From the valets parking cars to the dealers at the blackjack tables to the bartenders at the city’s many bars, Las Vegas relies on people working for tips.
“Las Vegas was built on tips,” said James Reza, a city native who owns two high-end beauty salons in town.
Around 17% of workers in Nevada — the highest concentration in the country — make their living through tipped work, according to the Center for Business and Economic Research at the University of Nevada Las Vegas. Nationwide, tipped workers only account for about 2.5% of all workers, according to Yale’s Budget Lab.
To boost the incomes of these workers and win over voters in the crucial swing state where union power still holds weight, Vice President Kamala Harris and former President Donald Trump have both vowed to end taxes on tips.
Interviews with dozens of bartenders, rideshare drivers, servers, and small business owners in Las Vegas reveal the proposal, a centerpiece of national policy discussions, is certainly popular. Yet Nevadans are also clear-eyed about the candidates’ electoral intentions and befuddled by how this new system would actually work.
“I don’t know how much it would benefit them if it actually happens,” Reza said, referring to service workers.
Lawmakers of both parties, while quick to embrace the idea coming from the top of their presidential tickets, admit they haven’t nailed down exactly what taxes will be exempted from tips and who would still pay.
“For me, the devil will be in the details of all of this,” said Rep. Susie Lee, D-Nevada, whose district includes parts of Las Vegas.
Harris announced her intention to push for the tax benefit at a rally last week at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Meanwhile, after igniting the discussion with a “no tax on tips” promise in June, Trump is returning to Las Vegas Friday to reinforce his pitch to workers.
“It would be amazing” if tips became tax-exempt, said Daniel Cervantes, a bartender at CraftHaus Brewery in Las Vegas’ Arts District. “It would help me afford a better home, a place closer to work.”
Tax balancing act
President Joe Biden has signaled support for tax-free tips, as well as top congressional leaders, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., and House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-Louisiana.
The challenge, though, is writing a law that balances offering maximum benefit for workers while also ensuring that it won’t become a tool for wealthy tax dodgers.
Republicans recently introduced legislation with support from some Nevada Democrats. Rep. Steven Horsford. D-Nevada, has said he’ll introduce his own bill soon.
Tips account for nearly 10% of underreported income that makes up the tax gap, the difference between taxes paid and taxes owed, according to a 2019 Treasury watchdog report. When it was last measured in 2006, tips represented $23 billion of the $235 billion in total underreported income, Treasury found. Cracking down on noncompliance among tipped workers is a challenge for the IRS, said Ric D. Hulshoff, a Las Vegas tax attorney who previously worked at the agency.
Lawmakers say they want income and industry limitations, a new definition of what a tip is, and other potential guardrails to prevent abuse by wealthy, non-tipped workers and employers.
Both Lee and her Republican challenger for the swing district, Drew Johnson, support an income cap and restricting the benefits to certain industries. Lee said she wants to ensure that “Wall Street hedge fund managers” can’t claim their bonuses as tips.
Keeping the benefits limited to the service industry is Johnson’s “biggest concern,” he said, adding that he would support proposals that also exempt tips from federal payroll taxes.
‘God bless the IRS’
Unions and workers say they’ve had a tense history with the IRS on tip reporting since agents in the 1980s came to casinos and sat behind blackjack tables checking how much dealers were taking home in tips.
Workers said it’s not unusual to go through an entire shift without many tips, particularly when serving tourists from cultures where generous gratuities aren’t the norm. Some workers still must pay tax on the tips the IRS expected them to receive, though, due to some agreements casinos have with the agency in which workers pay taxes based on tip averages.
Tipped employees may still face audits, too. The Legal Aid Center of Southern Nevada has partnered with local unions on a program that provides legal assistance for workers under audit.
Exempting tips from taxes might be a chance for a new relationship between the IRS and Nevada’s tipped employees.
“God bless the IRS,” quipped Leain Vashon, who’s been bell captain at the Paris Hotel for nearly 25 years, and is a member of the Culinary Workers Union Local 226. “I’m not looking to get rid of taxes totally. I just want to be able to have a fair tax for me and for everyone else who’s working.”
Local 226, which represents over 60,000 service workers in Las Vegas and Reno, Nevada, and holds strong sway in the state’s politics, has been instrumental in bringing the tax-free tips to the top of the Democratic agenda. The union’s Secretary-Treasurer Ted Pappageorge initially called Trump’s idea an “empty promise,” but was quick to mobilize with the Nevada delegation to endorse a bill from Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, that would provide a 100% deduction for tipped wages, and introduce their own.
Pappageorge said the union also held conversations with Harris’ team ahead of her endorsement of the idea.
“We have relationships,” he said. “If there’s any discussion going on about gratuities and involves our members, we’re going to be in the conversation.”
Just a political move?
Despite building excitement around the tax-free tips proposals, Las Vegas workers and businesses remain skeptical.
“It’s definitely a double-edged sword,” said John Simmons, owner of the tapas restaurant Firefly off the Las Vegas Strip. “I want people to have a break, but then I also see that these politicians are using it in order to buy votes.”
Cervantes, the bartender, said it will ultimately come down to Congress to pass legislation codifying the proposal. Neither one of the candidates can act unilaterally if they take over the White House in 2025, he said.
While Pappageorge and lawmakers say they’ll make good on this promise, business owners and employees won’t count on any proposal until Congress makes serious moves.
Until there’s a law, “nobody will know who this helps and how much,” said P Moss, a Las Vegas and New York City restaurant owner.
Accounting firms are reporting bigger profits and more clients, according to a new report.
The report, released Monday by Xero, found that nearly three-quarters(73%) of firms reportedincreased profits over the past year and 56% added new clients thanks to operational efficiency and expanded service offerings.
Some 85% of firms now offer client advisory services, a big spike from 41% in 2023, indicating a strategic shift toward delivering forward-looking financial guidance that clients increasingly expect.
AI adoptionis also reshaping the profession, with80% of firms confident it will positively affect their practice. Currently, the most common use cases for AI include: delivering faster and more responsive client services (33%), enhancing accuracy by reducing bookkeeping and accounting errors (33%), and streamlining workflows through the automation of routine tasks (32%).
“The widespread adoption of AI has been a turning point for the accounting profession, giving accountants an opportunity to scale their impact and take on a more strategic advisory role,” said Ben Richmond, managing director, North America, at Xero, in a statement. “The real value lies not just in working more efficiently, but working smarter, freeing up time to elevate the human element of the profession and in turn, strengthen client relationships.”
Some of the main challenges faced by firms include economic uncertainty (38%), mastering AI (36%) and rising client expectations for strategic advice (35%).
While 85% of firms have embraced cloud platforms, a sizable number still lag behind, missing out on benefits such as easier data access from anywhere (40%) and enhanced security (36%).
Private equity firms have bought five of the top 26 accounting firms in the past three years as they mount a concerted strategy to reshape the industry.
The trend should not come as a surprise. It’s one we’ve seen play out in several industries from health care to insurance, where a combination of low-risk, recurring revenue, scalability and an aging population of owners create a target-rich environment. For small to midsized accounting firms, the trend is exacerbated by a technological revolution that’s truly transforming the way accounting work is done, and a growing talent crisis that is threatening tried-and-true business models.
How will this type of consolidation affect the accounting business, and what do firms and their clients need to be on the lookout for as the marketplace evolves?
Assessing the opportunity… and the risk
First and foremost, accounting firm owners need to be aware of just how desirable they are right now. While there has been some buzz in the industry about the growing presence of private equity firms, most of the activity to date has focused on larger, privately held firms. In fact, when we recently asked tax professionals about their exposure to private equity funding in our 2025 State of Tax Professionals Report, we found that just 5% of firms have actually inked a deal and only 11% said they are planning to look, or are currently looking, for a deal with a private equity firm. Another 8% said they are open to discussion. On the one hand, that’s almost a quarter of firms feeling open to private equity investments in some way. But the lion’s share of respondents — 87% — said they were not interested.
Recent private equity deal volume suggests that the holdouts might change their minds when they have a real offer on the table. According to S&P Global, private equity and venture capital-backed deal value in the accounting, auditing and taxation services sector reached more than $6.3 billion in 2024, the highest level since 2015, and the trend shows no signs of slowing. Firm owners would be wise to start watching this trend to see how it might affect their businesses — whether they are interested in selling or not.
Focus on tech and efficiencies of scale
The reason this trend is so important to everyone in the industry right now is that the private equity firms entering this space are not trying to become accountants. They are looking for profitable exits. And they will do that by seizing on a critical inflection point in the industry that’s making it possible to scale accounting firms more rapidly than ever before by leveraging technology to deliver a much wider range of services at a much lower cost. So, whether your firm is interested in partnering with private equity or dead set on going it alone, the hyperscaling that’s happening throughout the industry will affect you one way or another.
Private equity thrives in fragmented businesses where the ability to roll up companies with complementary skill sets and specialized services creates an outsized growth opportunity. Andrew Dodson, managing partner at Parthenon Capital, recently commented after his firm took a stake in the tax and advisory firm Cherry Bekaert, “We think that for firms to thrive, they need to make investments in people and technology, and, obviously, regulatory adherence, to really differentiate themselves in the market. And that’s going to require scale and capital to do it. That’s what gets us excited.”
Over time, this could reshape the industry’s market dynamics by creating the accounting firm equivalent of the Traveling Wilburys — supergroups capable of delivering a wide range of specialized services that smaller, more narrowly focused firms could never previously deliver. It could also put downward pressure on pricing as these larger, platform-style firms start finding economies of scale to deliver services more cost-effectively.
The technology factor
The great equalizer in all of this is technology. Consistently, when I speak to tax professionals actively working in the market today, their top priorities are increased efficiency, growth and talent. Firms recognize they need to streamline workflows and processes through more effective use of technology, and they are investing heavily in AI, automation and data analytics capabilities to do that. Private equity firms, of course, are also investing in tech as they assemble their tax and accounting dream teams, in many cases raising the bar for the industry.
The question is: Can independent firms leverage technology fast enough to keep up with their deep-pocketed competition?
Many firms believe they can, with some even going so far as to publicly declare their independence. Regardless of the path small to midsized firms take to get there, technology-enabled growth is going to play a key role in the future of the industry. Market dynamics that have been unfolding for the last decade have been accelerated with the introduction of serious investors, and everyone in the industry — large and small — is going to need to up their games to stay competitive.
The House-passed version of President Donald Trump’s massive tax and spending bill would deliver a financial blow to the poorest Americans but be a boon for higher-income households, according to a new analysis from the Congressional Budget Office.
The bottom 10% of households would lose an average of about $1,600 in resources per year, amounting to a 3.9% cut in their income, according to the analysis released Thursday. Those decreases are largely attributable to cuts in the Medicaid health insurance program and food aid through the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.
Households in the highest 10% of incomes would see an average $12,000 boost in resources, amounting to a 2.3% increase in their incomes. Those increases are mainly attributable to reductions in taxes owed, according to the report from the nonpartisan CBO.
Households in the middle of the income distribution would see an increase in resources of $500 to $1,000, or between 0.5% and 0.8% of their income.
The projections are based on the version of the tax legislation that House Republicans passed last month, which includes much of Trump’s economic agenda. The bill would extend tax cuts passed under Trump in 2017 otherwise due to expire at the end of the year and create several new tax breaks. It also imposes new changes to the Medicaid and SNAP programs in an effort to cut spending.
Overall, the legislation would add $2.4 trillion to US deficits over the next 10 years, not accounting for dynamic effects, the CBO previously forecast.
The Senate is considering changes to the legislation including efforts by some Republican senators to scale back cuts to Medicaid.
The projected loss of safety-net resources for low-income families come against the backdrop of higher tariffs, which economists have warned would also disproportionately impact lower-income families. While recent inflation data has shown limited impact from the import duties so far, low-income families tend to spend a larger portion of their income on necessities, such as food, so price increases hit them harder.
The House-passed bill requires that able-bodied individuals without dependents document at least 80 hours of “community engagement” a month, including working a job or participating in an educational program to qualify for Medicaid. It also includes increased costs for health care for enrollees, among other provisions.
More older adults also would have to prove they are working to continue to receive SNAP benefits, also known as food stamps. The legislation helps pay for tax cuts by raising the age for which able bodied adults must work to receive benefits to 64, up from 54. Under the current law, some parents with dependent children under age 18 are exempt from work requirements, but the bill lowers the age for the exemption for dependent children to 7 years old.
The legislation also shifts a portion of the cost for federal food aid onto state governments.
CBO previously estimated that the expanded work requirements on SNAP would reduce participation in the program by roughly 3.2 million people, and more could lose or face a reduction in benefits due to other changes to the program. A separate analysis from the organization found that 7.8 million people would lose health insurance because of the changes to Medicaid.