looking? Who are you bringing? Who are you asking?'” Ellison-Taylor said. “To some degree, it takes diverse talent to help locate diverse talent.”

Trevor Williams, audit partner and director of DEI at GRF CPAs in Bethesda, Maryland, said firm leadership is mistaken “if you don’t think your employees want to see the staff be diverse.”

“In order for DEI to be successful, there has to be a tone at the top, not just one person in leadership,” Williams added. “In order for staff to really have buy-in, they need to see that their leaders are actually bought into the various initiatives or the culture of the firm.”

“Organizations and firms do their due diligence and go through the interviewing processes, so please believe that these candidates are doing the same,” Williams said. “It’s very easy to go on your firm’s website and do a dropdown and see what leadership looks like, and if the leadership doesn’t look like that particular ethnic group, they’re not going to be that eager to join the firm.” 

The importance of diverse leadership cannot be overstated. Women, for instance, have consistently comprised just over half of all firm employees but often drop from the partner pipeline at the senior management level. This year, women comprised 35% of partners and principals, and 35% of management committees, according to the 2024 Accounting MOVE Project report

DEI is important to retaining young talent, too. For the next generation of accountants, seeing a diverse workforce when they walk through the doors is an important factor in convincing them to stay.

“Gen Z, the 20-year-olds that are popping up in the workplace today, they simply do not understand why there is even a problem,” Wiley said. “And what they really don’t understand is when they walk into the workforce, and it is completely different from what they have felt and seen and experienced in their life outside of the firm. So they go to college, or they go to school, or they go to networking events with their friends and they see a ton of diversity, and then they walk into a firm and it looks whitewashed, and they don’t get it.”

“I don’t understand why firms aren’t looking through that lens and seeing what the young people are seeing today. And so unless we change that, we are not going to retain,” Wiley continued. “They are going to leave in mass numbers, which is what’s happening right now.”

Research shows that DEI impacts the bottom line. Companies in the the top quartile for gender diversity on executive teams are 25% more likely to have above-average profitability than companies in the bottom quartile, and companies in the top quartile for ethnic and cultural diversity outperformed by 35% in profitability, according to a McKinsey report.

To break it down, retaining a diverse workforce can increase innovation and collaboration. 

“It’s really important, I believe, to have different perspectives at the table in the conversations,” said Lexy Kessler, vice chair of the AICPA and mid-Atlantic managing partner of Top 100 Firm Aprio. “If everybody has the same opinion, you’re not going to get the right answer. If you have people with different opinions and different backgrounds coming into conversation, then you get to the right answer.”

Kessler pointed to the cost of employee turnover. The cost of replacing an individual employee ranges from one-half to two times the employees’ annual salary, according to Gallup research

Client engagement is also a factor. “From a public accounting perspective, and I would think from a business and industry perspective as well, your investors, your clients, the business community, are diverse,” said Kessler. “If they see somebody that looks like you, there’s a connection.”

What’s in a name?

Some firms are dropping the name “DEI” in favor of using less politicized language such as culture, inclusion, wellbeing and belonging. They’re also emphasizing the human aspect of these efforts with terms like “people-centered” and “human-centered” leadership.

“By and large, many of the firms, I think, are standing on their values, standing on what means the most to their firm, and they’re sticking to it,” Ellison-Taylor said. “They may be calling it something different, but they are still doing the work, and I think that’s the most important part.”

“This is not a political issue,” Buol Ruszczyk said. “This is about people and about creating systems and situations where people are treated fairly.”

“You have to make it happen,” warned Mehta. “You can’t wait and hope for the best. You have to put processes in place, and you have to be intentional about it.”

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending