Connect with us

Accounting

To PE, or not to PE, is that the question?

Published

on

Many small and midsize firms are seeking a sounding board for the myriad calls they are getting from private equity firms and others seeking to acquire accounting practices. They’re exhausted. And the ongoing barrage continues to add pressure for firms to make a call on whether or not they should “go PE.” 

There are benefits to upgrading aspects of public accounting with an infusion of profit-oriented owners instituting goals, accountability and growth drivers. However, each firm would do itself, and the profession, the best service by reflecting thoughtfully about the options at hand. 

Before seeing “Should we go with private equity?” as the question, firms should step back and review their specific strategy and position. Maybe whether to go PE is still a possibility, but only after they’ve answered preliminary questions that would drive them to consider private equity. 

What does a firm need to know to determine its interest, or not, in PE (or another external capital partner)?

10 critical questions for CPAs

  1. How do you measure success (profitability/financial reward, client service, internal culture, lifestyle, professional contributions, community contributions, among others)? It’s OK to measure success differently than your peers or industry benchmarks. 
  2. How satisfied are you with your firm’s success? Rate each success area you identified above. 
  3. How confident do you feel in your ability to continue your success (1) during your career, and (2) for the ongoing legacy of your firm (after you’ve retired and been paid out)? Note: Many firms feel confident enough in continuing at a rate that meets their needs, whether they are above or below traditional or industry benchmark measures of success. This is a fine place to be, and “not to PE.”
  4. How much preference do you have for autonomy in strategy and decision making versus having additional leadership and influences in these areas? 
  5. How much preference do you have for continuing to champion industry trends and challenges, such as recruiting and technology/AI, with your current or projected internal resources? 
  6. How much preference do you have for continuing to do the ongoing work related to back-office operations like billing, collections and firm administration?
  7. Do you have the internal leadership talent and culture of accountability to reach your goals?
  8. If you could have more profitability and resources along with the involvement of outside capital and influence, would you want that arrangement? 
  9. If outside capital and influence are of interest to your firm, should you look at the pros and cons of mergers (equal or up), ESOPs, family office capital or others in addition to PE?
  10. What are the pros and cons of each option as it relates to the impact on your success measures identified above? 

Much like a choose-your-own-adventure story, the answer to each of the 10 questions above doesn’t always lead where you might expect. You may find that PE is clearly the best choice for your firm. You may find that an ESOP is very attractive, or that selling to a larger CPA firm would be the best fit for your team and clients. You may feel more confused than ever. You may find that you remain content with your partnership-model firm, just as you were before. 

Here are a few vignettes from firms I’ve talked with recently, and which options they are considering:

In one case, a $5 million firm wants to take a new step forward, something other than “what we’ve done” to propel it to future success. The partners want to continue to develop their next generation, allow current (not-quite-retirement-age) partners more opportunities, either via ongoing client service and less admin, or by moving from a client service role to an M&A role seeking out acquisitions for growth. 

It’s likely this firm’s leaders would feel satisfied with their success but have some concern about their ability to continue it, especially in the realm of recruiting and the administrative work required to operate a CPA firm. They are interested in pursuing PE to expand their options and seek a secure future for retirees, partners, staff and clients. 

In another case, an $8 million firm is content with its $600,000 average income per partner, and sufficient talent pipeline, including newer partners to replace upcoming retirements. The partners share a desire to keep buyouts at a reasonable price to allow newer partners similar current income success as earlier partners. They feel confident their in-house decision-making and governance will perpetuate the investments, profits, culture and client service they have enjoyed to date. 

It’s likely this firm’s partners would feel satisfied with their success and are content with their leadership group’s abilities and capacity to continue it. They are interested in staying independent to continue the legacy, including autonomous decision-making and profits that they’ve built to date. 

Making a decision

Along with those firms that know which option they would choose, many are in the land of uncertainty. For this I recommend continuing your quest to learn more about various options, engaging in a deeper strategic planning process and ultimately making a call, even if it’s for a limited timeframe, like six months, at which point you can revisit. 

Decision-making will allow you to move on with your goals and objectives and know clearly whether you should pick up that next inbound call offering the riches of capital or continue to champion the business you’ve already built. 

Continue Reading

Accounting

Global ESG Reporting Standards and Double Materiality Compliance

Published

on

Corporate accounting departments face expanding reporting expectations as international sustainability disclosure standards achieve regulatory enforcement across major global jurisdictions. Chief Accounting Officers (CAOs) and corporate controllers are establishing rigorous internal accounting controls to treat Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) metrics with the same data precision, auditability, and governance as traditional financial statements.

Regulatory Harmonization Under Global Sustainability Frameworks
The implementation of standardized sustainability reporting frameworks—notably rules established by international sustainability accounting boards—has created unified expectations for public and large private enterprises. Corporations must report standardized metrics covering greenhouse gas emissions (Scope 1, 2, and material Scope 3), energy utilization, workforce demographics, and supply chain governance.

In Europe and other participating international jurisdictions, double materiality principles are mandatory. Under double materiality, organizations must report both how external sustainability risks impact corporate financial performance, and how internal corporate operations affect surrounding environmental and social structures.

Integrating Sustainability Metrics into Core ERP Systems
To provide auditable non-financial data, enterprise organizations are integrating specialized carbon accounting and ESG management platforms directly into core ERP systems. Automated data collectors capture energy utility invoices, logistics fuel consumption metrics, and vendor compliance records in real time.

Establishing automated, traceable data pipelines ensures that non-financial reporting is supported by clear audit trails. This structured approach allows external financial auditors to provide reasonable assurance on sustainability disclosures during annual corporate reporting cycles.

Financial Impacts and Capital Market Disclosure
Accurate ESG reporting directly influences corporate cost of capital and institutional credit ratings. Commercial lenders and institutional asset managers systematically incorporate sustainability metrics into risk pricing models. Companies that demonstrate transparent, verifiable progress in operational energy efficiency and climate risk mitigation benefit from expanded access to green bond markets and lower debt pricing.

Action Steps for Accounting Leadership
1. Implement Double Materiality Frameworks: Conduct comprehensive assessments to identify material financial and operational sustainability metrics.
2. Build Auditable Non-Financial Data Pipelines: Automate ESG data collection within core accounting software to ensure data integrity.
3. Align Sustainability with Annual Financial Filings: Prepare non-financial disclosures concurrently with financial statements to satisfy regulatory audit expectations.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Modernizing Internal Controls: Machine Learning and Continuous Monitoring in Auditing

Published

on

Internal audit departments and corporate risk managers are modernizing internal control frameworks by shifting from periodic sampling techniques to continuous monitoring and machine learning analytics. As operational data volumes increase across enterprise organizations, automated control testing ensures financial integrity, prevents corporate fraud, and streamlines annual audit engagements.

The Limitation of Periodic Audit Sampling
Historically, internal and external auditors evaluated internal controls by reviewing random samples of financial transactions—often analyzing less than five percent of total ledger entries. In complex enterprise environments, periodic sampling methods carry inherent risks of overlooking localized financial misstatements, unauthorized disbursements, or operational control breakdowns.

In 2026, progressive internal audit functions are utilizing automated continuous monitoring platforms that evaluate one hundred percent of financial transactions in real time. Continuous control auditing systems continuously monitor general ledger entries, procurement approvals, and expense reimbursements across all operating subsidiaries.

AI-Powered Fraud Detection and Anomaly Identification
Machine learning models trained on historical corporate financial data excel at identifying subtle transactional anomalies that indicate potential fraud or operational error. Automated systems instantly flag duplicate invoice payments, unapproved vendor creation, unusual journal entry timing, and unauthorized override of authority thresholds.

When an anomaly is detected, the automated auditing platform generates an instant risk alert, allowing internal audit teams to investigate root causes immediately. Early detection prevents minor operational errors from escalating into material weaknesses in financial reporting.

Streamlining External Audit Preparation
Continuous internal control monitoring delivers significant benefits during annual external financial audits. External audit firms can review continuous audit logs and automated control testing documentation, reducing the time required for manual field testing.

This integrated approach lowers overall audit compliance fees, reduces administrative burdens on corporate accounting staff, and provides senior management and audit committees with real-time visibility into the organization’s overall risk profile.

Core Implementation Guidelines
1. Transition to 100% Data Testing: Replace legacy sampling methods with automated continuous audit monitoring systems.
2. Deploy Anomaly Detection Algorithms: Implement machine learning models to identify unauthorized transactions and operational control overrides.
3. Align Internal and External Audit Workflows: Coordinate continuous control testing protocols with external auditors to optimize annual compliance cycles.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Tax Compliance and Global Regulatory Harmonization in 2026

Published

on

Corporate tax accounting departments are navigating an era of unprecedented regulatory complexity as global tax harmonization frameworks take full effect alongside real-time digital tax reporting mandates. Tax directors and accounting teams are adopting cloud-based tax compliance automation tools to manage multi-jurisdictional tax liabilities and satisfy stringent reporting rules across international jurisdictions.

Implementation of Global Minimum Tax Provisions
The implementation of international tax reform agreements—notably the Pillar Two global minimum tax framework—has reshaped multinational corporate tax planning. Multinational enterprises with consolidated revenues exceeding established thresholds must ensure an effective tax rate of at least 15% across every jurisdiction in which they operate.

Accounting teams are implementing specialized tax calculation modules integrated directly into enterprise resource planning (ERP) platforms. These automated tools calculate effective tax rates per country, identify top-up tax liabilities, and generate standardized compliance documentation required by national tax authorities.

Real-Time Digital Invoicing and E-Reporting Mandates
Tax authorities across Europe, Latin America, and Asia-Pacific have enacted mandatory electronic invoicing (e-invoicing) and continuous transaction controls (CTC). Under these systems, corporate transaction data must be submitted electronically to government portals in real time at the point of sale or invoice issuance.

This shift toward continuous digital tax reporting eliminates traditional annual tax audits in favor of ongoing automated compliance monitoring. Accounting departments are upgrading invoicing software to ensure seamless XML data formatting, digital signature authentication, and real-time validation against tax authority databases.

Automation and Data Analytics in Corporate Tax Strategy
To keep pace with dynamic tax legislation, tax departments are transitioning from reactive compliance teams to proactive strategic advisors. Machine learning algorithms analyze corporate transactional data to identify tax credits, research and development (R&D) incentives, and cross-border transfer pricing adjustments.

By automating routine tax return filings and calculations, corporate tax directors can focus on long-term capital structuring, evaluating the tax implications of corporate mergers, and optimizing international supply chain networks.

Strategic Priorities for Tax Executives
1. ERP System Upgrades: Ensure enterprise software is capable of generating real-time, granular tax data required for global minimum tax compliance.
2. E-Invoicing Integration: Implement scalable e-invoicing platforms to satisfy regional continuous transaction control regulations.
3. Strategic Tax Analytics: Utilize predictive tax modeling tools to evaluate structural changes in corporate operations and cross-border trade.

Continue Reading

Trending