Connect with us

Accounting

Tax Fraud Blotter: No class

Published

on

Pushing 100 notices; nothing but the tooth; checking out; and other highlights of recent tax cases.

Le Roy, Minnesota: Tax preparer Craig Jacobson, 67, has been sentenced to two years of probation after pleading guilty to two felony counts of failure to collect and remit taxes, according to published reports. 

Jacobson was reportedly charged after the Minnesota Department of Revenue revealed that he failed to file multiple withholding returns, filed false withholding and federal returns, and failed to pay withholding taxes for four years.

In late 2020, the state began investigating Jacobson after learning about criminal tax violations occurring from 2015 to 2018, according to published reports. During that time, reports said, Jacobson was CEO of two companies — M&I Tax Accounting and C&C Tax Service Inc., both of which were registered with the state for corporation tax, sales and use tax, and withholding tax accounts.

From 2015 to 2016, M&I reportedly withheld taxes from employees’ wages but never turned those taxes in. The state of Minnesota sent more than 60 notices to M&I, reports added. From 2017 to 2018, C&C withheld taxes from its employees’ wages, but again, the state reportedly said no withheld taxes were paid despite tax authorities sending another 30 notices.

During the same period, Jacobson reportedly had substantial gambling winnings and losses but his returns showed no federal taxes reflecting this. A tax specialist for the state compared Jacobson’s individual returns that he filed for Minnesota with those he filed with the IRS. The two didn’t match, reports said.

News outlets added that before the plea deal Jacobson was charged with 10 felony counts of failing to file withholding tax returns, 10 felony counts of failing to pay withholding tax, four felony counts of filing false or fraudulent individual income tax returns and one felony count of filing a false withholding return.

Ft. Worth, Texas: A U.S. District Court has permanently barred tax preparer Ruben Gonzalez and anyone acting with him or at his direction from preparing federal returns for others. Gonzalez consented to the injunction.

Gonzalez is banned from using his business, “Sin Barreras Income Tax,” to prepare returns for others. The government’s complaint alleged that Gonzalez or those working for him significantly overstated clients’ refunds in a substantial number of returns prepared at the business from 2021 to 2023 by fabricating or inflating business losses, by fabricating charitable donation deductions and by falsely claiming energy credits and COVID family sick leave credits. The complaint alleges Gonzalez cost the U.S. more than $20 million in lost tax revenue from 2021 to 2023.

The injunction requires Gonzalez to notify each person for whom he or preparers at Sin Barreras prepared federal returns, amended returns or refund claims from 2021 to the present. Gonzalez must also post a copy of the injunction where he conducts business and post a statement on social media accounts and websites that he is barred from preparing returns.

Princeton Junction, New Jersey: Professor and pharmacy co-owner Gordian A. Ndubizu, 69, has been convicted of evading federal income taxes and filing false returns.

During tax years 2014 through 2017, he was a professor of accounting at a university in Pennsylvania as well as the co-owner of Healthcare Pharmacy in Trenton, New Jersey. Healthcare Pharmacy was organized as an S corporation, the income of which flowed through to Ndubizu and his wife and was to be reported on their personal income tax returns.

He prepared fraudulent books and records for Healthcare Pharmacy, inflating costs of goods sold to reduce and underreport the pharmacy’s profits flowing through to him and his wife. Among other falsehoods, Ndubizu identified certain wire transfers as payments to purchase goods sold by the pharmacy when these wire transfers were made to personal bank accounts under his control and to bank accounts in Nigeria associated with an automotive company under his control. 

Ndubizu’s returns for tax years 2014 through 2017 underreported his income and falsely reported that he had no financial interest in or signature authority over any foreign bank accounts. He failed to report some $3.28 million in income from the pharmacy, resulting in the evasion of some $1.25 million in tax.

Each count of tax evasion carries a penalty of up to five years in prison and a fine of $250,000. Each count of filing a false tax return carries a maximum of three years in prison and a fine of $250,000.

Hands-in-jail-Blotter

Hastings, Minnesota: Tax preparer Tania Fay Pryor, 37, has been sentenced to six months in jail for felony tax evasion, according to published reports.

Pryor, who reportedly once owned five H&R Block franchises and a daycare center, must also pay restitution and serve five years of probation.

Pryor was initially charged with 18 tax-related counts between 2006 and 2008 and owed more than $43,000 in unpaid taxes, reports said, adding that she pleaded guilty last May to four counts of failing to file returns or report her income and to two more charges of failing to pay taxes.

She reportedly failed to file returns or pay taxes, including for her former employees, though she deducted the money from their paychecks. According to cited state records, Pryor did not file withholding returns and tax deposits for her tax-preparing business for 2007 and 2008. A criminal complaint filed in a local county district court said Pryor owed more than $7,500 in withholding tax for 2006 for that business, according to reports.

Newark, New Jersey: Business owner Alain Rodrigues, 49, has admitted evading taxes through a check-cashing scheme.

Rodrigues owned and operated a construction company in Newark and Old Bridge, New Jersey, and beginning around 2017 deposited a portion of the payments from his customers into a business bank account; he then converted the balance to cash and money orders that he deposited in a personal bank account or used to pay cash wages to employees.

Rodrigues only reported the portion of the company’s revenue that was deposited in the business bank account on his business taxes and did not report the business revenue deposited directly into his personal bank account as income on his personal income taxes. The company, under his direction, also did not report to the IRS the cash wages it paid to employees nor collect or pay over employment taxes on these wages.

Rodrigues and his company paid $554,873 less than they owed in income taxes and failed to collect and pay over $793,139 in employment taxes, a total of some $1.35 million.

Sentencing is Dec. 19. Each count of tax evasion and failure to collect and pay over taxes carries a maximum of five years in prison and a $250,000 fine. As part of his plea agreement, Rodrigues has agreed to pay the government $1.35 million in restitution and to file amended returns. 

Pickerington, Ohio: Office manager Eric Moesle has pleaded guilty to failing to pay more than $750,000 in employment taxes and to failure to file returns. 

From 2014 through 2020, Moesle was the office manager for Elemental Dental in Pataskala, Ohio, where he oversaw payroll, bookkeeping and tax return prep. At Moesle’s direction, Elemental withheld Social Security, Medicare and income taxes from employees’ wages but did not pay over those taxes to the IRS nor file employment returns. During that time, the business also failed to pay over the employer’s share of those taxes.

Interviewed by the IRS in 2022, Moesle lied that he didn’t know that the employment taxes hadn’t been paid and that Elemental’s employment tax returns and W-2s hadn’t been filed; he also falsely stated these failures or omissions were unintentional. 

Moesle caused a federal tax loss of $760,255.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending